Please Help! Boundary Issue

The issues you have with sex are your issues and if you weren't so controlling, the sex your husband had within a polyamorous relationship wouldn't affect how you feel about him.

london, you are lucky enough to have a secure attachment style and to be capable of letting other people do their thing without it affecting you.

That doesn't make you "better" than insecure people. It makes you different. Just different. Feeling insecurity and needing agreements in place to cope with those emotions is not a sign of defect. Just because you yourself could never participate in those relationships does not make them "wrong."

Just like I could never participate in a D/s relationship where I have to ask someone's permission to go to the bathroom, doesn't make that "wrong."

What matters is consent. If bofish's husband consents to refrain from attending sex parties, then whether or not her motivation is disgust or insecurity or something she saw on CNN is irrelevant. It's their life to live the way they want to. They don't have to live by your standards.

I happen to agree that bofish's hang-up with sex parties is based on ignorance and fear and probably not realistic. I believe that she could benefit from therapy to overcome her sex-negative attitudes. I believe that attending a sex party and seeing that it's not as bad as she thinks would help assuage her fears. But those are her choices to make, not yours.

You sit there telling her that she has no control over the girlfriend. And yet your repetition of telling her over and over and over what to do... you behave as though you have control over bofish. She asked for advice, you gave it. Now you can stop.

She doesn't "need" do anything she doesn't want to. She has autonomy just like her husband's girlfriend, and hers is no less valid just because she's posting on the internet requesting advice and support. You have the right to tell her what you would do, you have the right to offer your opinion on what she herself should do, but you don't need to repeatedly insist that she follow your instructions. That makes you just as controlling.
 
It affects me emotionally. I have (a perhaps unfair) IDEA of what they are like from my experience with my friend's gay meth scene. Him going to these parties worries me that he is not the person I thoguh he was...we are not a right match...and I don't want that kind of lifestyle.

Your discussions about sex parties, particularly the drug parts and losing a friend to HIV, are pretty much identical to another user who was here with pretty much the same question a while back.

http://www.polyamory.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30617

That wouldn't to be you, would it? I fear that you didn't like the answers you got then so you came back hoping for different answers this time. I'm afraid you won't find them. We're usually fairly consistent on the point of controlling the behaviour of metamours.

I guess the bottom line fear is that he is more like GF than me and he will leave me for her because their sexual needs are different. My idea of a "hot" time is an intense conversation over a beer holding hands. Neither of them are interested in (or that capable of) intense conversation. To my mind, they get intamacy and connection through fucking and that is something I just don't understand.

You don't have to understand it. But you could try to accept it. He agreed not to go to them, and later decided he didn't like them either. You could take that as evidence that if he wanted wild sex more than the intimacy he finds with you, he would have left already.
 
I am confused because on another post I saw many people who won'y allow their primary to date someone until the meet them. THAT stirkes me as much more controlling. COME on! Cut me some slack. How many people on here agree that their partner can date whoever they want and ask for no boundaries. My boundaries seem A LOT less extreme. We are not required to "OK" someone. I didn't even meet husband's GF untl they had been dating 4-5 month. Husband rarely meets any of my dates and only met two long-term boyfriends once or twice.

I don't force my partner's dates to meet me, but when I begin making friends with someone new, I barely even flirt with them, and I certainly do not act in ways that anybody's SO might consider inappropriate.

It is more a matter of respect, and anything else I would not consider myself to be their friend. It is also because I do understand how easy it would be to use slightly terms when discussing me with their SO and how subtle differences make for huge differences in meaning, even if only what is implied or activities only implicated.

I have much better luck with people who don't identify as being poly, in fact, in real life, I avoid polyamory social groups because I do not get along with real life communities.
 
If you are a regular part of the BDSM or go to sex parties or fuck many parters...how do you translate to your kids? Will you tell them at a certain age? Would you feel comfortable with them doing the same and say it's ok whatever they decide?

bofish, I don't think you're going to find the answers you're looking for here. It seems like you're looking for confirmation that sex is bad and should be hidden away from children. I think you'll find that most people on this forum view sex as positive and natural. I'm not saying you should involve your kids in your sex life or something like that. But I absolutely believe kids should be given as much information about sex as they're capable of comprehending. The sooner the better.

You can't protect your kids from knowledge. They've got the internet and they're going to find out about kink, bdsm, sex parties, homosexuality, drugs, and all kinds of things you want them to stay away from. In my opinion, it's better that they hear about it from their parents. It's better that parents are aware of their children's interests and that the kids feel comfortable talking about it with their parents.

You do realize that adults don't hold the monopoly on sex parties, right? Teenagers have sex parties too.

I tried out my first pair of handcuffs when I was 16.

Parents can't teach what they don't know, so obviously not all parents can teach their kids about every possible situation. But if you do happen to have knowledge that you can share with a sexually mature young person, then I think doing that is a great idea.

Gralson taught his daughter about sex because her mother was a prude. He bought her her first vibrator when she was 13 or 14. When she was older (around 16), he told her a bit about bdsm and play parties, enough to open the door and let her ask any questions she might have. He didn't go to sex parties so he didn't teach her about those. It didn't traumatize her, but guess what? She didn't lose her virginity until she was 17 and she told her father the day after it happened. She chose the time and the place. Before that, she dumped quite a few boyfriends for pressuring her before she was ready. I attribute her waiting largely to his normalization of sex, making it not such a big taboo that she had to run out and do it just out of rebellion or to hold on to a boyfriend or for any other reasons some girls use because they don't have healthy attitudes about sex.
 
I would not care how my husband slept with a girlfriend (as long as he had safer sex), but at a sex party I would not know who and how many he slept or played with.

Just for the record, a sex party does not necessarily mean a free-for-all, everyone having sex with everyone. A couple can go to a sex party together and just have sex with each other. The parties are about voyeurism and exhibitionism, not just wild orgies.

If you can't trust your husband to uphold an agreement to go to a sex party and not to have sex with strangers or large groups of people, then how can you trust him not to sneak away to sex parties behind your back and not even tell you he's going? I know you were speaking hypothetically and that your husband probably isn't interested in sex parties anyway, but supposing you were in a situation where you had to pressure him into agreeing not to go...
 
I don't believe that having an insecure attachment style means it is fine to act unreasonably in relationships. I didn't have a secure attachment style and now I do. Making that transition wasnt easy and it required a lot of doing when I didn't necessarily feel but as I learnt more about myself and more about people generally, I began to do and feel. If you wait to feel, it'll never happen. Shits too ingrained
 
I wouldn't say you need counseling

Just because you don't consider BDSM parties and or sex parties as activities associated with intimacy, does not mean you an unhealthy or even less healthy outlook of sex.

Not wanting to stay in a relationship with someone who does is not controlling, it is taking responsibility for your own happiness and knowing what the type of person you will be happy with as your spouse.

I make a distinction between controlling behavior which is manipulative, and deciding a what kind of person aligns with your flavor or dynamic of a relationship that you choose works for you.

one way is manipulative and the other is having strong enough boundaries so that you don't keep yourself in an unhealthy relationship.

If you and your husband don't agree on the behaviors that you are OK with, it is not going to work.

But realize that there is NRE that is experienced due to a person, but the is also NRE to sexual experimentation. Some people don't readily acknowledge these aspects and that heightened arousal of threesome sex plays a big role in triad failure

It isn't specific to threesome sex or triads, that in general sexual excitement will often cause spouses to agree to boundaries that they don't intend on not crossing.

The problem isn't coercion, it's that sex is a very powerful emotion and sometimes people go a little NRE of the sex alone. If your spouse doesn't understand that facet of NRE and how it can damage your relationship then it only increases the chances that your marriage will become a non-monogamy casualty

So I would say be patient and understanding, but I don't think you need to let another's person's rights and rules dictate the dynamic of your marriage or any relationship.

polyamory dot com does for the most part have a 24/7 patrol so be just know that as a matter of their rules, they error on the one side of this argument, which is to assume that the relationship you desire is desired because you are controlling.

And that is only true if you are. But by no means is it wrong for you to take full responsibility for the relationship style that you know makes you happy, and find a person with compatible outlook.

People change, and that's OK. The commitment of marriage is not about ownership but being committed to working things out, and yes society has placed some restrictions on who you can offer your life, to share, to become a part of your chosen family.

And my point of view is they got you to believe in it was NOT OK to you to freely chose, that it was NOT OK for you and those involved with you to be the ones to decide the criteria, framework, boundaries and or rules to live by

and I view that as believing Lies, because you are not wrong for deciding that criteria and it was they who were wrong

You believed and took counsel from confused people, I would not break free of those shackles, just to run across the state line and chain yourself to just as confused "poly" shackles

it would be much more wise to try out the boundaries

IF YOU DESIRE TO

but I wouldn't chain up to the rules of the other side of the fence if I were you.

I know that when you flee oppression the grass looks greener, but do you not here the same rhetoric, in some cases even worse?

You may want to hug the fence line until you are free from all oppression, or at least until the day you can stand up and say "fuck all that noise" "no" and "fuck you" or "fuck off" because often times that is the only words manipulative people understand.
 
I don't believe that having an insecure attachment style means it is fine to act unreasonably in relationships.

That seems like a response to my earlier post, so correct me if I'm wrong and just acting defensive for no reason. It's hard to be sure without a quote.

I didn't say that having an insecure attachment style means it is fine to "act unreasonably" in relationships. I said it is reasonable to request agreements that help you feel more comfortable.

Merely requesting agreements does not itself infringe on the autonomy of others. They have every right to refuse those agreements.

From the sounds of it, her husband doesn't care one way or another whether he goes to sex parties, and upon deeper reflection, he prefers not to go. So, it's really no skin off his back to agree not to go.

Another way to look at all this is that no outsider has the right to dictate what agreements people inside a relationship are allowed to make. If two people want to make stupid agreements about dumb things, that's their prerogative. It's not kind to harp on them for making agreements that you wouldn't make yourself.

If, for some ridiculous reason, it made Gralson uncomfortable for me to wear vinyl corsets, I would gladly agree not to do that. I have no burning desire to wear vinyl corsets. It doesn't matter if, to the rest of the world (and even myself), that Gralson's request is ridiculous and unreasonable -- I don't care one way or another about wearing vinyl corsets. If making that agreement will bring him some kind of comfort, then I'm free to place his comfort above my fundamental right to wear vinyl corsets. Not because he's manipulative or because I'm a placater, but because I really don't care about wearing vinyl corsets.

I didn't have a secure attachment style and now I do. Making that transition wasnt easy and it required a lot of doing when I didn't necessarily feel but as I learnt more about myself and more about people generally, I began to do and feel. If you wait to feel, it'll never happen. Shits too ingrained

The thing to realize is that overcoming insecurity is a choice. In your opinion and experience, it's a good choice to make. But it's still a choice. People are free to make their choice not to overcome it. People who choose not to overcome it ought not to be treated as inferior or weak.

Choosing not to overcome your insecurity does not negate your right to make requests of your partners. Anyone has the right to make any request of any person at any time. Anyone has the right to refuse any request made of them. Autonomy can only be lost when it's given up freely, or taken under force. Merely making requests, no matter how unreasonably they might be, does not deny a person's autonomy.
 
The husband broke the agreement, I suspect he did so because he wants to go to sex parties or doesn't want to go to sex parties but wants that to be his choice, not hers. So old fashioned illogical rebellion.
 
Once a week

I know you were speaking hypothetically and that your husband probably isn't interested in sex parties anyway, but supposing you were in a situation where you had to pressure him into agreeing not to go...[/QUOTE]

No it's not a hypthetical situation. I'll try to be clear.

My husband and I opened up because I met a boy and wanted to have a fling. His part was that he had always wanted to explore SM clubs. Emotionally that doesn't bother me. I didn't have an issue with it because he wasn't going to even have intercourse.

Then things changed. He wanted a girlfriend, OK, I dealt with and encouraged that. The person he chose is very much into the sex scene - she goes to sex "parties" to hang out with her friends, she used to host such parties, she goes to sex conventions on a regular basis.

Now me, yes, I have sexual issues. I was raised Catholic. I was phycologically unable to watch porn or have an orgasm until over 40. I have explained a lot of the other experiences that have colored me. I have worked VERY VERY hard to not be selfish. To open up and be healthy. Even having a husband go have sex once a week is a huge thing Most people could not do.

Here, and I guess it's because folks are very liberal, I don't feel I get a lot of credit for already stepping way outside the average.

Sex parties were the last step. They went one a year ago and he lied to me regarding what it was. Then the other night again they were going to one and he said he 'didn't pay attention to were they are going."

This is all exasperated by having to relate to his metamore who is someone I have nothing in common. Whose lifestyle I neither understand nor agree with and having the challenge of being accepting.. Also, I feel she can't understand that that one night a week means i am left with a ton of responsibilities. I think the anger partly comes from the fact that I could never leave overnight once a week - all hell would break lose.

