I don't want to hurt you but...(A Letter to a Non-Poly Lover)

Ever

New member
This is one of the first articles I read that really helped me sort out everything in my head when I discovered the word Polyamorous. It has helped me start to accept myself the way I am instead of try and hide it or try and make it go away. This is just who I am. I hope that if there is anyone else here that is new or not so new but still struggling that maybe this could help in some fashion. I found it here and didn't write this(http://www.elephantjournal.com/2014...-but-letter-to-a-non-poly-lover-freya-watson/)


My dearest companion and lover,
I know we have tried to talk about this and I understand how uncomfortable it makes you feel. Please believe me when I say that I understand the confusion and fear it can stir up, the feelings of inadequacy and even outright rejection.
They are all feelings I have had to deal with in order to get to a place where I can even broach this subject with you—and they are still feelings that emerge from time to time, no matter how articulate and comfortable I may appear discussing it.
Do you really think I could sit, if the situation was reversed, and hear that you love another without feeling some of those emotions myself?
Like you, I have often wished I didn’t feel the way that I do—wished the whole thing would go away, or that I could bury my head in the sand.
There are times I wished I could be totally happy and fulfilled loving only you for ever and ever, amen. But that’s not who I am. And to pretend otherwise would be to condemn myself to a life half-lived, to deny my deep ability and desire to love.
I’m not sure if I’m more capable of deep love than others are, or if I’m just more willing to admit it openly. Maybe we’re all just wired differently.
Sometimes I feel as if I’m caught between a rock and a hard place, wanting to honor what we share while also needing to honor love as and when it springs up between myself and another outside of our relationship. I know you don’t really ‘get’ this, much as I hope you will—though, if I’m being honest, maybe that hope is more so that I can feel comfortable rather than for your sake.
You’ve often said that one lover is enough for you, that life is complicated enough without adding further complication. And I have to accept and honor that as being your truth, even if part of me wishes it were otherwise.
But there are things I’d like to say to you—things I’d like you to hear clearly from me— and I’m offering these in writing so that you can take them away and digest them slowly in private.
Honey, loving another doesn’t mean I don’t love you or that I love you less. Long ago I had to reconcile the inner conflict I felt when I first experienced the strange situation of loving more than one person deeply. I now know that my heart and mind are wide enough to encompass more than one at a time.
I’ve also come to believe that it is a more natural way for us all to be, although I accept you may not agree.
Loving another doesn’t mean I’m dissatisfied with what we have either. I know we have our ups and downs, same as every other couple. And I promise I will always do my best to address whatever comes up between us within the container of our relationship rather than ‘escaping’ to the arms of another simply because it’s easy.
Funnily, I actually find it more difficult to love others when things aren’t good between us—somehow it seems to stem the natural flow of love which I feel when we’re strong. I’m more available to love’s energy in general when it is flowing well between us.
Loving more than you doesn’t necessarily mean I want to be involved sexually with other people.
There are times when I might like to, times when it feels like a natural extension of what I feel—and I know that is really hard for you to hear. But there are also times when it isn’t the natural thing to do, when it feels more natural to share love simply through friendship and non-sexual closeness.
This is something I’d like to be able to talk to you about more. Every relationship has its boundaries. For some, they lie tightly around the couple. For others, they are wide and broad. I would dearly love an opportunity to talk—without drama—about where our boundaries are, about what each of us needs and can live with.
Most of all, though, loving others doesn’t mean I’m going to leave you. Our relationship, while founded on love, has many other aspects to it as well. We share a life together not only because we love each other deeply but because we get on well together on so many other levels too—and I am committed to continuing to share that with you and to protecting what we have.
This is but one difference between us and we have so much more in common. I know there are no guarantees in life, but the way I feel is not a threat to what we have. If anything, I feel that allowing love to flow with less conditions can strengthen our connection and bring us closer.
But I have to admit to being scared myself as well. I’m scared that my openness may prompt you to ‘retaliate’ by closing down on us. I’m scared that if I acknowledge to you my feelings for another that you may deliberately go out and sleep with someone just to ‘balance the books’, regardless of whether you feel any love for them.
And I’m scared that you may feel pressured into trying to love another but won’t be able to sustain both your love for me and your love for them.
See, we’re both scared, really, when it comes down to it. Maybe you’ll take comfort from knowing we have that in common.
I hope you read this and take it in the spirit with which it’s offered. If it offends or hurts, please know it wasn’t intended to.
And I hope that, when what I have said has settled, we can sit and talk with open hearts and minds about how we can grow the container of our relationship enough to accommodate the wide expanse of who we both are.
With deepest love & respect,
your lover.

(sorry if I posted this to the wrong section, forgive my newbie-ness)
 
Last edited:
This depends on the unspoken notion that if one feels an emotion, one must act on that emotion. I don't think it's all that unique to have a crush on, or fall in love with, two or more people at the same time. I see polyamory as the choice to act on those feelings, and monogamy as the choice to remain faithful to/monogamous with another person even if such feelings happen.
 
I like that letter. The language in it is kind and inclusive. A good way to go about it, I think.

For me, receiving something like that would probably signal the end of a romantic relationship with the sender. I have no desire for the complexity that trying to juggle extra romantic relationships brings into live and no desire either to deal with a partner high on NRE or down due to a breakup or other relationship not going well. Nor do I wish to feel worry for metamours and the need to work to help their relationship with my partner be strong.

I can see the benefits that others gain from multiple romantic relationships in the same way as I can see the benefits that others gain from having children. I don't want the hassle and complication of children in my life either.

Because of the complications I see in poly relationships, I see no need to act on feelings of love for others. When I have a crush on somebody - I am in the throws of at least 2 right now - I enjoy the feelings. I like the way it makes that friend feel more interesting and I love feeling more excited than usual about seeing that friend or colleague. I might talk to my partner about how much I like the person. That's it. I don't get upset about it. I don't feel the need to act on it. I just enjoy it.

The only difference for me between somebody telling me that they can only be happy with a poly relationship and somebody telling me that they can only be happy with children is that I might change my mind one day about poly relationships while I'm fast reaching an age where there will be no changing my mind about children.

IP
 
Speaking as someone who has adapted (happily) to my husbands need to be polyamorous I rather like that letter. However I think if he had presented me with a letter like that without talking to me first I would have been devastated and I probably wouldn't have waited around to talk about it. As it was I made it very hard for my husband, when he first tried to talk to me about it I closed down the conversation and refused to even think about it. Maybe if he had given me a letter like that after our conversation it would have helped, I don't know. At least I could have re read it as often as I needed to as I tried to process what he was telling me.

We both made some mistakes. It's a very big thing to tell a wife that you need to change the whole basis of your relationship because you no longer want to be monogamous. I needed to get my head around it in my own time and to work out what I wanted. I don't know if there is a right way to tell a partner something like that. I'm very happy with the way things have worked out, it's better like this but it took a lot of emotional turmoil to reach this point.
 
honestly i feel that if someone felt the need to write such a letter then they are desperately trying to sway the other person. I imagine that talks have occurred by that point. i think if you have to beg to practice polyamory because your mono partner doesnt want it then it's just time to move on. it's really awesome for those who have mono partners that are willing to give it a try, but many are not.
 
I think the reason I so liked the letter is because it summed up a lot of feelings I was having about it in a way I couldn't express on my own or find the words for. Communication is key, even within yourself and I felt like this helped me see inside myself a little bit. Also just knowing that I was not the only one feeling like that(being on the side of the writer) helped me wrap my head around some of the things that were going round and round in my head. I like the idea of the letter although I am fortunate in that my husband understands all of this and still embraces me so I have no real need for showing him such a letter.

I don't see the begging aspect of it. My perspective is she is more trying to get the reader to understand her side, how she is feeling and all of the conflict that is going on inside of her as well. My understanding is that she is trying to let the reader know that because she has the capacity for loving more than one person at a time does not mean she loves him any less, that their relationship is lacking, or that she is in any way unhappy with it but that she just happens to fall in love with others as well.

It is very interesting to see how everyone else interprets this letter :)
 
i also didnt like this line

you may deliberately go out and sleep with someone just to ‘balance the books’, regardless of whether you feel any love for them.

well maybe he doesnt want to "love" someone else, maybe if she has other partners he'd like to go out and play the field and have casual sex. it sounds like the letter writer almost wants to have her cake and eat it too.
 
Madam Sensitive Mono over here took exception to this one:
I’ve also come to believe that it is a more natural way for us all to be, although I accept you may not agree.

It's about as offensive as me telling you that I believe polyamory is unnatural, but I accept you may not agree. Just, ick.

However, I get that it's mainly someone expressing their emotions in letter (although a somewhat poetic one) form. Overall, I thought the tone was fine - "I wish you could understand me." I know I've wished that I could really understand Chops in that way. It's helped me try to find ways of getting closer to that understanding, even if I never 100% achieve it.
 
I'd love to hear from the actual letter writer what she means by she'd love to talk 'without drama' about where the boundaries lie. It seems to me that all too often, 'without drama' means, "I want to tell you what I want, even something that's going to hurt you, and not have to deal with your pain."

I wonder if the letter writer would find it acceptable for her husband to say, without drama, "My boundaries are monogamy. It's what we agreed to, and it's what I want out of a relationship. No, I'm not willing to change that." No drama, communication is clear.
 
I'd love to hear from the actual letter writer what she means by she'd love to talk 'without drama' about where the boundaries lie. It seems to me that all too often, 'without drama' means, "I want to tell you what I want, even something that's going to hurt you, and not have to deal with your pain."

I wonder if the letter writer would find it acceptable for her husband to say, without drama, "My boundaries are monogamy. It's what we agreed to, and it's what I want out of a relationship. No, I'm not willing to change that." No drama, communication is clear.

That's what I'm thinking. The letter writer only wants to hear what she wants.
 
That's the problem with trying to express complicated feelings/needs/wants in writing. What the writer wants to convey is not necessarily the meaning the recipient will take from what is written.

I think it is always going to be difficult for one member of an established couple to introduce the idea of polyamory. It is bound to cause hurt and confusion to the other partner and I think it is good that the writer has tried to think about the partners reaction and offer some reassurance. The problem is that the person wanting to open the relationship will have been thinking about and trying to make sense of their feelings and needs (or wants) for a long time but it will be completely new and disturbing for the other partner. It is unreasonable to expect to discuss it 'without drama' because its a big deal and in many cases it will mean the end of the relationship.

I'm not sure that there is a right way to do it, but speaking personally I would respect an honest attempt at communication.
 
Madam Sensitive Mono over here took exception to this one:


It's about as offensive as me telling you that I believe polyamory is unnatural, but I accept you may not agree. Just, ick.

Yup. That was my reaction, too. People are different. What is natural for you, OP, is not necessarily natural for me. What is better for you is not necessarily better for me.

Maybe your lover isn't as reactive to this kind of language as I am. But if he or she is, get rid of this sentence. You don't need it.
 
Back
Top