LovingRadiance
Active member
Dirtclustit-I honestly don't know why you were apologizing to me. But ilwhatever offense you thought I took, I didn't. 
As for definitions-no intent to confuse. Just clarify.
And I concur with Marcus, the line of "involved" is where the confusion frequently arises. Which is why I said romantically or sexually involved.
Example: gg and maca are not romantically or sexually involved. They are tied to each other ONLY as metamours. We operate as a family unit, often seen as a whole but also everyone knows there are two couples, not three.
We are not a triad. We are a V. If anyone suggested otherwise to the guys, they woukd be irked-because they are only involved in so much as necessary for the well being of myself and the kids. But they are not in love with each other, do not feel a loving bond to one another. They are more like coworkers than friends. Definitely not close enough to make up the 3rd closed side of a triangle.
As for definitions-no intent to confuse. Just clarify.
And I concur with Marcus, the line of "involved" is where the confusion frequently arises. Which is why I said romantically or sexually involved.
Example: gg and maca are not romantically or sexually involved. They are tied to each other ONLY as metamours. We operate as a family unit, often seen as a whole but also everyone knows there are two couples, not three.
We are not a triad. We are a V. If anyone suggested otherwise to the guys, they woukd be irked-because they are only involved in so much as necessary for the well being of myself and the kids. But they are not in love with each other, do not feel a loving bond to one another. They are more like coworkers than friends. Definitely not close enough to make up the 3rd closed side of a triangle.