I agree with Magdlyn. If she wants it and isn't getting it, it's a problem. If he wants it and isn't capable it's a problem.
Of course she shouldn't make him feel bad about it or throw the baby out with the bathwater and work through it. Both of which she's said she's not going to do.
SC, just because you would approach a situation a certain way, especially when you're obviously in a different headspace on the issue (she wants it, you're averse to it), doesn't mean everyone should do it the same way.
And having a contract about PIV sex isn't pressure necessarily. BDSM contracts are entered into willingly and without coersion. That's what gives them value. If they've had a conversation about it and both agree to sign the contract, there are are all kinds of minutiae that get covered. And being minutiae doesn't make them valueless.
Ultimately, only Vicki can decide if, and for how long, she wants to work on the issue and if the rest of the relationship is more valuable than the PIV issue.
Of course she shouldn't make him feel bad about it or throw the baby out with the bathwater and work through it. Both of which she's said she's not going to do.
SC, just because you would approach a situation a certain way, especially when you're obviously in a different headspace on the issue (she wants it, you're averse to it), doesn't mean everyone should do it the same way.
And having a contract about PIV sex isn't pressure necessarily. BDSM contracts are entered into willingly and without coersion. That's what gives them value. If they've had a conversation about it and both agree to sign the contract, there are are all kinds of minutiae that get covered. And being minutiae doesn't make them valueless.
Ultimately, only Vicki can decide if, and for how long, she wants to work on the issue and if the rest of the relationship is more valuable than the PIV issue.