But I have worked had to work through things. I don't feel I have to except sex parties. I don't care if they only chat or don't have sex or only fuck each other. It's not something I want in my mind or life.
 
choice

The husband broke the agreement, I suspect he did so because he wants to go to sex parties or doesn't want to go to sex parties but wants that to be his choice, not hers. So old fashioned illogical rebellion.

I can see why you would say that and I thought that at first. But it is 100% inaccurate.My husband went to the sex parties because he has trouble in every aspect of his life doing what he thinks others want. Period. SM clubs are something he seeked out on his own. He never spoke about private sex parites before.

If she had been really into eating raisins in the rain, he would have felt compelled to do that too. The good thing here is he is going to have to grow up and decide what HE WANTS.

BTW: you are endorsing lying. Isn't that a no-no?
 
The thing to realize is that overcoming insecurity is a choice. In your opinion and experience, it's a good choice to make. But it's still a choice. People are free to make their choice not to overcome it. People who choose not to overcome it ought not to be treated as inferior or weak.

I agree and it's a choice I have made. But it's a hell of a lot harder than saying "I chose." If you were raised by parents who neglected you and then experiences many deaths at an early age (for me beginning at 19) it takes a huge amount of therapy, self-reflection, and meditation to get past that. Clearly, just by the fact that I can BE POLY or an writing about it, means that I have done tons of work.

London, without sacrasm if you were raised in a secure family and have not experienced large amounts of death or abandonemt.. If you can trust that people will never leave you or you will be OK if they do, so you don't need to set ANY boundaries for your comfort level, I an genuinely envious and happy for you.
 
I've had a fairly chaotic childhood actually. I don't know why people assume I must have had it "easy" for me to have the views that I have. In actuality, I have those views despite the hand I've been dealt. And I'm not endorsing lying at all. What I mean is that you behave reasonably and ethically even when your issues are prompting you not to. Even now, ill say things like "i really want to do this unreasonable thing because this thing makes me feel like that", but I'll laugh as I say it because I know the thing I want to do is totally unreasonable for whatever reason. It takes practice, but sometimes you have to do the behaviour before you actually feel like behaving that way.
 
Well! I think some progress has been made on this thread. I also think the bickering about how to deliver information and opinions between Shrodingers and London should stop. It's distracting from the OP's issues. IMO.

I am in therapy and working on it.

Good! Keep it up. I would imagine practicing poly is difficult when you have baggage around sex and trust. Whether the baggage is from your childhood, from hanging out with a guy who was into meth, or whether it is from actual issues between you and your husband (your low libido, and what you called his "weakness," his people pleasing behaviors).

Unfortunately, I disagree with most of you.

It's cool you disagree. Sometimes when we are confronted with a new way of thinking or behaving, our first reaction is "NO! I would never do that." But when you see that approach working for many, you then think, "Well, I can see it works for them, so it's not completely invalid." And then one day you find yourself trying out the approach and finding it also works for you.

My husband and I live together and are raising a family. I feel totally within my rights to ASK him not to do certain behaviors that I think are unhealthy and make me feel emotionally threatened.

Several things in these statement hit me the wrong way. Yes, you can ask him not to do certain things. He has the right to disagree and refuse.

If you think something is so "unhealthy," ie: the sex parties which you envision as huge orgies where everyone is having sex with everyone else and everyone are relative untrustworthy strangers, you might want to think again. As someone said, sex parties do no imply a free for all. Some people are only watching and not fucking at all. Some couples are only fucking each other, and only getting off on watching others fuck. Some people might have some kind of sex with some of their friends. As you said, your h's gf has many friends at her parties.

I guess a few people might hook up with strangers. You could've asked your h if he planned to fuck strangers, or just watch, or just have sex with his gf while others watched them.

I don't like kink/sex parties much myself. I really dont get off on exhibitionism or voyeurism much. I find it all kind of tawdry. A few times since I've known my gf however, she has gone to kink/sex events with a another partner. I was nervous about her going, but I didn't pressure her to not go. And she told me she was too shy to do much in public, she just planned to watch. She did get hog tied, and an artistic cutting, but she didn't have sex with anyone. *shrug*

OK, going back to your post, you say: "[Certain behaviors or choices of my husband's] make me feel emotionally threatened."

NO ONE can MAKE someone feel anything. Your feelings are your own. Own them! A better way to put it is to say, "When my h does X, I feel Y." This empowers you and doesn't put your life, your feelings, your decisions how to act under the control of others' behaviors. You can feel what you want, no matter what your h or his gf do or say. Do you see how this empowers you and takes pressure off your h to resort to his "weak" people pleasing behaviors?

He has decided not to go to these parties with his gf. Did he really make this decision because he has really decided he doesn't like them, or did he make this decision because you pressured him, and he is "weak" and a people pleaser and afraid of losing you? What if tomorrow he decided to please his gf instead of you? Everyone here needs to take responsibility for their own choices and decisions.

You saw only behaviours that DIRECTLY affect me are viable to ask - everything else is controling. But this DOES EFFECT me. It makes me not want to be close to him and not want to have sex with him.

You could look at why your husband's sexual exploration has become something so threatening to you. Yes, you had childhood trauma. Yes, one person told you they went to a drug fueled orgy that turned bad. Don't try to make your h responsible for feelings you have about past experiences of your own. Take back the power! It will serve you well down the road of poly and relationships in general. Even with your kids. You seem to have weak boundaries. Every time you feel something, you think it's someone else's fault, and you also seem to want to dictate your kids' sexual behaviors down the road, imagining having to confess somehow that your h went to a sex party, but sex parties are bad, don't do it, kids, OK? (You know the minute you tell a kid not to do something, they are going to want to do it, right? :p )

There are many behaviors we ask partners not to do - for example buy the 4$ cheese versus the 8$...is that controlling.

When you share finances, you do make agreements about spending money wisely. But sharing his body is your h's choice. It doesn't impact YOUR body unless you are overly bonded and think his body is yours. That you own him, in fact. This is something we deal with in poly. Autonomy. Independence. Fucking others. Occasionally sleeping apart. Interdependence instead of unhealthy co-dependency.

I am confused because on another post I saw many people who won'y allow their primary to date someone until the meet them. THAT stirkes me as much more controlling. COME on!

Yes, that is a bit controlling as well. Some people are really afraid when they first become poly. I think most more experienced polys don't need so much reassurance. Yes, it's nice to meet someone your partner is truly dating. But to have to have a partner inform you, "I am at a party and met someone attractive. May I kiss her?" is giving up personal power and autonomy. It implies ownership. Again, this is only healthy in a D/s relationship where one person gives up much power because it's a turn on for them. D/s makes concrete the struggles others sense only subliminally.

Cut me some slack. How many people on here agree that their partner can date whoever they want and ask for no boundaries. My boundaries seem A LOT less extreme. We are not required to "OK" someone. I didn't even meet husband's GF untl they had been dating 4-5 month. Husband rarely meets any of my dates and only met two long-term boyfriends once or twice.

I think part of my issue is that I really want to be fair and empathetic to the folks in my life and emotions often contradict that. I have to allow myself to feel the way I feel and not beat myself up.

Aha! Yes. Perhaps you had feelings of yours belittled or denied when you were a child. Now, give yourself permission to feel your feelings. Own them, validate them, name them, work through them on your own, in therapy, and in conversations with others.

Also, people here *and his girlfriend* do not ackowledge that sex parties are WAY WAY outside of the boundaries of average society.

So... sex parties seem too alternative to you. But they hold an attraction for your husband. Can you respect him enough to allow him to explore this or any other non-dangerous situation? Sure, you don't want him to do something dangerous and life-threatening, but if he's not in danger of actual physical harm, why are you so afraid? Because of fear he will like it too much and he will choose his gf and sex parties over you... Fear of loss for whatever reason is a common cause of jealousy in poly. Fear of being compared. Fear of being seen as "lesser than."

Most people in poly come to understand it's ok to have one's partner get certain needs met elsewhere. We find we don't have to be our partner's "everything." You feel the sex with the gf is kinkier, better, more fulfilling than with you... So, you tell dh, "Don't go do that sex thing with her!"

What is wrong with this scenario?

She wants sex parties to be a big part of her life (and yet another secret).

That is her choice. You're not dating her, you don't need to judge her. You can question why your h is attracted to her, and learn more about your h. It is always good to learn more about your mate.

Husband says he doesn't want to go to them because he has erection issues and feels insecure.

Oh! Well. So, he's still curious about the sex parties, but feels shy and feels a need to have a hard-on at the sex party? Thinks he wouldn't get hard watching others have sex?


She sees most of her friends at these sex parties and my husband is her FIRST real relationship - she is in her 40s. I am not trying to be judgemental - rather explain how we are so very difference. My habit would be to go to a friends and talk for two hours about childrearing or rape ot whatever. GF relates to people through sex parties and has numberous friends that she rarely sees outside of that...I just can't view this as healthy.

