Unicorns & Unicorn Hunters - Merged Threads, General Discussion

A couple seeking a girlfriend is no less ridiculous than a single woman with kids seeking out a single man of a certain age and income bracket...

People will criticise a woman for her shallowness just as much as unicorn hunters, maybe even worse. I recall a thread on a kinky forum when a flame war occurred after a woman said she had no desire for a short dom... Drama!!!!!

Imagine a thread starter like: "I'm single, but I only want a rich man." That wouldn't be ignored, either. People get annoyed when we see others create boxes and expect others to fill it, leaving no room for variation.

I spent ages talking to a married man the other day, before he said, "But my wife is bi, so she needs to be considered,"

"And what has that got to do with anything"? I asked.

"Because the women will be sleeping together," he replied.

"But why do you have that expectation?" says I. (Bear in mind there was nothing about this on the profile).

"It's not an expectation. It is a requirement. We come as a package deal." Boom.

Yes, it is frustrating.

Those couple/gf triads either fall apart or evolve, just like any relationship, monogamous or non-monogamous.

It wouldn't be so bad if there were not a trail of often homeless, broken-hearted unicorns left in the wake because they dared to not live up to the 'love us both equally' expectations.

Just sayin.'

But why wouldn't people on this forum, especially those who have gone through it on one side or the other, not want to help these people in this situation?

People do try to help, often, and also try to help them avoid not getting into these situations in the first place.

(What is this, Versailles circa 1809?)
Psst... French Revolution. *whistles the Marseillaise* ;)
 
No one gets frustrated dealing with the same issues over and over again from mono partners dealing with jealousy for their poly partners, or people trying to move from cheating to polyamory.

You obviously don't read my posts
 
What about the wives and husbands who suffer the fallout of a triad gone bad?

I also have an issue with people with a POP clause to their poly life.
 
What about the wives and husbands who suffer the fallout of a triad gone bad?

Of course, I tend to write from the single woman's view, because that is what I am. But I do acknowledge that sometimes things can go bad for a member of the married couple, also. Wasn't there a bloke here the other day whose wife moved in their partner without telling him and he feels totally pushed out of the way?

Then there are the women whose husbands run off with the unicorn. It's not only the single woman who gets hurt.

The point is, rarely is everything equal, it is just not very sustainable.
 
If I was a cowgirl, I'd target unicorn hunters.
 
I have no problem with triads/quads/etc. Find them to be the most stable relationship structure, even more so than monogamy (I know four is supposed to be the "most" stable number, at least in numerology, not sure where it comes from, really). So a quad would be the most stable? Maybe? Not important.

You are in a triad and find it to be stable? I was in a mono marriage for over 30 years. We were pretty damn "stable." Supported by society, by the goverment, our families. I'd say mono relationships are the most "stable" in our culture because they are the norm.
I do think that so many couples do group relationships very poorly, which makes it all the more frustrating for those of us who very much consider the needs of all involved.

I am glad you are considering the needs of all. Generally people are more self centered.
 
london - ha!

Speaking from within a not-yet-triad situation, I can say (based on an earlier comment by london, I think, plus something Natja said) that one of the NICER things, for me, is that I'm not the sexual centerpiece. That whole porn FMF thing? Yeah, not so much.

When reading around, my wife gets irritated by the suggestion that she "became" bi to please me. Yuck! The concept is awful. It doesn't describe her and her "mostly straight" ways. She doesn't see herself as bi or polyamorous, not at all. She has a girlfriend, but even the word "girlfriend" bugs her. AM is part of her life. They make love, are best friends. They don't name it. She's just AM. AM feels the same way toward her.

Frankly, neither wants to be associated with "poly" when they see the attitude of conversations on boards like this. It's one reason this thread is interesting to me, seeing the space of responses, but I'm different from the two of them...
 
