IndieSolo
Active member
poly is a movement even if you don't this likely fact.
No, it isn't. Your logic is flawed.
Polyamory is generally defined as:
". . . the practice, desire, or acceptance of intimate relationships that are not exclusive with respect to other sexual or intimate relationships, with knowledge and consent of everyone involved. It may or may not include polysexuality (attraction towards multiple genders and/or sexes).
Polyamory, often abbreviated as poly, is often described as "consensual, ethical, and responsible non-monogamy". The word is sometimes used in a broader sense to refer to sexual or romantic relationships that are not sexually exclusive, though there is disagreement on how broadly it applies; an emphasis on ethics, honesty, and transparency all around is widely regarded as the crucial defining characteristic." (from Wikipedia)
Polyamory, often abbreviated as poly, is often described as "consensual, ethical, and responsible non-monogamy". The word is sometimes used in a broader sense to refer to sexual or romantic relationships that are not sexually exclusive, though there is disagreement on how broadly it applies; an emphasis on ethics, honesty, and transparency all around is widely regarded as the crucial defining characteristic." (from Wikipedia)
A movement, in the sense that you mean it, is defined as:
". . . a series of actions or activities intended or tending toward a particular end: the movement toward universal suffrage.
and: ". . . a diffusely organized or heterogeneous group of people or organizations tending toward or favoring a generalized common goal: the antislavery movement; the realistic movement in art."
and: ". . . a diffusely organized or heterogeneous group of people or organizations tending toward or favoring a generalized common goal: the antislavery movement; the realistic movement in art."
While there may be some organized movements or organizations with goals that would benefit polyamorists, there is no one unified goal among polyfolk and therefore no one "poly movement." To keep insisting that there is one, simply because a lot of people practice/live/identify as poly and may be ostracized or criticized for it, is ignorant. An example: a great many people play online games, making it an important part of their lives, and some people cannot fathom what the attraction is and criticize "gamers." Would you say there is a gamer movement just because a lot of people do it and are met with disapproval for it? No, of course not. There is a gamer sub-culture, however.
It is more correct to say that there are polyamorous sub-cultures in various places (this is an international forum, so one should not assume that whatever you experience where you are is experienced in the same way in all the places our members live). However, there is no general, across-the-board "poly movement."
Last edited: