Most Skipped Step (Full Article)

GalaGirl

Well-known member

This used to be free access but now it's behind a member-only wall. For those that want to read the text only it is below. It can also be accessed without images at


Galagirl

------

The Most Skipped Step When Opening a Relationship​

by
Polyamory School

6 min read
Jun 26, 2017

You’ve had hundreds of hours of discussions on what your open relationship will look like? Check!

You’ve written down a list of limits, boundaries, rules, and expectations? Check!

You’ve created dating profiles that honestly detail what you are looking for and the honesty with your existing relationship? Check!

You’ve read at least 3 books together on the topic of nonmonogamy? Check?

You and your partner subscribe and listen to at least 3 non-monogamous-friendly podcasts? Check!

You’re all set! You open up the relationship and go off on your first dates… WHAM, arguing, suspicion, jealousy, withholding information, yelling, crying, breaking down… and a month later, you believe you don’t know each other anymore and you’re ready to call a marriage counsellor, divorce, forget you ever opened up your relationship, or all of the above.

What the hell happened?

What you didn’t realize when you were living in the cocoon of a monogamous relationship is how much of a monogamous relationship is a favorable breeding ground for codependence.

You mean you don’t follow each other into the bathroom? I didn’t say you were both at psychiatric-help levels of codependence.

But monogamy breeds codependency, and calls it romantic most of the time. Don’t believe me?

What about that story of the couple who for 50 years never missed having dinner together at the kitchen table?
Read that sentence again, and realize exactly how creepy that is.

What about the story of the couple where the husband or wife only lives a short little while after their partner dies of a seemingly broken heart (never mind the diabetes and heart failure, you’re killing the romance of the story!)
…again, that’s kinda creepy.

Or what about the couple that never fights, always shares each other’s hobbies, and becomes friends with the other person’s friends… so that they share all hobbies and friends… all the time… always together… never apart unless work forces them apart.
Creepy, creepy, and creepy.

That’s codependence, where you stop being your own individual and you start being a single individual, like Brangelina, or JayOnce, or KimYe? Those names? Creepy!

The most skipped step in the entire process isn’t even especially a step you have to take in opening up your relationship, but in making sure you remain an individual within a relationship.

What is that step?

Disentanglement.​

Disentanglement means that you bring out the individual in yourself and your partner. And many couples suck so badly at this that they often plan a codependent open relationship.

“We’ll find someone we can share!”

“We’ll look at dating sites together!”

“We’ll do all the dating at home so the other person is present!”


Why, you heard of that one couple from that one town who swears on Facebook that it worked for them!

When I read those stories, having opened quite a few relationships, my immediate reaction is to guess which person will crack first. Usually, it seems to be the one who doesn’t get the first date or has consistent problems finding partners… hmmm… imagine that.

They talk to someone new, and leave out one detail for more than 30 minutes before telling you? LIAR! You horrible cheating sneaking liar!

They go on a first date, and you don’t hear from them for more than an hour? Why, this was their plan all along! They tricked you into opening a relationship, and they’ve been talking to this person for months waiting for a way to make it happen!

They find someone to talk to almost instantly (in your mind)? They’re running away from you as fast as possible to go run away with this person!

Where did your brain go?

Who is this paranoid person in your shoes?

This article isn’t long enough to explain the exact transformation that occurred and why you are associating their new found outlet with their apparent secret agenda to throw you under the bus of pain with utter contempt for your hurt feelings.

Suffice it to say, you skipped a step, my dears.

Disentanglement will help 90% of that go away. And it’s rather simple. And you can do it all before you ever go on a single date.

Step 1​

Pick a night, any night, and leave. That’s right, it’s your night. If you picked Tuesday, go taco it up at the local La Hacienda!

They pick a night, too. They picked Thursday-- then off to karaoke it is!

You can go with friends, you can go alone. But you CANNOT go with your partner. Your partner doesn’t have to stay home, but they can’t come along.

Another rule, you can’t both pick the same night. Nice try, but you each have to get a separate night out. This helps later on so you don’t fall into “You can’t date tonight because I don’t have a date tonight, and we only go out when we can both go out!” That’s a hole of despair and control you do NOT want to go down!

And here’s a fun twist-- once you get the hang of it? Try NOT asking where the person is going or who they are going with until they get back!

That’s right, you too can build up those trust muscles using nights to assert each other's personal individuality.

Step 2​

Make the night random. Heck, throw in a weekend night here or there.

Make it so that no night of the week is safe from going out and having fun. Yes, parents, you too can do this. It means your partner is staying home with the kids. It will fight off your codependence as a parent, and allow your kids to know they’ll survive without you, too. And, they will, trust me.

At this point, your partner and you are still just going out once a week, to visit friends, watch a movie, have a meal. But… NOT DATING.

Step 3​

Get comfortable having to ask each other for date nights.

Suddenly, you’ll find that you and your partner are actually planning your own date nights again.

Listen to what I said, bored married couples. You and your partner now have to ask, “Can we go out together Saturday night, catch some dinner together, and maybe go to the…?”

