Primary vetting dates?

MLmoose

New member
Has anyone had their primary talk with someone they are interested in meeting/dating before meeting in person? For example...

You meet someone online and they want to take you out to coffee. Do you allow your primary to talk with them before to get a feel of the situation before you meet the person alone?

How would you feel as the partner? How would you feel as the person being vetted?
 
I would run screaming from any partner that had another partner who needed to vet me.
 
Has anyone had their primary talk with someone they are interested in meeting/dating before meeting in person? For example...

You meet someone online and they want to take you out to coffee. Do you allow your primary to talk with them before to get a feel of the situation before you meet the person alone?

How would you feel as the partner? How would you feel as the person being vetted?

I need more context.

1) Did I ask them to talk to my potential date?
2) If they asked, why did they ask?
3) If they asked and I said no, how did they react?

Asking if they can talk with a potential date first is WEIRD to me, but like...if I asked them to then I couldn't argue.

I'm Kitchen Table poly and that's not something I would do. I can vet my own people. If I wanted to see what my polycule thought I'd legit have a family dinner with everyone, not an interview. I'm not a job.
 
Hi ML,

Technically, anything is okay if everyone consents to it, and what works for one polycule isn't always the same as what works for another. However, in most situations, the person inviting you out would think it was just too weird (if not downright nerve-racking) to have to talk to your primary first. They have to be vetted just to have coffee with you? That's a little extreme. Maybe after you've dated them a few times, the three of you could meet up for dinner. That wouldn't be quite so weird.

Regards,
Kevin T.
 
Hi ML,

Technically, anything is okay if everyone consents to it, and what works for one polycule isn't always the same as what works for another. However, in most situations, the person inviting you out would think it was just too weird (if not downright nerve-racking) to have to talk to your primary first. They have to be vetted just to have coffee with you? That's a little extreme. Maybe after you've dated them a few times, the three of you could meet up for dinner. That wouldn't be quite so weird.

Regards,
Kevin T.

Also the tone of the question/contet are helpful for answering this. Partner simply asks "hey, would you/this date mind if I had their number and maybe talked to them?" or "I know you had some negative experiences, and/or are nervous, would it be helpful if I helped vet this person?" and then respected your answer that's sodifferent than "I want to vet this person first"
 
Has anyone had their primary talk with someone they are interested in meeting/dating before meeting in person?

No.

When we had OKCupid accounts we would share info about who we were looking at or talking to - we had links to each others' individual profiles. We would share our thoughts and concerns with each other (like I do with my BFF SLeW).

There have been times that I have agreed to meet up with someone at a "Poly Meet-Up" with one of my others attending (these were friendly meet-ups, NOT a dating situation).

We have had "family dinner" type of meet-ups for first or other early dates if that's how it worked out.

For example...

You meet someone online and they want to take you out to coffee. Do you allow your primary to talk with them before to get a feel of the situation before you meet the person alone?

No. If I was that uncertain that I needed someone else to talk to them to get a read, then I wouldn't be meeting up with them.

How would you feel as the partner?

If my partner asked my opinion base on their online profile and interactions with my partner, then I would give it. If they asked me to speak with them on the phone - I would balk (I HATE talking on the phone). If they met at a party or public event that I was at, then I wouldn't object to being introduced.

How would you feel as the person being vetted?

See above - HATE to talk on the phone. If we were at a group event, then I would be civil upon being introduced but object to being expected to interact for more than introductions unless we immediately clicked.


*************

That was a broader answer than asked for. In general - NO to partner's vetting dates, OK to ask for input. If a conversation naturally leads to that development - maybe, except I hate to talk on the phone.
 
Thank you all for your input! It felt strange to me too.

We were able to talk through it and the coffee date happened yesterday without any vetting. Lol. It went wonderfully too. Now crossing my fingers for a call back for a second date!