I am writing this because she isn't going a way and I feel I have to relate to someone whose lifestyle I don't relate to at all.

You don't need to "relate" to her. You're not dating her and you don't have to be her friend. Sit back and watch your h's relationship with her unfold and learn something about HIM from it.
 
My husband and I opened up because I met a boy and wanted to have a fling.

So you got exactly what you wanted out of your arrangement but you seem to be limiting what your husband gets out of it? And how was your husband's relationship with your "fling"?
 
bofish, you don't want to be called weak because you are insecure, yet you call your husband weak because he is a people pleaser. Seems a bit of pot calling kettle black.

I wonder if his gf is at all aware he was agreeing to go to the sex party just because she wanted him to, and now he's flip flopped because you DON'T want him to! When do you stop trying to control your h's choices? When does he make a decision based on his own desires and not on someone's else's?
 
Mag - this is all excellent advice: thank you. This is an excellent point.

Do you see how this empowers you and takes pressure off your h to resort to his "weak" people pleasing behaviors?


YES he does do this:

What if tomorrow he decided to please his gf instead of you? Everyone here needs to take responsibility for their own choices and decisions.

OK, because he does this also.


"Yes, one person told you they went to a drug fueled orgy that turned bad."

It's important for me to talk about the fact that this is not accurate. WHAT happened was I had two gay boyfriends. One was a sex addict and did not take his med and died of HIV at age 42 two years ago. The second (who had been a close friend since childhood) ended up participating in gay meth orgies every weekend for years. This nearly killed him and nearly killed our relationship.

I am trying to explain the difference between emotion mind and intellecutal mind - rationally, I know these parties are safe...emotionally I can't even begin to come to terms with it.


"Aha! Yes. Perhaps you had feelings of yours belittled or denied when you were a child. Now, give yourself permission to feel your feelings. Own them, validate them, name them, work through them on your own, in therapy, and in conversations with others."

yes yea and yes

"Because of fear he will like it too much and he will choose his gf and sex parties over you... Fear of loss for whatever reason is a common cause of jealousy in poly. Fear of being compared. Fear of being seen as "lesser than."

yes yes and yea

So what would the most skill behavior be... to say I' d rather you didn't go and leave him to his own. What if he agrees not to go and does anyway?
 
You have to let go of being concerned about whether he goes or not.
 
Unfortuately, my experiences are not just "a few bad ones." Everyone in my life since childhood has had negative sexual issues - which vary from being left alone at age 8 in the living room while mom fucked boyfriend to one friend dying of HIV and another being a sex/method addict. Unfortunately, these things stay in your body.

I couldn't have an orgasm til over 40!

I WANT to be sex positive. I want to be open. If anyone has any ideas of how to feel that way in light of being taught the opposite since early age - please share them! How do I begin to heal from all this negativity ?

Ok I am gonna take a stab at this. I too along w many others on this forum are also or have been "victims" of other ppls abuse... however, it is truelly up to u to get past whatever events traumatized you to this point. Seek professional counseling is my advice. We can all give u our perspective on being sex positive, but it is u who must find ur way to being sex positive. Put simply, I understand how others actions made u a victim, but u are an adult now and u will continue to be a victim until u come to terms w ur past. Whatever that is.
 
Your discussions about sex parties, particularly the drug parts and losing a friend to HIV, are pretty much identical to another user who was here with pretty much the same question a while back.

http://www.polyamory.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30617

That wouldn't to be you, would it? I fear that you didn't like the answers you got then so you came back hoping for different answers this time. I'm afraid you won't find them. We're usually fairly consistent on the point of controlling the behaviour of metamours.
I was reading this thread thinking I KNOW I HAVE READ THIS EXACT SAME STORY ON THIS BOARD BEFORE.
THank you for finding it-because I have a crapload of homework to do-and don't have time to search.

I tend to agree.
We (myself and Maca and myself and GG) agree that sex-parties are not an option.
BUT if one of them opted to participate in them-I would stop having sex with them. It's a matter of MY right to choose what I do with my body. But it's not my place to tell them that they CAN NOT do something with their body that doesn't pertain to my body.

You don't have to understand it. But you could try to accept it. He agreed not to go to them, and later decided he didn't like them either. You could take that as evidence that if he wanted wild sex more than the intimacy he finds with you, he would have left already.
 
Back
Top