Once you find yourselves asking each other for permission for that date night, because they can no longer assume they own all your time on all your days, get very comfortable with that.

It’s a simple step. You do remember how to date, right? You might even get lucky with one another! ;)

Step4​

Now, and only now, ease into dating other people.

Go very slow, and don’t immediately change all those nights out to date nights.

Try adding just 1 day per month for dating. After 4 months, you will be up to using all the days, if you wish.

Then start adding in a good night kiss on month 5. Making out on month 6, and so on…

WARNING: People suck at sticking to plans. This means that this is just a general guideline. Always and at all times on dates and with your partner tell each other and yourselves, “I am human. That means I’m sometimes impulsive, and sometimes an idiot. And knowing that, I’ll try to ease on the brakes when I realize I’m probably moving a bit too fast.”

Conclusion​

By skipping the step of disentanglement, you don’t create for yourself or your partner the clear image that you are an individual. And so, you don’t get to learn some key lessons before dating, such as:

Even if they have time alone, they still love me.

I won’t curl up into a ball and die because I’m left alone.

Having individual lives makes us both more interesting people, which strengthens our relationship.

And more…

So for the sake of Dear Abby and Dr Phil, take a few moments and add this one step into your opening-up plans, and you’ll save the world, and your neighbors, from the agony of ripping your own emotions apart at once, rather than slowly disentangling them.
 
I never realised this article takes some people's choice to have a highly entangled relationship and classes it creepy and co-dependent.

If a married couple never want to skip dinner together, that's their choice. Just because you can't have dinner with them alone, it doesn't make it creepy.

I think they could have advised ways to have time apart and some independent interests without stigmatising other people's relationship choices.
 
Ehhh, perhaps I’m reading too much into it as someone who has deliberately had to disentangle from being a person that HAD lost her identity. Seriously, friends would call us “Knight&Icesong” or “the Z’s” (where Z is short for the shared initial in our medieval reenactment name.

It’s not even just about dating - can you _really_ say that someone who _never_ goes on a trip with friends or has dinner with work colleagues is really an independent person? I personally don’t think so.
 
I never realised this article takes some people's choice to have a highly entangled relationship and classes it creepy and co-dependent.

If a married couple never want to skip dinner together, that's their choice. Just because you can't have dinner with them alone, it doesn't make it creepy.

I think they could have advised ways to have time apart and some independent interests without stigmatising other people's relationship choices.
I agree with icesong: Ehhh. It's a personal take. The disentangling part still stands. As in any and all advice, take what works and leave the rest.
 
Thanks for finding and posting this GalaGirl.
 
Glad to help.

As for the article, it's a short piece to put forth "detangling" as an idea. Something doesn't have to be "psychiatric level" for it to still be a problem.

It's not meant to be a deep research paper. As with anything, there's a spectrum:

  • unhealthy level of togetherness/enmeshment/codependence
  • like most times together, less time on their own
  • like being together lots, but some time on their own
  • even amount of time together and time on their own
  • like being in their own lots, but some time together
  • like most of the time on their own, less time together.
  • unhealthy level of independence/don't really trust/walled off

Labriola mentioned it in the book "Love in Abundance." So far, that's the only book I've read that's mentioned it as a compatibility thing to think about when creating a healthy, interdependent relationship.

Someone who likes lots of togetherness/companionship doesn't have to go all the way out to the "unhealthy" place, but they just aren't going to be compatible with someone who likes a lot time on their own and only wants to be together sometimes. It might too big a gap to bridge. She used numbers 1-10, if I remember right, like, a super-independent 2 is going to have a hard time being with a super-companionship 9, whereas a 4 and a 6 might be able to work something out, because it's not as huge a gap.

As always with books and articles, YMMV.

Galagirl
 
Last edited:
Yeah. I've always thought it a very good article. I'd never actually noticed that part of it I quoted before. I think it serves a very practical purpose to newly-poly people in a "traditional marriage with kids" set up. It gives them some idea of exactly how often "every Thursday night" will be interrupted by a family emergency before they offer that kind of weekly schedule to a partner.

When I recommend it to people, I generally stick to that logistical aspect of opening your relationship. They can find out themselves that there may be a whole emotional side to this adjustment that they aren't fully prepared for.
 
Such a good article. This is really good advice for any couple, especially for folk who got married (too) young and have been enmeshed for a decade or two. When we started talking about what our future as a couple looked like, we realized our mismatches meant we needed to find out who we were alone. Screw any consideration of CNM, we needed to figure out what life looked like off the societal autopilot we’d grown accustomed to. We relied on each other to be there “on retainer." Now she has her weekly Wednesday night meetup group and I have more freedom to set the nights I have out.

Of course, we still declared our CNM major to be swinging, but many of the same lessons are useful for reprogramming from unhealthy enmeshment and should apply to mono couples, too. That distance can create added intimacy for them, too.
 
Oof. Fair point! My wife and I are actually working on this, on Wednesdays I go out for yoga and she does whatever. It’s hard for me. We’ve been together for decades but I’ve been home relying on her to handle some things I can’t. I totally get this and we are working on it together.
 
Back
Top