Hello, I am in a hierarchical polyamorous relationship where we are navigating a conflict regarding our "messy lists" and past boundaries. Early on, I expressed discomfort with my partner dating people from a period in his life when he was unfaithful to a previous partner (and friend of mine).
We briefly explored the idea of making an exception for one specific person, since he really wanted to. I was open to getting to know her, and for them to figure out what they wanted. But after they spoke, my partner ultimately decided not to try, since he was doubting if she was ready for polyamory. She has been cheating on her partners for many years. And in her current relationship, after he found out, they opened up, but she had a hard time with the idea of him being with other women.
We then decided for a total "no-past-lovers" agreement in our relationship and I thought we were happy with it. Recently, my partner very suddenly retracted his support for that agreement, after I said I could see she liked a shared post we had online and asked how that had panned out after we decided to have this agreement. He told me he had actually never told her, but that he had just ghosted her and showed me the messages.
He is now claiming he only agreed due to feeling pressure and is demanding the space to pursue this specific person.
He has framed my boundary as a lack of "open-mindedness," and has stated that if I don’t allow them to explore, his resulting resentment will end our relationship. I feel like my safety needs are being reframed as personal failures in this case.
He says that ppl usually have real reasons for putting certain people on the "off-limits" list, and that my reasonings are not enough. Would you agree?
The reasons I preferred if he did not date this woman in particular is because she has had a tendency to cheat on her current partners, and he said he had multiple conversations with her about how problematic that is, and she didn't seem to be able to stop. And when her partner realized and asked her to be open so he also could be be with other ppl, she didn't like it and was considering ending their relationship. For me, all of this is signaling attention need, bad impulse control, lack of consideration of others and not really genuinely wanting ethical non-monogamy. If she does not want her primary to date other women, why would she accept that my partner is with me, if they also date?
I just don't feel comfortable, but now my partner took away our agreement and left me in this position where my only reason to still be with him is if I accept it or if he decides (again) that he does not want it. I am shocked because he is usually someone that cares about the team.
I am also shocked that he would choose the chance of pursuing her over the 4-year relationship we built together. (We've been talking about having kids next year). This woman is not someone who is present in his life. (He had not thought of her in half a year until I mentioned her name, and when I said her name, he realised he had bypassed himself, and wants to be with her, actually.) Technically she lives in another country. They would meet maybe once a year usually, but now he wants to go there more often. But he also says he might decide he does not want to be with her. But he loves her.
I'm just confused.
What do you get from this? Does anyone have similar experience?
Thank you for taking the time to listen to me.
We briefly explored the idea of making an exception for one specific person, since he really wanted to. I was open to getting to know her, and for them to figure out what they wanted. But after they spoke, my partner ultimately decided not to try, since he was doubting if she was ready for polyamory. She has been cheating on her partners for many years. And in her current relationship, after he found out, they opened up, but she had a hard time with the idea of him being with other women.
We then decided for a total "no-past-lovers" agreement in our relationship and I thought we were happy with it. Recently, my partner very suddenly retracted his support for that agreement, after I said I could see she liked a shared post we had online and asked how that had panned out after we decided to have this agreement. He told me he had actually never told her, but that he had just ghosted her and showed me the messages.
He is now claiming he only agreed due to feeling pressure and is demanding the space to pursue this specific person.
He has framed my boundary as a lack of "open-mindedness," and has stated that if I don’t allow them to explore, his resulting resentment will end our relationship. I feel like my safety needs are being reframed as personal failures in this case.
He says that ppl usually have real reasons for putting certain people on the "off-limits" list, and that my reasonings are not enough. Would you agree?
The reasons I preferred if he did not date this woman in particular is because she has had a tendency to cheat on her current partners, and he said he had multiple conversations with her about how problematic that is, and she didn't seem to be able to stop. And when her partner realized and asked her to be open so he also could be be with other ppl, she didn't like it and was considering ending their relationship. For me, all of this is signaling attention need, bad impulse control, lack of consideration of others and not really genuinely wanting ethical non-monogamy. If she does not want her primary to date other women, why would she accept that my partner is with me, if they also date?
I just don't feel comfortable, but now my partner took away our agreement and left me in this position where my only reason to still be with him is if I accept it or if he decides (again) that he does not want it. I am shocked because he is usually someone that cares about the team.
I am also shocked that he would choose the chance of pursuing her over the 4-year relationship we built together. (We've been talking about having kids next year). This woman is not someone who is present in his life. (He had not thought of her in half a year until I mentioned her name, and when I said her name, he realised he had bypassed himself, and wants to be with her, actually.) Technically she lives in another country. They would meet maybe once a year usually, but now he wants to go there more often. But he also says he might decide he does not want to be with her. But he loves her.
I'm just confused.
What do you get from this? Does anyone have similar experience?
Thank you for taking the time to listen to me.
Last edited by a moderator: