My understanding is that Hamish didn't lie, but actually believed the marriage was over.
My understanding was that he lied. But regardless of whether he lied or believed what he said, asking would likely have garnered the same response: reasserting what he'd already said.
Additionally, it would seem a peculiar and sad world where we have to constantly ask about what we've already been told.
Lots of people will "lie" by omission, but answer truthfully when asked directly. Their definition of lying only means "saying something they know to be untrue." To these minds, "not mentioning" is completely unrelated to honesty.
True. And yet, as said above, what kind of world does this become if we all come to expect that we need to ask about what we've already been told? If we have to constantly assume we're being lied to about something or other, if we have to constantly guess which of the things we were told today might be a lie, and thus which things to ask about again?
There are more than enough reports on this forum of partners openly sharing text conversations with metamours like it's no big deal, and to many of them it isn't. The fact that the people you and I know are more respectful of privacy doesn't entitle us to take it for granted.
Assuming privacy is just foolish. Assuming anything is foolish.
As I remember, in this case, Hera was new to poly. Having been in normal monogamous relationships before, it likely would not have occurred to her to assume her private texts and emails were being shared, because in prior relationships, they wouldn't have been. And yes, sorry, but there are normal, default ways of doing things. Of course there are exceptions to the rule-- which only clarifies that there
is a rule.
Again, what kind of world would this be if, in order to have interactions, we have to start from Ground Zero in each and every relationship, clarifying every single expectation, behavior, action, questioning every word, etc.? There are thousands upon thousands of such individual actions, etc., such that we could not function without some common ground, and things that can be assumed about what is proper, and therefore reasonably expected behavior.
You're right that plenty of posts here show that people assumed privacy and got burned. I'm one of them. I have no idea if his wife ever read my e-mails, but that's not the point. She had complete access to what I thought, quite reasonably, given I was told this was like any other relationship by the so-called poly expert (XBF), were private messages. Nobody bothered to tell me otherwise.
I would counter that if we're going to accuse people of assumptions, it's a much worse assumption to just
assume that your new girlfriend knows her private texts and e-mails may be read by your wife, and to assume that she's fine with that. Why would anyone
assume such a thing, given that a relationship, by its very definition, involves some level of privacy between two people?