Sodomy laws

Shaya

New member
I've been wondering lately about sex acts that used to be illegal, which are now legal in many countries around the globe and where this trend may go in the future. In particular, most people I know frown upon bestiality and incest but I wonder if my future kids will go, "Dad! You can't judge people like that" in much the same way I would stand up for LGBT rights even though I don't identify as one.

Historically, Sodomy laws are laws that prohibit so-called 'unatural sex'. In many countries, these laws have been repealed and replaced with more specific laws on what is prohibited. Examples of sex that were once prohibited but now legal include interracial sex, LGBT sex, maybe anal sex or oral sex, and I'm sure there have been others that many progressive countries have now legalised. Examples of sex that were once prohibited under sodomy laws but still remain illegal in many progressive countries under a different name include bestiality and incest.

Are there sex acts that our children or children's children will find normal that, as an older generation we may find hard to accept? What do you guys think?
 
I'd say the legality of BDSM is a much more likely to be contested question - I'm not sure anyone will ever be pro-bestiality (and that's a good thing).

That said, I'm not particularly comfortable with the entire idea of conflating homosexuality or even kink with things like incest/bestiality, nor with discussing them as a progression. It feels WAY too much like the sort of thing Pat Robertson and his ilk would say.
 
@Icesong: Just to be controversial, what about first or cousin Incest, or adoptive brother/sister Incest?
 
I believe every state in the US allows cousin marriage, so that is not considered incest.

The difference between sex between people of the same sex and bestiality or incest is that of consent. Two adults, who happen to be the same sex, can consent to sex with each other. An animal cannot consent. A child cannot consent. Unless we suddenly decide not to care about consent (which is possible - lots of cultures don't care about consent currently or historically), I doubt the acceptance of the latter will change.
 
The US only marginally cares about consent as it is (looking at you, Cosby jury...)

And yeah. Funny story - in my state, you can marry your first cousin but you can NOT marry your *double* first cousin. Apparently this was once common enough it had to be in law. And the clerk who issued my marriage license was SO tired of explaining this that their eyes damn near rolled out of their head when I asked...
 
The US only marginally cares about consent as it is (looking at you, Cosby jury...)

And yeah. Funny story - in my state, you can marry your first cousin but you can NOT marry your *double* first cousin. Apparently this was once common enough it had to be in law. And the clerk who issued my marriage license was SO tired of explaining this that their eyes damn near rolled out of their head when I asked...

What is a double first cousin? Their parents are both your relatives by blood? Like if my sister had married my husband's brother, their kids would have been my kids' double first cousins?
 
Last edited:
Male dogs, dolphins and other animals will not just consent to sex with humans, they will initiate it.
 
So maybe it comes down to defining what consent is ...
 
Mags, your comment on male dolphins and dogs not only consenting but actually initiating sex made me chuckle :), but then made me think about what consent really means. A 14 year old girl hitting on her 40 year old teacher does not constitute consent in the court of law. I think as a society, we are using age here as a predictor or marker of self awareness or intelligence. I'd argue that a 14 year old has more of this than a dog or dolphin and therefore the dog or dolphin that initiates sexual advances on a human would still not be considered consent because they are unaware of what they are doing and can perhaps be easily manipulated. I dunno. We need an ethicist.

I still feel (without any formal training in ethics) that Opalescent hit the nail on the head when talking about consent being the key. Animals don't consent. Well, not when doing it with a human who could manipulate consent from them (perhaps, maybe, I dunno). Under age sex is similar in that manipulation is sometimes (though perhaps not always) present and therefore true consent is absent. There's also the concept of an inability to see the big picture (in animals) or to consider future regret (in young teens) which clouds the issue of their consent.

Having sad that the main argument against bestiality today may be the issue of consent, here's a somewhat humorous article of masturbating an echidna, for science of course. All perfectly legal maybe. Hope they got ethics approval. Turns out the echidna has 4 penis heads. FOUR PENIS HEADS!!! Holy Fuck! Turns out, the male echidna can do 2 orgasms before a refractory period with his 4 heads, so maybe he'll do FMF poly better than humans do. ;)

Joking joking. Please don't flame me.

Seriously! FOUR PENIS HEADS.

But back to consent. I don't know how ethics approval works but suppose scientists today are allowed to masturbate am echidna, for science (4 penis heads), and a lay person does the same thing humanely, could a court of law (in the future of course), potentially say that from the animal's perspective there is no difference - no pain and so no harm? The animal consents to sex with other animals, sometimes of different species even, but when a human is involved suddenly consent is withdrawn unless it's done for science? Just a thought just a thought. Not actually promoting bestiality here guys, it makes me as uncomfortable as I presume it makes you but hey, that's my inquisitive nature and you're all smart and i wanted to know what you thought.

Does that mean he can get four blowjobs at once?

Finally, scientists kill rats all the time, for science of course, but I can't imagine anyone getting off in a court of law for breeding and then killing rats without a good reason. You can breed and then kill chickens, fish or other 'food animal's though, and you can certainly kill rats that enter your home. Ethics really isn't my strong suit as you can tell. What do you guys think? About the topic, not my ability in ethics.

Now, where's the line for reincarnation? Four p...
 
Last edited:
What is a double first cousin? Their parents are both your relatives by blood? Like if my sister had married my husband's brother, their kids would have been my kids' double first cousins?

Exactly - two sisters marry two brothers, each couple has a kid, the kids are double first cousins to each other and can't marry. I don't know likely this is BUT...
 
Clearly you're not a farmer, Shayna - animals are masturbated frequently on farms for purposes of artificial insemination. (look up the prices on pedigreed bull semen, if you're curious and want to be shocked...)

We now return to ethics and philosophy...
 
Re (from Shaya):
"A 14-year-old girl hitting on her 40-year-old teacher does not constitute consent in the court of law."

"Don't stand so ... don't stand so ... don't stand so close to me"
 
I don't get it Kevin.

@Icesong: It was surprisingly hard to find data on bull semen. Found some kind of record bull selling semen at about £300 000 per year. I suddenly feel inadequate.


@Kevin. Sorry Kevin. I don't get it.
 
Last edited:
I don't get it Kevin.

@Icesong: It was surprisingly hard to find data on bull semen. Found some kind of record bull selling semen at about £300 000 per year. I suddenly feel inadequate.


@Kevin. Sorry Kevin. I don't get it.

It's song lyrics from the Police. The video is about a schoolgirl crushing on her teacher, an affair, and being found out. I can't recall all the lyrics to know if that whole idea is portrayed in the song itself, but the main gist is creating distance (in public) due to inappropriate relations.
 
From a google search:
The Police said:
Don't Stand So Close to Me

Young teacher, the subject
Of schoolgirl fantasy
She wants him so badly
Knows what she wants to be

Inside her there's longing
This girl's an open page
Book marking, she's so close now
This girl is half his age

Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me

Her friends are so jealous
You know how bad girls get
Sometimes it's not so easy
To be the teacher's pet

Temptation, frustration
So bad it makes him cry
Wet bus stop, she's waiting
His car is warm and dry

Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me

Loose talk in the classroom
To hurt they try and try
Strong words in the staffroom
The accusations fly

It's no use, he sees her
He starts to shake and cough
Just like the old man in
That book by Nabakov

Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me

Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me
Don't stand, don't stand so
Don't stand so close to me

Songwriters: Gordon Sumner
Don't Stand So Close to Me lyrics © Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
 
It was surprisingly hard to find data on bull semen.


I found it was quite easy, just google artificial insemination animals. There is written information, youtube videos, and photos about how to collect sperm from cattle, buffalo, pigs, dogs, etc. People even artificially inseminate honey bees apparently!

Is it "bestiality," aka zoophilia, when a human regularly collects sperm from a male bull, buffalo, dog, pig, to use it for breeding purposes? Or conversely, deposits said sperm into a fertile female's vagina? Not for science, but for commerce. Do we assume people who make their living collecting sperm or overseeing animal mating never get sexual gratification from it? I don't know, but I am sure it takes a special kind of person to spend their days collecting animal sperm for artificial insemination. I've never given it much thought... perhaps it becomes as routine as any other aspect of animal husbandry.

There are plenty of jokes about men having sex with goats when they spend long lonely days goat herding, especially in countries where female humans are strongly prohibited from premarital sex. Just as prisoners of the same sex who wouldn't be usually attracted will have sex with each other when no members of the opposite sex are available, so I assume will humans utilise members of other species in cases of extremity.

