Spork
Active member
I'm trying to process some of my personal dissonance that this situation has brought up for me, in light of some of the stuff in our community.
We take consent culture very seriously and I generally like that. For the most part. There are many situations that were always considered "normal" and "acceptable" that I always heard about growing up, that I really believe are very unacceptable...such as getting a person really drunk, in order to get them in bed. The whole business of why "girly" drinks have so much more alcohol in them, and guys "buy girls drinks" and all that. Good example of what I see as coercive behavior that could stop, and that'd be great, if it did.
But I fear we can go a bit too far with the "informed, enthusiastic consent" standards if we aren't being reasonable and I think that there are times when a person's rights to structure their own relationships (once they are in them!) need to supersede generalization. And yeah, significantly, I think that the word rape is a very serious thing to throw out there, and I often prefer "consent violation" for the many grey areas that are shy of forcibly forcing sex on someone who is unwilling and has clearly communicated unwillingness. Reading cues can be a complicated business, and there are a lot of very situational factors that I would expect could be confusing. Of course once someone has clearly stated, "You do not have my consent, I am saying NO to you" in some fashion, then one doesn't get to claim ambiguity any longer.
An example here: If I, in my relationship with Zen, where we have this whole established sex life, am sleeping in bed next to him, and he should wake up with an urge to play, he can touch me and begin to arouse me. Now, I have TOLD him that he can do this. So there is that. But if any boyfriend tried this, and we had already an established thing and were sexually active together, I would expect he's got an assumption on the side of "I probably have her consent." I might still say no, like if I'm seriously exhausted and I really need the sleep and I just can't or something...and I'd expect him to respect it, if I did. But I'm not going to call his attempt, rape. Or even a "consent violation." And while I do think it's definitely, like spousal rape and partner rape is legit, it's a thing that does happen, I'm not saying it doesn't...but I think that there is a different threshold there.
When you are trying to pick up a stranger or put moves on a date, you don't have the established context or framework, I do think it's sensible to err on the side of caution and getting more explicit forms of consent and making quite sure you aren't violating anyone, for sure. But my god, I'd HOPE that in a longterm, live in, sexual relationship, that eventually people would be able to relax and the default is "probably yes" unless a clear "no" is stated.
And so when I'm contemplating, the situation, with no information, no way of knowing what did or didn't occur, and knowing what (admittedly not a ton) I do about those involved in all this...and feeling that the bar of extremity to call it "rape" in the kind of relationship structure that (to the best of my knowledge) the individuals involved had...I struggle to understand the couple I know, who really do seem like decent human beings, meeting that bar. Some sort of a misunderstanding that was in effect a consent violation that should necessitate communication and behavioral changes within a relationship...maybe, sure...but you don't call people out as having raped you, if it's along those lines. Not even if you've just had the most acrimonious break up of all time, you don't.
So that's why all this has my head full of a cloud of question marks, and I feel like, either tell me everything or let me stay out of it, because...how can I have any loyalty at all, if I flip on people and easily accept that they are rapists and abusers, when I know nothing. And, too, while my knee-jerk is to say I'd far prefer to be left entirely out of it... If a friend needed to confide, ask for support, for a listener, I would hear them. If I had doubts, I most fucking definitely wouldn't undermine their feelings or position by expressing them, and depending on what I was told, it could affect my opinions of other people. But this whole Facebook call-out thing... Yeah, I just don't dig it.
If any of my community reads this and gets angry that I'm doing anything short of standing fully behind one of our own...I'm sorry. Really. But it doesn't feel authentic of me to do so at this time.
We take consent culture very seriously and I generally like that. For the most part. There are many situations that were always considered "normal" and "acceptable" that I always heard about growing up, that I really believe are very unacceptable...such as getting a person really drunk, in order to get them in bed. The whole business of why "girly" drinks have so much more alcohol in them, and guys "buy girls drinks" and all that. Good example of what I see as coercive behavior that could stop, and that'd be great, if it did.
But I fear we can go a bit too far with the "informed, enthusiastic consent" standards if we aren't being reasonable and I think that there are times when a person's rights to structure their own relationships (once they are in them!) need to supersede generalization. And yeah, significantly, I think that the word rape is a very serious thing to throw out there, and I often prefer "consent violation" for the many grey areas that are shy of forcibly forcing sex on someone who is unwilling and has clearly communicated unwillingness. Reading cues can be a complicated business, and there are a lot of very situational factors that I would expect could be confusing. Of course once someone has clearly stated, "You do not have my consent, I am saying NO to you" in some fashion, then one doesn't get to claim ambiguity any longer.
An example here: If I, in my relationship with Zen, where we have this whole established sex life, am sleeping in bed next to him, and he should wake up with an urge to play, he can touch me and begin to arouse me. Now, I have TOLD him that he can do this. So there is that. But if any boyfriend tried this, and we had already an established thing and were sexually active together, I would expect he's got an assumption on the side of "I probably have her consent." I might still say no, like if I'm seriously exhausted and I really need the sleep and I just can't or something...and I'd expect him to respect it, if I did. But I'm not going to call his attempt, rape. Or even a "consent violation." And while I do think it's definitely, like spousal rape and partner rape is legit, it's a thing that does happen, I'm not saying it doesn't...but I think that there is a different threshold there.
When you are trying to pick up a stranger or put moves on a date, you don't have the established context or framework, I do think it's sensible to err on the side of caution and getting more explicit forms of consent and making quite sure you aren't violating anyone, for sure. But my god, I'd HOPE that in a longterm, live in, sexual relationship, that eventually people would be able to relax and the default is "probably yes" unless a clear "no" is stated.
And so when I'm contemplating, the situation, with no information, no way of knowing what did or didn't occur, and knowing what (admittedly not a ton) I do about those involved in all this...and feeling that the bar of extremity to call it "rape" in the kind of relationship structure that (to the best of my knowledge) the individuals involved had...I struggle to understand the couple I know, who really do seem like decent human beings, meeting that bar. Some sort of a misunderstanding that was in effect a consent violation that should necessitate communication and behavioral changes within a relationship...maybe, sure...but you don't call people out as having raped you, if it's along those lines. Not even if you've just had the most acrimonious break up of all time, you don't.
So that's why all this has my head full of a cloud of question marks, and I feel like, either tell me everything or let me stay out of it, because...how can I have any loyalty at all, if I flip on people and easily accept that they are rapists and abusers, when I know nothing. And, too, while my knee-jerk is to say I'd far prefer to be left entirely out of it... If a friend needed to confide, ask for support, for a listener, I would hear them. If I had doubts, I most fucking definitely wouldn't undermine their feelings or position by expressing them, and depending on what I was told, it could affect my opinions of other people. But this whole Facebook call-out thing... Yeah, I just don't dig it.
If any of my community reads this and gets angry that I'm doing anything short of standing fully behind one of our own...I'm sorry. Really. But it doesn't feel authentic of me to do so at this time.