Desire & the End of NRE

Umm... no. Sex therapists are NOT exactly "thick on the ground," & mostly require referrals from other shrinks &/or medical doctors, & is (depending on how "hands on" it is) sometimes still prosecuted as prostitution.

A too-common misperception is that you present your health-insurance card, get sucked/fucked by a pro, & all your demons magically disappear.

Socalled "sex therapy" primarily deals with symptoms, NOT the underlying problems. The idea (originally) was that while work was ongoing (!!!) with the root problem/problems (physiological or psychological or both), a specialized therapist would help avoid the piling-up of self-doubts & frustrations, stuff that would interfere with healing would take years to unravel even after the problem itself was completely resolved.

Reverie needs a THERAPIST. Adding garbage qualifiers like "sex-" or "poly-friendly" is time-wasting bullshit.


Oh please, now you are just being obtuse for the sake of being obtuse. You are smarter than that. I've read your post history *and* your book "Roadmaps...etc." and there is no way you can possibly think that there is no such thing as a "sex therapist" or different kinds of "other-specialized therapists", nor is there any way you could actually be so dumb as to confuse "sex therapist" and "prostitute" within the context of this discussion. No one on this forum is dumb enough to believe you could really think that.
 
I remember reading a book about sexual attraction, unfortunately it's years ago and I don't know the author. She was counselling couples about who've lost spark in long-term marriages. Anyway, her main point was, that people often stop desiring each other if they come too close to each other, if the partner has become too well known. To desire someone, there must be an element of admiration, which only comes if there's something that's unknown about the other partner (having independent lives, i.e. codependency kills desire). So sometimes one partner picking up a hobby re-initiated desire in the other. She also stressed doing new (and/or exciting) stuff together, as adrenalin and the other chemicals help desire and bonding. Short, change inside the relationship sometimes ignited desire (although any particular piece of advice still seemed to be a shot into the dark).

So I have no idea if it helps or not. You guys both have very full lives, I guess you don't lack individual adventures and personal growth, but it might be worth looking if there's an area where you've grown too close and too mundane or a bit codependent and try produce a shift. (If there's such a thing, it must be your repeating pattern, likely something where you copy your family of origin as you get closer to that arrangement with your partner.)

Also, on a personal note, from the experience with my ex I conclude that my desire wanes if there's any kind of contempt (even subtle) on my side - so that's what I consider a danger for me, and work on accepting my partner's weaknesses instead of being judgemental.

Hope it's at least a bit interesting, even if not much helpful :eek:
 
Apologies for furthering any misperception, but it does seem that when many people see/hear "sex therapist," they assume surrogacy, with sexual context.

Yes, I do realize that (as I said) this is a too-common misapprension. Bummer there, as I'd think any culture even minutely "sex positive" would immediately see the upside here.
 
The way you describe how you feel after the sexual desire wanes is how many of my monogamous friends feel about a partner who isn't wrong in most ways, but isn't right in the right way. They still like them, as friends, even close/best friends, but they don't have the sexual passion/desire necessary for their romantic relationship to be mutually fulfilling because these work in tandem at least some of the time for most people. As monogamy restricts dating outside of that couple, they split up.

A monogamous friend once asked me whether I think I'd think each of my individual relationships worth continuing if I had to date exclusively. What she was asking is whether each relationship was fulfilling, or I needed all of them to feel fulfilled. If it weren't for the fact I could see other people, would I keep seeing those individuals? I pondered this for months, maybe more than a year. I decided that I couldn't have a nesting relationship where the answer to this question was "no, I wouldn't feel fulfilled enough with this relationship alone." But this isn't as important for non-nesting relationships. This led me to split from my first spouse as the relationship was more about mutual companionship and convenience than passion and desire. It would have been okay if that worked for both of us, but it didn't. It left one party feeling inadequate and impacted on their ability to form other healthy relationships as their self esteem was so low.
 
Reverie needs a THERAPIST. Adding garbage qualifiers like "sex-" or "poly-friendly" is time-wasting bullshit.

I actually have had a therapist turn me down in the past when she learned I was in a poly relationship, so I think the poly-friendly part might be kind of important.

I know there's a relative lack of mystery. But long time partners can surprise you. No one stays the same completely. As they grow and change they can seem more exciting.

Yes, I keep hoping and hoping that eventually this will happen. When I think of what is sexy, I don't think "mystery" per se, so it seems like it wouldn't be a factor, but maybe it is on some subconscious level.

Anyway, her main point was, that people often stop desiring each other if they come too close to each other, if the partner has become too well known. To desire someone, there must be an element of admiration, which only comes if there's something that's unknown about the other partner (having independent lives, i.e. codependency kills desire). ...She also stressed doing new (and/or exciting) stuff together, as adrenalin and the other chemicals help desire and bonding. ... it might be worth looking if there's an area where you've grown too close and too mundane or a bit codependent and try produce a shift.

This might be interesting to look at—the idea of having independent lives but also making sure that some of the things that we do do together are new and exciting things.

I do know that when Rider and I do fun and exciting things together, I feel closer to him, but generally that has not corresponded to a libido bump. And our "independent lives" aspect unfortunately only so far has seemed to make me feel more detached in an odd sense.

Also, on a personal note, from the experience with my ex I conclude that my desire wanes if there's any kind of contempt (even subtle) on my side - so that's what I consider a danger for me, and work on accepting my partner's weaknesses instead of being judgemental.

Oh boy, yeah, this is definitely something I struggle with sometimes. There are definitely things about Rider that I used to choose to overlook or even celebrate that lately run the risk of making me eye-rolly.

I used to not mind and indeed sometimes feel a quiet joy in helping him with certain stuff, like when his apartment was a disaster, it felt like a nice thing to do to help him clean it, or managing his calendar because he's no good with keeping it straight. But now that we've lived together for two years and it's OUR apartment, I find it frustrating that he doesn't naturally care for things to be as clean as I do.

And I used to find his peacocking and desire for attention from all quarters kind of cute, but lately for some reason I have felt irritated with attention-seeking behavior in general, whoever I witness it in, and that includes him. I've preferred to stay home rather than go to events where I know he'll get stopped every two minutes and photographed, etc. It's totally not just him, either. For example, if I'm trying to photograph someone and someone else hams or photo-bombs their way into the photo, it bugs the fuck out of me. If someone keeps turning a conversation to be all about them, I can barely hide my annoyance and I begin to think poorly of them. If someone posts a Facebook post that is clearly a bid for validation and attention, I shake my head and hide it. Basically, anytime someone is clearly trying to draw attention to themselves and try to manage other people's opinion of them, it has been bugging me lately.

Unfortunately, this is a thing that has changed about me. Rider has always been this way and actually even mentioned it from the start—that he has an "attention fetish" and is an exhibitionist and loves the spotlight. I don't know why my feelings about attention-seeking have shifted so much, but they slowly have over time. I've slowly come to feel like shallow things such as wanting to be noticed for "coolness" or appearance matter less and less to me, and that it's better to let actions and good work stand out and speak for itself than to wave a flag saying "look at meeeee"!

I think that, in part, I used to be sort of oblivious to the fact that people were even doing it, and I'm just starting to see and notice it more, and in doing so, I have negative feelings about it. Maybe I should indeed work on trying to be less judgmental. In general, whenever I do find a judgmental place inside of myself, I try to root it out and be like "live and let live." I try to observe without judgment. But sometimes that stuff sneaks up on me.

The way you describe how you feel after the sexual desire wanes is how many of my monogamous friends feel about a partner who isn't wrong in most ways, but isn't right in the right way. They still like them, as friends, even close/best friends, but they don't have the sexual passion/desire necessary for their romantic relationship to be mutually fulfilling because these work in tandem at least some of the time for most people. As monogamy restricts dating outside of that couple, they split up.

A monogamous friend once asked me whether I think I'd think each of my individual relationships worth continuing if I had to date exclusively. What she was asking is whether each relationship was fulfilling, or I needed all of them to feel fulfilled. If it weren't for the fact I could see other people, would I keep seeing those individuals? I pondered this for months, maybe more than a year. I decided that I couldn't have a nesting relationship where the answer to this question was "no, I wouldn't feel fulfilled enough with this relationship alone." But this isn't as important for non-nesting relationships. This led me to split from my first spouse as the relationship was more about mutual companionship and convenience than passion and desire. It would have been okay if that worked for both of us, but it didn't. It left one party feeling inadequate and impacted on their ability to form other healthy relationships as their self esteem was so low.

Yeaaahhhh, this is something that I kinda worry about? Like, OK, so I do have a pattern of losing desire once NRE ends. But in hindsight, in all my previous relationships, it was because the end of the NRE-blindness allowed me to see glaring flaws in the way that the people were treating me, which I'd been able to tolerate and overlook while under the influence of happy-making brain chemicals. Those relationships ended because the NRE ended, but it wasn't the wearing off of the NRE that made me want to leave—it was that if I hadn't been blinded, I would have wanted to leave long ago.

But with Rider, he treats me really well, so there's nothing like that. There's no big, glaring "oh this is a dealbreaker" thing that he's doing wrong that I have been tolerating. Sure, there are always going to be minor annoyances in any relationship, but there's nothing terrible.

But I do still sort of worry that maybe my strategy of "find someone who is a good companion and keep them" was not the best tack. What if my pattern is not "desire ends with the end of NRE" but rather the end of NRE lets me know when something isn't, as you say, "right in the right way"—or maybe it was, but something changed? And here I am, trying to stick it out because I figure that's just what happens to me, and I should power through it since the alternative is "throw something I do still value away." But how would I ever know the difference?

I feel like, hypothetically, that answer should be inside of me somewhere. But I feel like I just don't know it.

I do remember things feeling insanely perfect with Rider in the beginning, at that exact moment in time. And now they feel a bit troubled and, looking back, I can see signs of potential sexual incompatibility that I missed at the time—stuff that I was willing to try out but that didn't end up sticking well for me. Was that perfection in the beginning just NRE? Or could it be that we were truly insanely perfect for each other at the time, including the experimentation with stuff that didn't end up working for me—maybe that's something I needed to try!—and now we've just grown in different directions as I've discovered more about what I like and don't?

Currently, things feel insanely perfect with Dustin—it seems to me that there is an unprecedented natural matchup of love-style and sexual preferences and topics of interest. I know there is NRE, but is that perfection just NRE? Or does the degree of correlation and matchup suggest an ability to transcend the fade of the thrill? When the NRE wears off, will I again find that along the way I have grown and changed to a degree that the alignment isn't perfect anymore without the thrill to kind of lube it up?

Where can long-term fulfillment come from, if what I want is constantly evolving? I'd rather continue to grow and to change than to stagnate, and I feel like I'm ever-evolving in a way that calibrates me into a better person and closer to my true self each year, but does that always necessitate leaving good things behind that don't quite work the same anymore?

I feel like present me cannot speak authoritatively on what future me will feel or want—my pattern is a pattern, sure, but in this case, is it a pattern of foolishness (messing up something that could continue to work somehow just because the thrill is gone) or a pattern of wising up (recognizing that something isn't working when no longer blinded by said thrill)?

I really do feel like I should know. But I don't.
 
I too experience the lack of desire when NRE fades but, I'm at the point in my life where I am not too concerned about it. That does NOT mean you shouldn't be!

I have been right along with you from the beginning with Rider. Since I don't "know" you or your relationship, I don't know if you have diverged irreparably or not. I know your tone regarding him has changed recently.

One thing I HAVE observed is that there are some glaring red flags with Dustin, that you have mentioned; his drug and alcohol use. I know you aren't a teetotaler, but you have said yourself you do better without the alcohol, or very limited use of it. You have written about how Dustin sometimes uses it in excess and can become belligerent when he's had too much.

How does this align with Dustin's desire to have kids, or your "maybe" desire? There is no doubt in my mind that YOU would cut waaay back or even eliminate recreational substance use as a parent, but would Dustin? Is this an example of something you choose not to examine too carefully because of the NRE?

Just something to think about.
 
Where can long-term fulfillment come from, if what I want is constantly evolving? I'd rather continue to grow and to change than to stagnate, and I feel like I'm ever-evolving in a way that calibrates me into a better person and closer to my true self each year, but does that always necessitate leaving good things behind that don't quite work the same anymore?

I am divorcing my husband of 18 years because of lack of attraction and am going through the period of rapid evolution that you describe. My experience is that I don't leave "good things" behind so much as I renegotiate the contracts. He and i have been renegotiating for 3 years - evolving from mono mom & dad to very close friends who are each others' best relationship consultant. Evolving a marriage (or any LTR) doesn't necessitate leaving each other behind just because you stop having sex together. Ending a marriage does not have to mean ending a close relationship. It doesn't have to be an unpleasant grief experience. I'm not suggesting that you go the divorce route, but rather that relationships can withstand major adjustments and they need not entail the typical choices of "stay together" or "leave behind."

I've blown through a good number of lovers/dates as I've been in this rapid evolution period, but there is also a nice handful of friends (some sexual, some not) who have kept up with me and are on board for the adventure. I've gone through downscaling and upscaling people who are close to me. In both cases, people often surprise me with their capacity for adapting intimacy levels. They tend to stay in orbit with me when we both are willing to keep open hearts and minds about what we are to each other. So rapid evolution does not necessarily mean leaving a trail of dead relationships in your wake.
 
Last edited:
In general, whenever I do find a judgmental place inside of myself, I try to root it out and be like "live and let live." I try to observe without judgment. But sometimes that stuff sneaks up on me.
I find that with partners and family "live and let live" is sometimes not good enough - you can't really have such distance. So of course sometimes you have to take a firm stand and negotiate compromises - I think you're strong there. But if that's not the right thing to do, there's another antidote that I use, which is finding the flipside of the characteristic that's annoying me. Idealist is stubborn as a mule and often set in his ways which sometimes makes communication incredibly painful and compromising impossible, but looking more closely it's also what makes him grounded in his values and able to fulfil difficult goals, and this strength is one of the things I admire about him. My mom is prone to worrying and judging and takes it out on me in the form of reproaches (really horrible), but the upside closely linked to this quality is her conscientiousness, accuracy and strong worth ethic. So ... yeah. I try to appreciate. But, of course, I still wish these people would manage the downsides of their character traits better ;)
 
One thing I HAVE observed is that there are some glaring red flags with Dustin, that you have mentioned; his drug and alcohol use. I know you aren't a teetotaler, but you have said yourself you do better without the alcohol, or very limited use of it. You have written about how Dustin sometimes uses it in excess and can become belligerent when he's had too much.