So, I guess laws on bestiality concern motivation. If you do it for science, or for commerce, it's OK. If you do it for sexual gratification or affection, it's right out, considered the worst of perversions, along with child sexual abuse and incest. Ha, you can pimp out your stud bull for cash, that's OK. But do it with affection for a pet dog, say, that's wrong and sick. Money exchange makes it OK!:eek: Disturbing. Where is the concern for the animals' consent then? The fact we can make money off them seems to throw that issue right out the window.

Well, to respond to your original question, no, I don't think incest and affectionate bestiality laws will be changing, in the Western (progressive) world. I don't necessarily think those things will suddenly be seen as normal, healthy or permissible any time soon. Human minors in the Western world are somewhat protected. There is the idea of consent. (Of course, much incest goes on behind closed doors and harms many children.) However, in other parts of the world, the marriage of young, even prepubescent girls, and the right of their slightly or much older husband to have sex with them, is quite common and has been for thousands of years. There are organisations working to stop this practice. I guess they are making some progress.
 
Last edited:
Speaking on animal consent, or lack thereof...

I have a friend who owns and breeds race horses. One of his prized female horses is frigid...won't let a stud near her for anything so they sedate her and let the stud have his way with her. It seems raping of animals is perfectly acceptable for breeding purposes.
 
It seems animal ethics is still in evolution. As a society, we don't seem to be either consistent or correct in how we apply ethics to animals or ethics to our interactions with them. I am uncertain what the future will hold but I suspect there will be progress and more clarity.

With regards to incest, not all incest involves underage children. Let's put underage incest in a different category called pedophilia and leave it there since I don't see that changing anytime soon. But incest between consensual adults of similar age, i can imagine those laws changing in the future, though the social taboo may linger, in much the same way as the other sodomy laws regarding homosexuality have changed but social taboo may linger for a few generations.

Can you think of any other sex acts that our children or children's children may be okay with in future and defend even if they don't see themselves doing sex that way, the same way heterosexuals may not see themselves participating in homosexual activities but would defend the right of others to do so today?
 
It seems animal ethics is still in evolution. As a society, we don't seem to be either consistent or correct in how we apply ethics to animals or ethics to our interactions with them. I am uncertain what the future will hold but I suspect there will be progress and more clarity.

The protections brought about by PETA and other animal advocacy groups seem to be mostly around humane living conditions, feeding, protecting habitats and killing of protected species, and how to most kindly kill the animals we use for food.

I am not aware of protections from forced sex for breeding purposes which provide income for humans, but throw the animals' "right to consent" to sexual activity right out the window. But this isn't my field. Perhaps it is being worked on...

Shaya, you seem unaware or ignorant of issues around animal husbandry. I was too... When something is new to me and piques my interest, I look it up. I found that breeding stock bulls are put in a restraining pen which is drawn closely to their sides. It is called a crusher. Then another bull or steer is put in front of the bull whose semen is to be collected. In a last resort, an actual cow in heat will be put in front of him. Oddly the bull will mount any other animal of his kind. He usually has no problem getting aroused by another male! And yet we wonder at how humans can be gay lol!!

I saw a video of a pig whose semen was being collected. He was given a "dummy" pig to get aroused by. A pigskin, headless, stuffed and stretched on a form. The male pig was biting its neck area. A voice-over said this was "foreplay." The man who was massaging the pig's penis looked up at the camera with an embarrassed grin.

And how do humans who are in this line of work deal with the sex going on in front of them? I asked Pixi. She grew up in a rural area and saw both cattle and horses being bred on a farm a few times. She said the farm workers who were involved made all sorts of sexy jokes during the mating or semen collection. They would, after all, be getting in between the mating cattle or horses with a kind of "flesh light" device, tricking the male into having his penis in there instead of in the other animal, which worked to massage the penis until the sperm came out. That's... not normal human behavior. Of course you'd need to make jokes to get around the discomfort (or your own arousal).

