IndieSolo
Active member
GalaGirl, you misunderstood. She did not lie.
She told the OP she would only want to have anal sex with him under certain circumstances. She had expressed a fantasy to him, but that fantasy did not appeal to him, so they never did it, even though he'd been wanting anal sex with her for a long time.
After she and the OP eventually did have anal sex together, one of the reasons the OP was surprised was because they did not do it in her fantasy circumstance. For him, it felt special that it happened that way. It seems he thought she would only do it if she could have her fantasy come true. But perhaps it really wasn't a requirement, but just a fantasy! People often have fantasies that never come true, or that they would never really want to come true.
When she then told him she had had anal sex with someone else, she also revealed that the act was not conducted under those fantasy circumstances she had previously described as being the only way she would want to do it. That revelation, and the fact that she had done it with someone else she only knew a short while, made the OP feel suddenly not special anymore.
It seems that the opportunity just felt right for her at that moment (to do it with the other guy) and she was true to herself to just take part and enjoy anal sex, though her fantasy circumstance was not part of it, and then later was true to herself to do it with the OP. The problem seems to be OP's interpretation of it all and that he has taken it all as a personal affront to him.
She told the OP she would only want to have anal sex with him under certain circumstances. She had expressed a fantasy to him, but that fantasy did not appeal to him, so they never did it, even though he'd been wanting anal sex with her for a long time.
After she and the OP eventually did have anal sex together, one of the reasons the OP was surprised was because they did not do it in her fantasy circumstance. For him, it felt special that it happened that way. It seems he thought she would only do it if she could have her fantasy come true. But perhaps it really wasn't a requirement, but just a fantasy! People often have fantasies that never come true, or that they would never really want to come true.
When she then told him she had had anal sex with someone else, she also revealed that the act was not conducted under those fantasy circumstances she had previously described as being the only way she would want to do it. That revelation, and the fact that she had done it with someone else she only knew a short while, made the OP feel suddenly not special anymore.
It seems that the opportunity just felt right for her at that moment (to do it with the other guy) and she was true to herself to just take part and enjoy anal sex, though her fantasy circumstance was not part of it, and then later was true to herself to do it with the OP. The problem seems to be OP's interpretation of it all and that he has taken it all as a personal affront to him.