I should have actually expanded on that a bit, because I was continuing the conversation about the instances where one of the existing couple gets hurt, as opposed to the unicorn. If I was intending to find a polyamorous person and do a cowgirl move, I'd target unicorn hunters (as opposed to a poly couple open to a triad) because they already have the instability necessary for me to worm my way in. I believe this makes up one group of couples who are harmed by their unicorn hunt.

Also, with typical unicorn-hunting couples, the chances that one of the dyad aren't really on board with the poly thing, and consequently want to pull out, are high. Unfortunately (for them) the other person doesn't always want to pull out, and either leaves them, or cheats after saying they'd break it off. And we have another group of couples who end up the aggrieved party when the triad implodes.
 
london - ha!

Speaking from within a not-yet-triad situation, I can say (based on an earlier comment by london, I think, plus something Natja said) that one of the NICER things, for me, is that I'm not the sexual centerpiece. That whole porn MFM thing? Yeah, not so much.

When reading around, my wife gets irritated by the suggestion that she "became" bi to please me. Yuck! The concept is awful. It doesn't describe her and her "mostly straight" ways. She doesn't see herself as bi or poly, not at all. She has a girlfriend, but even the word "girlfriend" bugs her. AM is part of her life, they make love, are best friends, don't name it. She's just AM. AM feels the same way toward her.

Frankly, neither wants to be associated with "poly" when they see the attitude of conversations on boards like this. It's one reason this thread is interesting to me, seeing the space of responses, but I'm different from the two of them...
Definitely on Fetlife, but I think I've seen women here, too, who readily admit that they aren't really bisexual, but think with enough practice, they will be. Sometimes it will be a kink-based relationship dynamic that compels them to attempt this, other times not.
 
Being in...a triad...and also part of what I call an N... I suppose I could talk about either side of this conversation.
... people who write in talking about their personal circumstances (say, starting married, and perhaps opening things up in small steps, or enjoying being with couples because they like the dynamic of joining something established) and get pounced on with questions that others seem to not get asked. Have you thought of THIS? Have you considered THAT? And so on. Many of the questions imply that the member of the couple, or the person joining a couple is a dumb-ass, or self-centered, or rude to the others in the relationship, or lacking in the wisdom that is this forum.

First of all, I like being pounced upon. By cats, kids or a lover! But piled on can be oppressive, which is probably what happens to innocent, naive, downright ignorant unicorns and unicorn hunters, when they come here looking for advice.

...Wait a minute, they are on a board with hundreds of members, asking for advice, and they get a ton of it, from well-meaning people, and then they feel piled upon! Well, if you don't want multiple opinions, maybe you shouldn't go to a message board. heh. Go read sites like morethantwo, go read a couple books, go find a poly-friendly therapist. Don't ask for advice here and then be mad when you damn well get some. If you just want information and support, see above.

I know the mods here want us to all be gently supportive at all times, and can and do ban members with more abrasive personalities. I know sometimes I am more abrasive than I should be, but shit, these same kinds of people just keep coming here over and over again, with their unicorn boxes and traps, thinking they are so unique, and the exception to the stereotype!

Which may be true. Yeah, people opening up don't know what people who have lived this way for a while know. But the pouncing is what looks different.

As a former unicorn hunter, with 14 years' perspective on THAT experiment (my ex and I opened our relationship in 1999), I speak from both sides. I was the bi wife looking for a woman to share with my straight husband. We found one, and as often happens, she immediately preferred my husband. I got no sex, no cuddles, no romance from her, and he and she were soulmates, in NRE, chatting for hours. He was all twitterpated. Here I'd been his partner through thick and thin for 20 years, and suddenly she had supplanted my place, and, I felt, had more attraction for him than I did. Or at least, just as much. It was really weird! I wasn't expecting the tidal force of NRE.

Previous to starting our hunt, my husband said I could have veto power. If I were ever unhappy with this arrangement of sharing a woman, I came first, he'd give her up. After giving their relationship several months, I was extremely unhappy (since she wasn't into me, since she was taking so much of his time, attention, and OUR money, and because I felt he was neglecting our children), I did veto. Then they were both broken-hearted, and he punished me passive-aggressively for the veto he'd granted me permission to use.

I became so depressed at our failed experiment, and the result of the veto, that I got clinically depressed to the point I was screaming/crying daily, couldn't get out of bed, needed Zoloft and 3 years of therapy.

Now, in retrospect, I also feel bad for my husband and his gf! It wasn't fair to them, either. We all suffered greatly.

So! Excuse me for "pouncing," unicorns, and those that hunt you. I am only trying to save you from the horrific massive depression our hunt produced.
 
Like Magdlyn, I made a disastrous mistake also. I am not really able to talk about it still, as it is too painful (really dedicated people can easily find out). But I would never, ever want anyone to go through what I went through. I wish people wouldn't cling to this fantasy, I really do, because I don't want them to feel that sort of pain. But I DO realise that people have to make their own mistakes, also. It is hard to find the right balance, sometimes.
 
Like Magdlyn, I made a disastrous mistake also, I am not really able to talk about it still as it is too painful (really dedicated people can easily find out). But I would never, ever want any one to go through what I went through. I wish people wouldn't cling to this fantasy, I really do, because I don't want them to feel that sort of pain. But I DO realise that people have to make their own mistakes also. It is hard to find the right balance.

I am sorry for your pain, Natja.

The thing is, the darn innocent or stubborn unicorn hunters that come here, maybe even after going through several women already, but still wanting to find "the right woman," they don't know it's the form of the relationship, not those women they rejected (or were rejected by) that is at fault.

Sharing a woman does not prevent jealousy!!! It can actually increase it. For example: Imagine a threeway, where the husband is so excited to be with this new hot woman, he spends most of the so-called threeway focusing on her, while his wife is off to the sidelines waiting her turn. Finally it's her turn! He comes to fuck his wife, gets his penis in her vagina, and.... it wilts. Imagine the wife's humiliation! Imagine his dismay at his NRE-craving cock. Or imagine him not being dismayed, dismounting from his wife, and getting back to fucking the gf.

(Something similar happened to me in a foursome a couple years back. My gf's ex (from 10 years ago) came to town. She was a swinger. We decided to have a foursome with my young male play partner. He was so excited to be with someone new, he fucked her five times in the course of the evening and into the next day. In that time period, he tried to fuck me once, and wilted.)
 
I really do not have a problem with triads. I also could care less about those single women who seek couples, or those couples who seek single women.

My only grievance is with those that want this perfect woman to fit into a box. It is like they miss the part where the woman has a personality, thoughts, a voice, style of communicating, wants and needs of her own. She has a high standard to meet even before the first day. These couples usually have been together for years, are well-established, and they just want someone to tagalong to the well-oiled machine. She is just automatically supposed to be gung-ho about three-way sex and all this togetherness. She is usually not allowed to be alone with the husband. The wife may or may not be bisexual. Sometimes she is just exploring that side. She might have to be okay with babysitting, disrespectful little brats, and never being allowed to have children of her own--specifically if it is poly-fi, and the male has either had a vasectomy, or the wife is not okay with said woman having children by her husband, or any other man, for that matter. (Last time I checked, women control their vaginas and right to reproduce.) Sometimes the woman even has to be in the closet, because the other two loves of the triad are unwilling or unable to come out. Second-class citizen status is too good for these women. Some are treated like less.

It sounds awful. I cannot imagine how it feels for the newly-added person in these situations.

I forgot the best one of all... They tell this woman that she must date both, and if the relationship ends with either of them, the whole thing is kaput. Nevermind that she will be left heartbroken, and even homeless, if they invited her to live with them.

Admittedly, I have posed questions to those singles and couples alike. It is out of curiosity and wondering why. (It is no different than if I were to ask a mono woman why she prefers tall men with muscles and sandy brown hair, or a man who makes six or seven figures a year.) Never to demean them, because the truth is that this one right here could not give a fuck what they do with their lives. I am not losing any sleep, and my quality of life is not being reduced, so it just does not matter. I am curious because I have no preferences, as I do not experience primary/sexual attraction, so it is interesting to find out why people seek what they do.

I would be an epic fail if I were single and seeking a couple. I hate three-way sex. I had one threesome last year and never again. I barely liked having sex with two people, and I was a-okay when my second relationship transitioned to non-sexual. So the odds of me falling for both people in that couple and loving them both? Hell would freeze over first. I would have to experience that special connection, and it has only happened five times in the years I have been dating. Very rare. The last time was when I met my ex-girlfriend... in 2000. Since then, nothing. I have only been sexually attracted to one man in my life, and he is the only man I have ever been intimate with: my husband. I am not a candidate for a triad from either side. I respect those that are.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, neither wants to be associated with "poly" when they see the attitude of conversations on boards like this. It's one reason this thread is interesting to me, seeing the space of responses, but I'm different from the two of them.

My guys feel the same. They became so disgusted with the behavior in the "poly communities" they've encountered, and the conversations on this board, that neither have anything to do with any "poly" talk, groups, social arenas, etc. They just live their lives, and socialize with whoever wanders into their lives, and go from there.
 
@fulloflove Weren't you in a triad where you had certain restrictive expectations of your girlfriend concerning her baby making? I'm sure I read that in an old thread recently. That's not to say your feelings didn't evolve over time, if it was you, just you'd have more insight into someone who does have those expectations and how they feel perfectly reasonable at the time, at least.
 
@FullofLove Weren't you in a triad where you had certain restrictive expectations of your girlfriend concerning her baby making? That's not to say your feelings didn't evolve over time, just you'd have more insight into someone who does have those expectations, and how they feel perfectly reasonable at the time, at least.

It was not really a restriction. I am more inclined to believe it was my own red flags going up screaming red alert. I had just had a baby months prior and a very difficult pregnancy. I had a lot of stressful health issues during my pregnancy and after the birth. My hormones were batshit crazy, too. Never suggest something ludicrous to a sleep-deprived, stressed-out, second-time mum. I will tell anybody I was not even remotely a-okay with the idea of another child. It could have been the Virgin Mary herself at that point, and I would have been like, "Bitch, have you lost your mind, and more importantly, do you need help finding it?" Different person and different circumstances back then? Who knows? Everything has changed, so that is not even in the realm of possibility. All I know is my ex? Not a chance in hell.

So yes, my feelings have evolved, and now that I know what my ex is about, and what her intentions were with that situation, thank you God it did not happen. That poor baby would have been leverage in her sick and twisted game. This was by her own admission. She was a good person, but she does not need to be anybody's mother. Thank heavens she knows it. The day my daughter asks, "Who?" when someone asks her about my ex will be a wonderful day. I want her to forget that nightmare.
 
I find this enlightening, all this talk about triads and "unicorn hunters." So many terms for me, a newbie, to learn. But what I take away from this, is that everyone just wants to make everyone else feel loved in the relationship. Isn't that the way it is supposed to be? I mean, when someone in your circle looks at you, don't you want to feel loved, wanted and respected? It seems to me that open communication is always the key, and you should never do what you don't want to do, or be "pushed" into being anything you don't want to be.

We haven't found our "other," and don't know who it will be, a man, a woman or a couple. We aren't in any hurry. If it happens, it happens.

Personally, though, I hate titles and just think you should be free to love, like, feel affection for anyone you choose.
 
As for the labels, they bug me. "Unicorn hunters" and "swingers" are looked down on. Who gets to decide this?

I acknowledge that I have some contradictory opinions when it comes to labels. On the one hand, I want nothing to do with them. But on the other hand, everyone gets really attached to theirs, and they don't want me to take theirs away.

The challenge is that labels are only useful in conversation if everyone agrees with the language. If I pick up a bottle on the grocery shelf and the label says "ketchup," then I know what my hotdog is going to taste like when I pour it on. I shouldn't have to write to each manufacturer to make sure that all the bottles of "ketchup" are basically what I expect them to be. Within the label of "ketchup," I expect to find variations in seasoning. I don't expect each brand of ketchup to taste identical, but I expect them all to "taste like ketchup."

That's why I get so pedantic about language and labels. If someone calls themselves a unicorn, that word has a meaning that is generally understood in the context of "unicorn-hunters."

It's important to understand the order of events. First, there were people who looked to "complete" their relationship with a very specific type of woman with virtually unattainable characteristics. Often, they disrespected the autonomy of the woman they were seeking. Who gets to decide that disrespecting someone's autonomy is deplorable? I do. And I'm in good company.

So, first these people were out there doing this thing. It was only when they reached a critical mass that other people went, "Wow, this is really a 'thing.' Let's give them all a name so that we can refer to them more easily. They're looking for something imaginary. Unicorns are imaginary. Let's say they're hunting unicorns."

It simply wasn't the case that first there were these women out there looking for couples to date, and they were like, "Hey you know who else likes to date couples? Unicorns. So I'm going to call myself a unicorn, because that means someone who likes to date couples." No. Unicorns are just horses with magical poles sticking out of their foreheads.

Someone called me out for all of this, contradicting my tag. I don't believe that it does. You see, labels ARE sticky. They come with connotations and assumptions. When you define yourself with labels, you inherit all those assumptions, like it or not. So if you're going to slap a big sparkly sticker on your forehead, it's probably a good idea to do some research first and make sure you really understand what that sticker says, and how others will interpret it. Because when you find that out after the fact, you'll realize that it's left glue all over your skin.
 
Wait a minute, they are on a board with hundreds of members, asking for advice, and they get ton of it, from well-meaning people, and then they feel piled upon!

Like Magdlyn, I made a disastrous mistake also. I am not really able to talk about it still, as it is too painful. but I would never, ever want any one to go through what I went through.

And that's just it. By and large, these arrangements explode like the Challenger. The fact that the most recent thread to trigger this conversation "again" was yet another "I don't understand why my unicorn story didn't have a happy ending" is only more evidence AGAINST this whole approach.

What kind of logic dictates:
Them: "I applied this label to myself. I went out seeking to fulfill my label. I fulfilled it, and then it crashed, and now I'm not happy. What went wrong?"
Me: "How about abandoning the label?"
Them: "DON'T JUDGE ME!"
?

Honestly, I don't believe it's wise for anyone to deliberately seek out specific relationship models, with rigid expectations and catastrophic consequences if things don't go exactly as planned. I think it's a bad idea for monos, polys, triads, and any other type of relationship model you can come up with. From all the relationships I have been in personally, observed in real life, and read about here and on other forums, it's become abundantly clear that the best relationships develop when you abandon your intent and just let life happen.

The other thing is that I think unicorn hunters delude themselves. They probably genuinely believe that they're a perfectly happy couple with no real issues to work on, and nothing but sugar and roses to share with their special woman. But c'mon. If you were that happy, you wouldn't feel the need to search, desperately, for someone to complete your family. You'd be too busy staring dotingly into each other's eyes to have time for spending hours and hours scouring the internet and local groups for this woman. So it's really no wonder that these things blow up, because nothing highlights major cracks in your foundation like building a second floor on your house.
 
Last edited:
I believe you could be right, SC.

I look at how most of these couples describe themselves, and it sounds perfect. "Still madly in love, open communication, been married 16 years to my university sweetheart, love to cuddle, love to take long walks on the beach, have exactly 2.5 children, a dog, and we just need a third/woman to complete us and our family." With all of that gushing happiness and perfection, who needs more?

Honestly, I don't believe it's wise for anyone to deliberately seek out specific relationship models, with rigid expectations and catastrophic consequences if things don't go exactly as planned. I think it's a bad idea for monos, polys, triads, and any other type of relationship model you can come up with. From all the relationships I have been in personally, observed in real life, and read about here and on other forums, it's become abundantly clear that the best relationships develop when you abandon your intent and just let life happen.

How incredibly true.
 
Back
Top