Oh and primary was actually excited to hear how the date went when I got back! :eek: He is just as excited as I am to hear if there is a second date. :D And he suggested that since all 3 of us share a common interest (photography) that if things continue to go well that maybe in a few months we can get together to go photograph.
 
That's awesome ML, I'm so glad to hear that you were able to work things out, that your primary was supportive, and that your coffee date went well. That's a great idea, to all three of you get together to do some photographing. Wishing you the best!
 
How would you feel as the partner? How would you feel as the person being vetted?

Not in your wildest, weirdest, wettest fantasies.
 
I'm curious what prompted you to ask your question in the OP.

Originally my husband/primary asked to be allowed to speak with anyone that I wanted to meet up with before meeting them. I had asked him to let me think it over before giving him an answer. It did not set right with me. I didn't know if I was just being selfish and if I was the one in the wrong or if he was overstepping by asking such a request. After reaching out and doing some soul searching myself, I realized that it was something that I could not be ok with and was honest with him. In the end, we agreed to keep each other updated with location, when we got there, when we left, and how things went (generally). This is how we are handling all dates now and it is going very well. This was the first date we have had to navigate with someone that we did not already mutually know.
 
If you find it helpful at all.... I think that many long term mono couples that open up often feel a sort of desire to "protect" their partners. Especially men given our culture. While many will often say that they trust their partners, etc. etc. I have heard many a "but I just want to make sure that my partner is safe because we don't know this person!"

While I think that this idea is often intended to not be malicious or controlling or anything of that sort, I believe that it stems from the fact that we automatically look at people in a complete different light when the potential for dating or sex or romance comes into play. Someone would likely never feel like they needed to vet every new stranger that their partner met on the street. If I'm out at a bar with my friends, I may meet all sorts of random people, some of those people might even be eyeing me up and wanting to talk to me because they like the way I look and want to score a date. Or some of them may just be random people who are out looking to socialize. But if you were out on your own in any other context outside of a date and ended up meeting a new person, would your partner feel like they needed to vet that person? Unlikely. So what has changed other than you know, up front, that the person you're talking to is interested in a possible sexual/romantic connection? Nothing really. But ANY stranger you meet in life might have those same interests.

Basically, I tend to try to ask myself in MANY situations, if sex/romance wasn't involved, would I still behave the same way? Because in many cases, how I treat people, who I trust, how I decide one course of action over another, often wouldn't be different. If I think someone is doing something uncool, I think that whether sex is involved or not. If I think someone did a nice thing for me, it's true whether we're dating or not. If someone cancelled on me, I have feelings about that whether we're a couple or not. Etc. So to me, same applies for meeting new people. I'm capable of making my own determination as to whether a new person I'm going to be meeting is safe, or seems interesting, or like I'd enjoy conversation with them without the help of someone else. And I'm capable of assessing whether the situation feels safe without the help of someone else. So I don't really need my partner to help me with those things. What I do need them to do, is trust that I'm a capable adult that can do those things on my own. They may have feels, or worries, or what have you. But often if they stopped and asked those same questions (would I be worried about this if sex wasn't part of the equation?), it would help people to recognize when they're possibly being either over-protective, or crossing a boundary, etc.
 
Thanks for the background info, MLmoose.




OK, I'm curious to know in which culture men do not feel protective of their women? This is an aside question to the poly aspect of the discussion. Are there any cultures on earth or in history in which the men universally do/did not hold this value? I ask because it would seem to be a human thing, not a cultural thing.


Fair point and probably not the best choice of words on my part. MOST of human culture is this way. Though I vaguely recall seeing and article where countries were surveyed regarding an extensive list of various women's rights and other issues which determined that the US is still nowhere near the top in terms of women/men's equality. But for the most part, the bulk of the world treats women like we're in need of the help of men to do anything.
 
Thanks for answering, breathemusic. I deleted my question because I thought it me be too tangential, but you give a thoughtful reply.
 
HI. I'm new here but I would say no. I trust GF to make the right choices. I might meet him if she asked, but would not do so otherwise.
 
Back
Top