hedgehog
New member
I don't go to swingers' clubs, but I also don't judge swingers as more or less moral based solely on their choice of swinging as a lifestyle. However I might judge particular swingers as more or less moral depending on how they conduct their lives. For example if they were dishonest or hurtful or irresponsible. However I don't believe we can simply assume those morals apply to everyone in the group, or for that matter almost any group, as a whole. This is why I don't think it's fair-minded to hold any judgementalness toward swingers. To be called a swinger should NOT be considered an epithet. IMO it should simply be a morally neutral label that identifies a particular lifestyle preference.I dunno. Swinging is on that same plane as hotwifing, and I can tell you that a lot of people in that community literally think of someone as a walking set of genitals. I know there are a lot of swingers like that too. I think the ones having more of a relationship may be the exception rather than the rule. Have you been to a swingers' club lately??? They can be pretty gross. And this is from someone who likes going.
In contrast, I would say that historically speaking, polyamory has placed an emphasis on moral behavior. This is laudable, but also creates problems, because morals are highly subjective and often based on socialization rather than any attempt at universal principles ( e.g. the objective truth ). In fact, here on this particular forum, there is an aversion to attempting to pin-down what is and isn't true. The infraction I received not long ago was called "True Poly-ing". For those who believe that the truth matters ( a lot ), this is a very difficult position to be put in. I'm not even sure right now that I can talk about it without receiving another infraction. But I am taking the risk with the hope that the mods can see that the content is being delivered objectively and respectfully.
Last edited: