MsEmotional
Member
I read all the time about how polyamory allows people to negotiate for their needs and design the relationships that they want, rather than the relationships that are pre-designed by the relationship escalator. Does anyone have any resources about how to do that? Like specific guidance about how to negotiate for what you want in an ethical way?
Ponytail and I have been growing a D/s dynamic over the last year. It has been really amazing, but it has also been really intense. I have recently come to the conclusion that I don’t know that I will ever be able to be okay with him seeing other people if he is submissive to me. It’s hard to understand — at least for other poly dominants that I have talked to — but it is impossible for me to simultaneously “own” him and allow him to seek out other partners. It just fucks with my head.
So, it seems that we need to choose one or the other. Not wanting to limit his ability to see other partners and not wanting to put him in a position where he would be tempted to cheat, I told him that I thought I should stop being dominant with him. It seemed like the ethical choice. Certainly more ethical than telling him he has to be monogamous when I am not.
But as soon as I suggested it and he said he understood, I completely regretted it. I don’t WANT to lose the D/s dynamic, I just feel like I have worked so hard to make it work with our ethics on relationships and it just....isn’t. So I immediately realized that what I had suggested as the “ethical” decision wasn’t what I wanted. I feel like what I was really doing was giving him an ultimatum — you can either have non-monogamy or you can have me as a fucking amazing mistress, but you can’t have both.
I feel like there should be a way for us to both negotiate for what we want, but I don’t know where to start.
(PS, we have communicated about all of this, of course. He understands the cognitive disssonance I feel as a dominant with a non-monogamous submissive. He has tried to explain to me that he just feels differently — that to him he can still feel owned by me even if he is in a relationship with someone else. I recognize that he feels differently than I do, but the idea just doesn’t sit right with me.)
Ponytail and I have been growing a D/s dynamic over the last year. It has been really amazing, but it has also been really intense. I have recently come to the conclusion that I don’t know that I will ever be able to be okay with him seeing other people if he is submissive to me. It’s hard to understand — at least for other poly dominants that I have talked to — but it is impossible for me to simultaneously “own” him and allow him to seek out other partners. It just fucks with my head.
So, it seems that we need to choose one or the other. Not wanting to limit his ability to see other partners and not wanting to put him in a position where he would be tempted to cheat, I told him that I thought I should stop being dominant with him. It seemed like the ethical choice. Certainly more ethical than telling him he has to be monogamous when I am not.
But as soon as I suggested it and he said he understood, I completely regretted it. I don’t WANT to lose the D/s dynamic, I just feel like I have worked so hard to make it work with our ethics on relationships and it just....isn’t. So I immediately realized that what I had suggested as the “ethical” decision wasn’t what I wanted. I feel like what I was really doing was giving him an ultimatum — you can either have non-monogamy or you can have me as a fucking amazing mistress, but you can’t have both.
I feel like there should be a way for us to both negotiate for what we want, but I don’t know where to start.
(PS, we have communicated about all of this, of course. He understands the cognitive disssonance I feel as a dominant with a non-monogamous submissive. He has tried to explain to me that he just feels differently — that to him he can still feel owned by me even if he is in a relationship with someone else. I recognize that he feels differently than I do, but the idea just doesn’t sit right with me.)
Last edited: