GirlFromTexlahoma
New member
I learn so much about myself from my reactions to other members' stories here.
One thing I've always known, but that gets reinforced daily reading here, is that I'm a very concrete thinker. Facts and specifics, please. Abstract ideas make my head hurt. My brain cannot even process an idea like, "allow love to flourish" or "address issues that threaten our relationship". What does that even mean
Give me something I can work with, like "check in before scheduling overnights".
Another thing I've realized is that I am ridiculously cautious in relationships, at least compared to the norm on this site. I make friends easily. I trust people unless they've given me a reason not to. I connect with people emotionally and have wonderful deep conversations even the first time I meet them. But I move slooooowly when it comes to depending on people and letting them become an important part of my life.
There were a couple of guys I dated for a few months each between breaking up with Tyler and meeting Dag. I can't even remember now why things didn't work out with them, but the relationships never really gained any steam. Both times, I ended things with your basic, hey, this really isn't working, but I wish you the best. And both of them continued to call and text and email wanting to "work on things" or "get closure". For months. My read was that either 1) the dudes were really desperate to get laid one last time or 2) these were some seriously unhinged people and thank fuck I dodged that bullet. But now I'm wondering, maybe some people get attached in just a few months. Maybe they actually cared about me and valued our relationship even in that short amount of time.
It's not that I think people are disposable or that it's ok to treat them like shit - I treat everyone fairly, to the best of my ability, whether I know them well or not. It's just ... It takes me a long time, like a years long time, to get to the point where I open my heart and get attached to someone.
Dag and I had been dating for about six months when I had surgery last spring. He came over and brought me food and comics to read, so sweet. About two weeks after my surgery, Andy went out if town for work, and lacking adult supervision, I decided running six weeks before I was allowed to sounded like a good plan
I ripped an incision wide open. I called my friend K, she took me to the doctor; I called Andy, he flew five hours home. I didnt tell Dag until everything was under control - and that hurt his feelings. But who calls a guy they've only been dating for six months in a crisis? A lot of people, apparently. Not me, though.
All this is my way of explaining - it's crazy confusing to me when I see people mourning short lived relationships or grieving for what might have been. I simply don't place much value on "possibility" or "maybe". Established relationships have a much higher priority for me than new ones. (It feels weird even writing that, it's like writing "the sky is blue".) Now that Dag and I have been together a while, I see that relationship as one deserving of priority and protection, same as my relationship with my husband. I just can't see accepting ANY risk to an *existing* relationship for the sake of a *possible* relationship.
It's not couple privilege as much as a tenure system
One thing I've always known, but that gets reinforced daily reading here, is that I'm a very concrete thinker. Facts and specifics, please. Abstract ideas make my head hurt. My brain cannot even process an idea like, "allow love to flourish" or "address issues that threaten our relationship". What does that even mean
Another thing I've realized is that I am ridiculously cautious in relationships, at least compared to the norm on this site. I make friends easily. I trust people unless they've given me a reason not to. I connect with people emotionally and have wonderful deep conversations even the first time I meet them. But I move slooooowly when it comes to depending on people and letting them become an important part of my life.
There were a couple of guys I dated for a few months each between breaking up with Tyler and meeting Dag. I can't even remember now why things didn't work out with them, but the relationships never really gained any steam. Both times, I ended things with your basic, hey, this really isn't working, but I wish you the best. And both of them continued to call and text and email wanting to "work on things" or "get closure". For months. My read was that either 1) the dudes were really desperate to get laid one last time or 2) these were some seriously unhinged people and thank fuck I dodged that bullet. But now I'm wondering, maybe some people get attached in just a few months. Maybe they actually cared about me and valued our relationship even in that short amount of time.
It's not that I think people are disposable or that it's ok to treat them like shit - I treat everyone fairly, to the best of my ability, whether I know them well or not. It's just ... It takes me a long time, like a years long time, to get to the point where I open my heart and get attached to someone.
Dag and I had been dating for about six months when I had surgery last spring. He came over and brought me food and comics to read, so sweet. About two weeks after my surgery, Andy went out if town for work, and lacking adult supervision, I decided running six weeks before I was allowed to sounded like a good plan
All this is my way of explaining - it's crazy confusing to me when I see people mourning short lived relationships or grieving for what might have been. I simply don't place much value on "possibility" or "maybe". Established relationships have a much higher priority for me than new ones. (It feels weird even writing that, it's like writing "the sky is blue".) Now that Dag and I have been together a while, I see that relationship as one deserving of priority and protection, same as my relationship with my husband. I just can't see accepting ANY risk to an *existing* relationship for the sake of a *possible* relationship.
It's not couple privilege as much as a tenure system