This is a wonderful, erotic thread. It's interesting to read it from beginning (flirtation and foreplay) to end (thundering whole body orgasms), with a few blow jobs and some cunnilingus, handjobs and soaked towels strewn along the way.
I'll endeavor to bring everyone down with a few not-so-erotic words. Think of me as Artemis, not Aphrodite, except I'm a guy, so Hermes, not Pan. Or something like that.
I don't know how people define "casual sex." Is that like asking for a definition of "blow job" or more like a definition of "obscenity"? Are we supposed to know it when we "see" it? I like how YGirl wrote about having casual sex with her husband. I have had sig others say to me "you know, we could just fuck, it doesn't have to be a big production." This speaks to my confusion, I guess.
So, is casual sex the physical acts of sex but without emotional connection? Without tenderness? Without intimacy and connection? Without commitment? Without without without? Can it only be negatively defined? If so, does it even really exist in pure form?
I am still figuring all of this out, but it seems sex is a wonderfully expressive, creative, surprisingly sensual and intense reality. I'm not sure what casual sex would be like. Like shaking hands? In other words, like a physical exchange but with no feeling, not even really pleasure?
I'm interested in these questions because at the moment in my experience, "casual sex" seems as mythical as the fabled Unicorn. I have always met another human being when sex has been happening involving me. (haha, what a sentence). I haven't really had casual sex, I guess. Ever. Even when I was paying for it. My partners might have, but I didn't. It's odd to realize this.
If any women from the forum are traveling through Phoenix and want to pop my casual sex cherry, send me a private message.
Immaterial