How does this align with Dustin's desire to have kids, or your "maybe" desire? There is no doubt in my mind that YOU would cut waaay back or even eliminate recreational substance use as a parent, but would Dustin? Is this an example of something you choose not to examine too carefully because of the NRE?

Just something to think about.

Believe me, this is something that I think about quite a bit. Dustin says that he is looking to segue out of partying in the nearish future. We talk a lot about how we can help each other by being cut-down/quitting buddies for the booze. We seem to agree that the ideal amount of alcohol consumption, if we could manage it, is a glass of wine or two with dinner, excepting very special occasions.

He has also said to me that he's ready to quit the coke super soon. (He's not hooked on it like some people we know, thankfully.) Just yesterday he was telling me this actually. "I can't keep doing that stuff," he said.

Someone who, like me, needs to be careful with alcohol intake is probably actually a good partner for me, since we can egg each other on to make good choices.

And certainly, if I decide to have a kid, I would make sure that my partner in that would be in a good place for it—there will be lots of observing and proving that it's a good idea before any irreversible steps are taken, for sure.

I told Dustin that his jerk behavior when he's too drunk will be the thing that breaks us up if he lets it. I think I'm the first person who's ever pushed back at him on that, and he's in the "hmm, I do see that I will need to change things" stage right now. We'll see . . .
 
I'll be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if NRE is what makes some of those substance issues, acting out, and his general dives into depression over "I can't have Reverie to myself" when you're not around something that you're more willing to accept.

The fact that you justify his behavior by saying that he's said "yeah, I should cut that out EVENTUALLY" is the sort of thing that makes me wonder about that. Plenty of people who have substance issues (whether it's addiction or just they're a partier) SAY that they should quit/back off, or that they intend to. But words aren't actions. And so far it sounds like you guys talk about cutting back frequently, and yet you also very frequently post about all of the drinking and partying/substances that get used that makes it clear that in the moment, you guys don't actually make that choice to not do it.

I don't mean to say this in any sort of shamey behavior. I mean, live your life how you wanna live it, right? I'm only pointing out that in one breath you're talking about how much you dislike one partner's inability to be as clean and organized as you, or that they like to show off more and in the next breath minimizing the bad behavior of the other partner when I think many people would argue that Dustin's bad behavior would be a MUCH bigger deal because of the very nature of him having outbursts, risk of additictions, etc. But maybe you're NRE is completely blinding you to just how big of a deal you might find those behaviors. Like... if Rider was doing those things... would you feel the same way? I doubt it.

Just something to keep in mind when making those relationship decisions.

As for how all of this relates to dealing with lack of desire at the end of NRE... maybe this points more to truly knowing what behaviors and characteristics you actually do and don't want in a partner (once the NRE wears off). Or it could just mean that assuming a relationship is going to last forever isn't really the best option for you because you are the type to continue to change a lot over time. I'm not sure there's really a good answer for you, unfortunately.

It DOES seem like you've been doing a lot of processing with Rider during this period of fading NRE, so I wonder if that has anything to do with it as well. Maybe if there was less to process, that would impact things?
 
I often get discontented after NRE wanes. I tend to not lose NRE very easily (I also don't get out-of-control high on it initially). When a partner loses NRE, I find them making less effort toward the relationship and taking it more for granted, which usually triggers the end of my NRE. Sadly, unlike them, end of my NRE often ends my interest in them altogether. As it is, I have a very solo/asexual tendency. I need partners to keep making an effort to keep the relationship alive and valuing it. Not necessarily the high energy stuff of beginnings, but still valuing what we have as opposed to settling into a routine.

Many of my relationships have ended after NRE end.

Sometimes I really like my partner and make an effort to keep it alive. It is not a definitive thing, but what has worked better for me than other things i have tried:

  • Introducing change: Any change that changes how we are together. Travel, getting into some new interest, change of location, even home renovation once!
  • Acting on affection: Sometimes end of NRE is also end of any affection or "liking" for that person, in which case, game over. But other times, when I like the person, just don't want sex, I find that making conscious effort to be physical about the affection sort of trips me into wanting sex too. Hugs, massges, cuddling or even giving him a hand/blow job while not wanting sexual touch for myself.
  • Asking for partner to do something specific that I know I find sexy. May be wearing a specific shirt or some specific task (I used to get the hots watching an ex chop wood - go figure)
  • Ignoring the lack of sex and doing other fun stuff together
  • Spexy is very good with sexual ambushes. I think I don't want sex and he may do something or touch me in some way and all of a sudden I am "where is bed?" [I wonder if I simply get distracted from my sexual feelings and need a reminder]
 
- Is anyone else here like this and can commiserate? Sometimes just feeling not alone helps.

I am. Post above.

- Does anyone have a clue why this happens to people/me, and if there is anything I can do about it? (e.g., is this something that has a name and some kind of therapy is known to fix, since sexual variety has not been a cure?)

For me it happens if I think the relationship is being taken for granted. I can also suddenly switch off (but I also don't want to fix) if I lose respect for the person - usually over ethical issues.

- How do I get people to truly believe me that this has, thus far, always happened to me, and will likely happen to me with them too, eventually? Just telling them upfront has not seemed to work well.

Not sure you should tell them or even yourself. You losing interest in A, B or C doesn't mean you'll lose interest in X. Some partners are better at complementing you than others. You don't know that you will lose interest in this person, you are just apprehensive of it, given your past, but lots of people have had several relationships that lasted several years before ending. It is normal. Doesn't mean you will never want someone long term.

Unless:
  • You are certain you will lose interest in THIS person - in which case, you will also know why. You might as well dump him now or agree to a temporary fling.
  • ALL your relationships have ended in the same manner, with you having no particular reason to lose sexual interest in the partner in a similar duration, so there is nothing you can identify to change and thus expect a repeat.

I find it hard to believe only sexual interest can die without something on the emotional front as well. After all, emotions drive desire.

- Is it totally batshit to expect a marriage that STARTED already mostly companionate to survive, as long as both parties have other sexual outlets?

Not batshit, but poly isn't going to solve problems that exist between the two of you - as you are seeing. If you don't find him desirable, you need to find out why (and whether you want to fix that). Hard to get around that.

If there is a solution, great. If not, it'd be nice to just have some supportive words . . .

hug
 
- Is anyone else here like this and can commiserate? Sometimes just feeling not alone helps.
- Does anyone have a clue why this happens to people/me, and if there is anything I can do about it? (e.g., is this something that has a name and some kind of therapy is known to fix, since sexual variety has not been a cure?)

I've had two LTRs that lasted over 10 years with each one taking a different course but still having similar phases in terms of attraction. In both these relationships, we've gone through almost exactly what you've described in terms of certain aspects of the partner or relationship losing that initial sparkle. Both of my partners in these were female and both had the same loss of NRE towards me while also still feeling generally positive about me and wanting me to still be a major part of their life. While the sexual attraction faded slightly less on my end of things what did fade was my desire to spend lots of time with them, take them on adventures, etc. So whereas they'd lose the sexual spark, I'd lose the nesting spark, if that makes sense. The first relationship was mono until the very end and the second one has been non-mono the entire time.

Last time this happened (I'm still in this relationship and it's about two years since the NRE spark truly faded) I asked the same questions, namely, why does this happen? It wasn't just my relationship but other friends of mine that report the same thing happening in their LTRs, mono or not. So I started doing a lot of reading plus I've been a Savage Love listener for a long time and this issue appears in that podcast quite commonly.

I think the best book I read on it was "Anatomy of Love" by Helen Fisher. What she posits is that human NRE has evolved, possibly from before we were even modern humans, to last for about 4 years, or the amount of time it would take to rear a child to independence. So this is actually a really common thing that happens, on average 2-4 years into a relationship. However she also notes that humans appear to evolved to pair bond, hence we also have that long term oxytocin driven old relationship energy kind of love that you find yourself feeling for Rider. She also believes that in addition to being wired to pair bond, we're also wired to cheat to some degree. This is a perfunctory summary of her arguments and probably leaves out some details but it's what I took away from the book. It also really happened to fit not only what I've experienced in my life, but also the lives of my friends. Of course there may be some confirmation bias going on here, but it really resonated.

Curiously though, she does note that there are people that maintain a fairly NRE like state with regards to their partner throughout a long term relationship. What was common to people in these relationships was that the partners were able to hold on to that highly positive NRE-like vision of their partner by viewing their partner in the most positive light even when facts challenge that view. Though I admit I don't know if all of this was in the book or in some of the other stuff I read because this reading was all a couple of years ago.

For me, therapy wasn't the answer but rather renegotiating what being married meant and also discovering some things that I thought were hardline boundaries were a lot more flexible than I'd thought. For most of the past two years my spouse Lemon and I lived apart, at times living full time with other partners. At first it was a difficult adjustment but with a little practice it was a lot easier. One thing that made it more difficult though were pre-existing communication but that was also unique to our relationship. In the end we came back together not because of unquestioned assumptions about being married but because we wanted to. So even though there's been no going back to that NRE like state (some people do feel that after living apart like this) it has been really nice to be back together. Having the time and space apart really gave us a chance to figure things out.


Of course, I don't know that this is a solution for anyone but us because I'm not a scientist and this certainly wasn't a double blind study with controls. Would it be feasible for you live more full time with Dustin and have a more dating like relationship with Rider while remaining married?
 
For most of the past two years my spouse Lemon and I lived apart, at times living full time with other partners. At first it was a difficult adjustment but with a little practice it was a lot easier. One thing that made it more difficult though were pre-existing communication but that was also unique to our relationship. In the end we came back together not because of unquestioned assumptions about being married but because we wanted to. So even though there's been no going back to that NRE like state (some people do feel that after living apart like this) it has been really nice to be back together. Having the time and space apart really gave us a chance to figure things out.

Such an interesting perspective, Refusnik. Thanks for posting.

I think it's pretty well known that domesticity is a major culprit in NRE death. I still don't know why people clammer to live together and a one twue shared bedroom seems nuts to me. Esther Perel gives a fascinating Ted Talk on desire in long term relationships. She's done a lot of work around the topics of infidelity, relationships and what a fulfilling sex life can be.
 
Curiously though, she does note that there are people that maintain a fairly NRE like state with regards to their partner throughout a long term relationship.

I can relate with this totally. All through me being in a relationship, I always have a heightened sense of interest toward partner. Very close to NRE. Losing this usually means the end of the relationship. I don't know what it feels like to be complacent about a relationship and I don't like seeing it in others. If I see it in my partner, I will usually try to rekindle the relationship and if I fail, I lose interest soon after - even if there may not be anything specifically wrong other than not seeming interested in nurturing/maintaining the relationship - as I call it.
 
My experience is that I don't leave "good things" behind so much as I renegotiate the contracts...Evolving a marriage (or any LTR) doesn't necessitate leaving each other behind just because you stop having sex together. Ending a marriage does not have to mean ending a close relationship. It doesn't have to be an unpleasant grief experience. I'm not suggesting that you go the divorce route, but rather that relationships can withstand major adjustments and they need not entail the typical choices of "stay together" or "leave behind."
...
In both cases, people often surprise me with their capacity for adapting intimacy levels. They tend to stay in orbit with me when we both are willing to keep open hearts and minds about what we are to each other. So rapid evolution does not necessarily mean leaving a trail of dead relationships in your wake.

Yeah, no matter what happens, whether my desire comes back or not, I really do hope to keep Rider in my life. I want us to stay together, if it's possible. And if it's not possible for some reason at some point, I absolutely want to at least stay very good friends with him. He's so important to me that it cannot be overstated. I love him so very much.

...there's another antidote that I use, which is finding the flipside of the characteristic that's annoying me. Idealist is stubborn as a mule and often set in his ways which sometimes makes communication incredibly painful and compromising impossible, but looking more closely it's also what makes him grounded in his values and able to fulfil difficult goals, and this strength is one of the things I admire about him.

This is actually a really good idea. I'll do some thinking on what the flipsides of some of the stuff I've mentioned might be. :)

The fact that you justify his behavior by saying that he's said "yeah, I should cut that out EVENTUALLY" is the sort of thing that makes me wonder about that. Plenty of people who have substance issues (whether it's addiction or just they're a partier) SAY that they should quit/back off, or that they intend to. But words aren't actions. And so far it sounds like you guys talk about cutting back frequently, and yet you also very frequently post about all of the drinking and partying/substances that get used that makes it clear that in the moment, you guys don't actually make that choice to not do it. I don't mean to say this in any sort of shamey behavior. I mean, live your life how you wanna live it, right?

Well, yeah, at this point, it's definitely a can that we're kicking down the road. We've both been "we're gonna cut back when the time comes that it feels right" and not "we're going to cut back next Tuesday" and then breaking that.

Specifically for me, I've been feeling a turning point creeping up for the past couple of years, like it's just around the corner. I've been getting mostly bored in bars, less into drinking cheap stuff just because it's there (as opposed to saving up and shelling out for something decent), and just generally more aware of feeling negative consequences.

Dustin has said similar things to me (before I said them to him), so I think he's reaching that point too. Whether it'll actually arrive or not remains a matter for another day. I'm not putting up with bad behavior indefinitely. We're at just over four months, so I'm still just kind of observing at this point. Is it a pattern that sticks? Is he capable of managing it? Does he seem generally to stick to his word over time? We'll see.

...in one breath you're talking about how much you dislike one partner's inability to be as clean and organized as you, or that they like to show off more and in the next breath minimizing the bad behavior of the other partner when I think many people would argue that Dustin's bad behavior would be a MUCH bigger deal because of the very nature of him having outbursts, risk of addictions, etc. But maybe your NRE is completely blinding you to just how big of a deal you might find those behaviors. Like... if Rider was doing those things... would you feel the same way?

To be clear, I wasn't trying to drag Rider through the dirt, and I'm not generally very focused on these (minor in the scheme of things) annoyances—the only reason I brought up those little dislikes at all was trying to explore ways that (as Tinwen suggested) some kind of subtle contempt might be coloring my libido issues. It was more of an exercise than anything.

When it comes to "whose flaws are bigger," I try not to do too much of the one-to-one comparison stuff, since it's not like I'm trying to choose between them. The Rider issues are the Rider issues, and the Dustin issues are the Dustin issues, and (other than when they are jealous of each other) there are not a lot of effects that the one kind has on the other.

I really only brought up Dustin in this thread in the context of "will the sexual energy die there too, eventually?" I definitely do see the red flag of his petulant outbursts while drinking, and I've talked to him about it to the point of saying "if this keeps up, it will be the thing that drives me to leave." He knows he's on thin ice with that one, though I have not gone so far as to set up a strike system or anything like that. It's a pretty big deal as it stands, NRE aside, and I'm keeping an eye on the tolerable/intolerable point.

To answer the last question in that paragraph, there have, indeed, been times when I've had to talk to Rider about his drinking. There was one point back in 2015, and another point last year, where he was getting regularly obliterated when we would hang out, to the point that it annoyed me and was beginning to affect our intimacy (mostly in the way that he'd get too drunk and pass out before we had a chance to have sex). Usually he's responsive when I express grave concerns about a thing, so thankfully he mostly does not go all the way to obliterated anymore. But with each of them, really all I can do is talk to them about my concerns and set my own boundaries about how much I'll tolerate before it isn't healthy or fun for me anymore.

As for how all of this relates to dealing with lack of desire at the end of NRE... maybe this points more to truly knowing what behaviors and characteristics you actually do and don't want in a partner (once the NRE wears off).

This is one of the lessons I've been trying to take from each ending, actually, basically my entire adult life. When the NRE wears off, what are the things that I discover are intolerable? OK, I'll look for people without those things from here on out. I was actually explaining this to someone else the other day. And I've actually done pretty well avoiding the traits in my growing list of "do not wants" in subsequent relationships. My discovered deal-breakers (in rough chronological order):
- domestic violence
- being a serious pot-head
- cheating
- having a meth addiction
- pressuring me to do sex things I don't want to do
- emotional unavailability
- emotional abuse in the form of hypercriticism
- being too immature to handle any kind of adulting
- compulsive lying
- being controlling of what I wear, where I go, and who I hang with
- being too far away to afford to see each other regularly

I've actually managed not to repeat any of those mistakes again in a subsequent LTR. None of the stuff I mentioned as little annoyances with Rider seems to rise to those levels of seriousness though. I do know that even the more minor stuff can be libido-killing—I once ended a fling because the guy looked at me in a way that reminded me of my dog and it zapped my desire—but I'm not sure that's what's going on here. I'll give it some thought.

Or it could just mean that assuming a relationship is going to last forever isn't really the best option for you because you are the type to continue to change a lot over time. I'm not sure there's really a good answer for you, unfortunately.

This is the part that I live in terror of. Because I really DO want that "forever." I want to know someone in very close quarters for a long time, and to be known by them. I want to grow old with someone. I want to work toward shared goals and build something with them. I want a "happily ever after" with at least one person.

But I do change a lot over time. And I tend to partner with creatures of habit who do not change very much. I wonder if a LTR with someone who changes as much as I do would be more stable (because we'd readily adapt to each other's adventures) or less stable (because we'd each go haring off in a new and opposite direction at the drop of a hat)?

It DOES seem like you've been doing a lot of processing with Rider during this period of fading NRE, so I wonder if that has anything to do with it as well. Maybe if there was less to process, that would impact things?

Maybe. But the fade has been ongoing since some point last year. I can't remember anymore exactly when. Spring-ish, maybe? And the processing? Well, looking back it feels like we've been processing a lot forever, excepting the first couple months.

The first year was processing his ex's jealousy over me and his bad hinging. The second year was mostly processing my jealousy over Kelly. The third year was mostly me doing a shit-ton of processing about "should we even be poly" because I was always miserable. And then this fourth year has been (aside from a few months of wedding prep and happenings) mostly Rider processing my having other partners for once. But I feel like there has been soooooo much processing at every stage! Maybe one day we'll settle into some kind of a nice status quo . . .
 
(I'm slooooowwwly working my way through all the responses, carefully considering each. But I am reading them and not ignoring the more recent ones. Just chewing on them and deciding how to respond. But I'm also busy!)
 
Sadly, unlike them, end of my NRE often ends my interest in them altogether. As it is, I have a very solo/asexual tendency. I need partners to keep making an effort to keep the relationship alive and valuing it. Not necessarily the high energy stuff of beginnings, but still valuing what we have as opposed to settling into a routine.

Many of my relationships have ended after NRE end.

Sometimes I really like my partner and make an effort to keep it alive. It is not a definitive thing, but what has worked better for me than other things i have tried:

  • Introducing change: Any change that changes how we are together. Travel, getting into some new interest, change of location, even home renovation once!
  • Acting on affection: Sometimes end of NRE is also end of any affection or "liking" for that person, in which case, game over. But other times, when I like the person, just don't want sex, I find that making conscious effort to be physical about the affection sort of trips me into wanting sex too. Hugs, massges, cuddling or even giving him a hand/blow job while not wanting sexual touch for myself.
  • Asking for partner to do something specific that I know I find sexy. May be wearing a specific shirt or some specific task (I used to get the hots watching an ex chop wood - go figure)
  • Ignoring the lack of sex and doing other fun stuff together
  • Spexy is very good with sexual ambushes. I think I don't want sex and he may do something or touch me in some way and all of a sudden I am "where is bed?" [I wonder if I simply get distracted from my sexual feelings and need a reminder]

I love this list! Thank you! It is all good stuff to think about.

Not sure you should tell them or even yourself. You losing interest in A, B or C doesn't mean you'll lose interest in X. Some partners are better at complementing you than others. You don't know that you will lose interest in this person, you are just apprehensive of it, given your past, but lots of people have had several relationships that lasted several years before ending. It is normal. Doesn't mean you will never want someone long term.

This is heartening to hear. I like having hope.

Unless:
  • You are certain you will lose interest in THIS person - in which case, you will also know why. You might as well dump him now or agree to a temporary fling.
  • ALL your relationships have ended in the same manner, with you having no particular reason to lose sexual interest in the partner in a similar duration, so there is nothing you can identify to change and thus expect a repeat.

Definitely I have done the "temporary fling" thing before for reason #1. And for reason #2 . . . there was, until now, always a particular reason that popped up that I knew the relationship would end over, so I guess I "checked out" sexually, maybe, for those reasons. But it has always been about a similar duration—somewhere between 2.5–3 years, like clockwork.

I find it hard to believe only sexual interest can die without something on the emotional front as well. After all, emotions drive desire.

Well, I mean, I guess in that time span since it started waning, there has been a lot that happened on the emotional front. Maybe I'll explore that in a blog post . . .


Thanks :)

I think the best book I read on it was "Anatomy of Love" by Helen Fisher. What she posits is that human NRE has evolved, possibly from before we were even modern humans, to last for about 4 years, or the amount of time it would take to rear a child to independence. So this is actually a really common thing that happens, on average 2-4 years into a relationship. However she also notes that humans appear to evolved to pair bond, hence we also have that long term oxytocin driven old relationship energy kind of love that you find yourself feeling for Rider. She also believes that in addition to being wired to pair bond, we're also wired to cheat to some degree. This is a perfunctory summary of her arguments and probably leaves out some details but it's what I took away from the book. It also really happened to fit not only what I've experienced in my life, but also the lives of my friends. Of course there may be some confirmation bias going on here, but it really resonated.

Thanks! I will check the book out. I've been a longtime Savage listener too.

Curiously though, she does note that there are people that maintain a fairly NRE like state with regards to their partner throughout a long term relationship. What was common to people in these relationships was that the partners were able to hold on to that highly positive NRE-like vision of their partner by viewing their partner in the most positive light even when facts challenge that view. Though I admit I don't know if all of this was in the book or in some of the other stuff I read because this reading was all a couple of years ago.

So . . . choosing blindness, so to speak? Innnteresting.

For me, therapy wasn't the answer but rather renegotiating what being married meant and also discovering some things that I thought were hardline boundaries were a lot more flexible than I'd thought. For most of the past two years my spouse Lemon and I lived apart, at times living full time with other partners. At first it was a difficult adjustment but with a little practice it was a lot easier. One thing that made it more difficult though were pre-existing communication but that was also unique to our relationship. In the end we came back together not because of unquestioned assumptions about being married but because we wanted to. So even though there's been no going back to that NRE like state (some people do feel that after living apart like this) it has been really nice to be back together. Having the time and space apart really gave us a chance to figure things out.

That is also really interesting! Thank you for sharing your story. I am definitely into the idea of creative solutions like this.

Would it be feasible for you live more full time with Dustin and have a more dating like relationship with Rider while remaining married?

I . . . don't think so. I think it would do weird things to both of them. I think Rider would feel very demoted and like I was slowly removing myself from him altogether, and I think that Dustin might get even more jealous than he already is if he were my main place to be and felt like I was "stepping out" when I went to see Rider.
 
I just went back and browsed my blog till I found when I started to lose my desire. It was toward the end of last August (2016), literally two and a half years in to the week. My first mention of it was something like, "Hm, my sexual energy has been off. Not sure what's up."

So it's been over a year of this slowly tapering waning. If I go back and look just a few months before that, back in March, I'm still describing feelings of burning passion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top