And I am confused, how is it possible that a religion that has so many rules about what people can do together before marriage has no issues with the fact that your girlfriends (who are not married to Ares) share the same bed with him?
It would be very helpful if you told us exactly what religion this is.
Originally Posted by Ravenscroft View Post
<<<They've had some of the minor medical issues that babies get, but nothing major.>>>
My guess:
The Colorado City/Hildale area has the world's highest incidence of fumarase deficiency, an extremely rare genetic condition.
There are a few sects that are self contained communities that allow contact with the outside world. I'm no expert, but The Family International (formerly Children of God) springs to mind, or perhaps an off-shoot of LDS or the like.
I'll just say what a lot of us are thinking right now:
If this is all true, and not one of the many fictional personas that regularly come through here and similar forums, then it is very sad to see you and all these other women being so brainwashed by this awful cult.
There is something "off" about this whole situation.
I would be more concerned except that I doubt that the situation that majormerrick has described is fully true. The details of this group are too fuzzy and odd to make any sense. This supposed group is big enough to have its own community infrastructure (doctors, law enforcement, stores), and yet small enough that we have never heard of it. She has said that it is *not* FDLS, and yet it seems based on FDLS.
No, I think it is far more likely that the people in majormerrick's polycule are real (lending credibility and detail to her posts) but the religious practice is not. It is common to have a sexual fascination with such polygamist groups and I believe majormerrick chooses to write about her polycule through this lens.
I believe that in addition to being fascinated with these groups, she might be writing about it here for the shock value, and to see how far our tolerance and "live and let live" values will persist in the face of extremism.
Just my two cents, based on all the evidence that is presented. I could be wrong, of course.
I had also considered this possibility, right from the get-go, though I was/am trying to give MajorMerrick the benefit of the doubt.
The reason I'd considered the veracity of MM's situation is because, shortly prior to her turning up on this board, we had another poster who wrote in a similar style - whose user-name I cannot recall right now - who claimed to be living in a poly household with one husband and three of four other women... who are her biological sisters.
This poster was around for a short while, just before MajorMerrick began posting, and I had wondered at the validity of "her" situation because it just seemed SO extreme and as if she were trying to achieve exactly what you suggest in your last few paras, MsEmotional (i.e. writing for shock value/trying to push how far the forum's tolerance of multi-partner scenarios would go.)
Edit: Here is the poster I mentioned above, JackieJ:
http://www.polyamory.com/forum/showthread.php?p=371272
Last edited: