I'm not sure how I'm conflating polyfidelity and polyamory... Polyfidelity would seem to be a subset of polyamory in which all participants are closed to being in relationships with anyone other than the other people within that grouping. It's still polyamory, because the people involved have loving, committed relationships with more than one person.
You admit you're speaking from your own experience when you say that people who are in a polyfidelitous arrangement have "one big bed," but then when other people say they've seen differently in their own experiences, your responses seem to be telling them they're wrong. On what basis? They're wrong because their experiences are different from yours? There are people in polyfidelitous arrangements who all share one big bed, and there are others who don't. There are those who share rooms and those who don't. There are people in polyfidelitious arrangements who do not even live together. Which is why I'm asking why cohabitation is a given in a polyfi arrangement. It is a thing that can happen, but it is also a thing that doesn't have to.
Likewise, some people might see it as a "plus one" situation. Many others don't. From the beginning, I've made it clear to Hubby that there's no "plus one" in our arrangement. I'm legally married to Hubby, but I didn't "add" Woody to my life. I met Woody and formed a relationship with him, in which there is currently discussion going on of long-term plans together, some of which include Hubby as the other factor in my life.
You're saying I'm giving "questionable factoids" and "contentious questions with no risky input" (whatever it is you mean by "risky input"). You've stated as facts that people who are polyfi live together and are open about their relationships, and you've stated as a fact that people in a V or triad, especially if they're new, are going to see the arrangement as a "plus one" deal. So I'm not the only one doling out "questionable factoids" and not backing them up. Your statements of "fact" are based solely on your own experience, by your own admission, which means they are true for what you've seen... but not necessarily for every poly person in the universe.
You admit you're speaking from your own experience when you say that people who are in a polyfidelitous arrangement have "one big bed," but then when other people say they've seen differently in their own experiences, your responses seem to be telling them they're wrong. On what basis? They're wrong because their experiences are different from yours? There are people in polyfidelitous arrangements who all share one big bed, and there are others who don't. There are those who share rooms and those who don't. There are people in polyfidelitious arrangements who do not even live together. Which is why I'm asking why cohabitation is a given in a polyfi arrangement. It is a thing that can happen, but it is also a thing that doesn't have to.
Likewise, some people might see it as a "plus one" situation. Many others don't. From the beginning, I've made it clear to Hubby that there's no "plus one" in our arrangement. I'm legally married to Hubby, but I didn't "add" Woody to my life. I met Woody and formed a relationship with him, in which there is currently discussion going on of long-term plans together, some of which include Hubby as the other factor in my life.
You're saying I'm giving "questionable factoids" and "contentious questions with no risky input" (whatever it is you mean by "risky input"). You've stated as facts that people who are polyfi live together and are open about their relationships, and you've stated as a fact that people in a V or triad, especially if they're new, are going to see the arrangement as a "plus one" deal. So I'm not the only one doling out "questionable factoids" and not backing them up. Your statements of "fact" are based solely on your own experience, by your own admission, which means they are true for what you've seen... but not necessarily for every poly person in the universe.