SchrodingersCat
Active member
Like most people, I believe strong foundations with compatible people maximize the chances of successful relationships.
I don't disagree that compatibility is easier than incompatibility. But my newfound revelation about learned behaviours vs true self is currently blowing my mind.
So if you have to "change who you are" to be with someone? No. But if you have to make some changes to "how you behave?" Sure, why not?
Who we are is innate and can't be changed. People try, but it doesn't work.
But you can change how you behave. Of course you have to want those changes for your own sake or they'll never stick, but often people require external motivation to make those changes. Change is hard.
One of the things I find the most rewarding about my marriage is that it pushes me to "be a better person." (I guess that's really a euphemism for "improve my behaviour.") When behaving like a jerk hurts someone you love, the motivation to change is strong.
Most of those behaviours aren't something I ever consciously chose or desired, they're just habits. I'm not attached to them and I even dislike many of them. Left to my own devices, they're not so damaging as to require actual effort to fix. But bring another person into the mix, and the damage potential goes way up.
That's the kind of "hard work" I'm always thinking of when I think "relationships are hard work." I don't mean incompatibility issues where you're constantly struggling just to get along on a basic level. I mean making positive changes to your own behaviour, triggered and encouraged by the presence of another person.