There was a time my ex h and I got involved in breeding cats for a period. When we'd put our stud male with our queen to mate, he and I would make jokes about the cats' passionate repeated intercourse. "Wow," he'd say, "It would be hard to keep up with them." You are supposed to let them mate 3 times and then part them. But the first time we did it we let them mate until they were exhausted. It took 12 acts of intercourse over about an hour. That was impressive. We knew it was hard on their health to go at it for so long, but we just wanted to see how far they'd go!

Oh yeah, I just remembered something I once read about, what if you have a female cat who goes into heat, but it's not time to breed her yet, and she's suffering and yowling and can't eat or sleep? Put some lube on a q-tip and insert it into her vagina! In other words, fuck her with a dildo.

One youtube video about collecting semen from an elephant was interesting. It was being done for science, to study the sperm's DNA for learning about the immune system to keep elephants healthier. The young scientists (men and women) tranquilised a bull elephant out in the bush of the sanctuary. While he was lying there unconscious, a woman and man human massaged his penis and collected the semen. When the credits ran, the scientists all had nicknames: Susan "Doctor Penis" Smith. Tom "Sperminator" Jones. Things like that.

Jokes really help when we observe or are involved in animal mating.

With regards to incest, not all incest involves underage children. Let's put underage incest in a different category called pedophilia and leave it there since I don't see that changing anytime soon. But incest between consensual adults of similar age, i can imagine those laws changing in the future, though the social taboo may linger, in much the same way as the other sodomy laws regarding homosexuality have changed but social taboo may linger for a few generations.

Perhaps. But being brought up with someone is usually fraught with enough emotions non-conducive to sexual attraction. Competition, farting and other smells, fighting, just the day to day familiarity killing romance. I don't think it's going to suddenly become hugely popular.

I worry more about humans who don't know they are siblings, due to both being a product of a prolific sperm donor bio dad. This happens! Some young guy who decides to donate sperm to a sperm bank very regularly, and then his sperm is used successfully to bring forth babies, who grow to be adults in the same area, meet and partner up, and mate, never knowing they are half siblings!
Can you think of any other sex acts that our children or children's children may be okay with in future and defend even if they don't see themselves doing sex that way, the same way heterosexuals may not see themselves participating in homosexual activities but would defend the right of others to do so today?


Well, define "sex." In recent times, up til the late 60's or even 70's, oral sex was seen as a sin and taboo. To this day some people think it's bad. Masturbation was seen as just as sinful and bad. Premarital sex was bad. Living with your lover was bad. Christianity is loosing its hold on our psyches, and therefore procreative sex in a Christian marriage, penis in vagina, no oral, no anal, no masturbation, no porn, no homosexuality, is becoming a thing of the past. Hallelujah I say. Transgender people are still murdered or commit suicide every day. Perhaps our children's children will see the sadness of that.

As for other sex acts, well, there is only so many ways to put our genitalia to use... you get into the realm of kink. Nowadays with porn available on the phone in our hip pocket, very young kids are exposed to all manner of kink. Whips and chains are so acceptable, mainstream movies make it their focus (50 Shades), if badly. I am sure BDSM will become more and more mainstream. Anal sex is acceptable now as well. Young women are expected to shave their pussies to make them even more exposed for intercourse and oral sex and photos to share on their smart phones.

Child porn, animal porn, dismemberment, snuff videos, and necrophilia are still taboo. We get around it legally though, in porn, with young women who are 18 but look younger and dress like children, with furries dressing up as animals for sex, with piercings and the like for blood enthusiasts, with simulated death and sex with people acting dead... or dressing up as the undead, vampires and other undead. Vampire movies used to be scary, now they are sexy. And sex with a werewolf comes close to bestiality, come to think of it.

Public nudity is coming along. There are cities in the US where the laws against women being topless in public are thrown out. Of course, in European parks and on beaches, there are plenty of nude people. Not so much in the US. And women are still being harassed for breastfeeding in public, which isn't even sexual. Thrown out of restaurants and off planes. Of all taboos, to me, this is the one to get rid of. Public breastfeeding is lawful in all 50 states, and yet women are regularly harassed for feeding their children with their breasts, as all mammals do.
 
Last edited:
I'm typically a very understanding person in most aspects, but I will never ever understand the contradictions in sexual related laws. There are just too many and it makes my head hurt. Haha

This conversation is amazing, though! Thank you for posting it and continuing it!
 
Back
Top