But you can't reason with this. I've crossed the bridge and I'm about to burn it behind me, hunker down, and hope they don't build boats.
That kinda sums it up.
What I mean by "Clap For Tinkerbell" is not at all restricted to just the people who
hoped for Bernie &
hoped for Hillary -- not at all. See, back early in the Bush Lite era, I tried to get the attention of the preening Wingnuts on a lefty discussion site, pointing out that they were NOT "Republican" in the same way that (say) "Hot Tub Tom" DeLay was a Republican. "You think your vote bought you a seat on the bus. But if you ever need any actual support from 'your' party, they'll tell you all the seats are booked, & you're SOL." They didn't comprehend, which was unsurprising.
And that's not to pick the easy target. Look at all the people who "supported"... well,
anyone. Talk to your friends, look around you --how many of those "supporters" actually
worked a phone bank, or
went door-knocking, or (to be crass)
donated at least $1,000, or even
attended a rally?
Not one in a hundred so much as put up a lawn sign.
Yet 99.9% will claim to have "supported MY candidate" plenty... by
thinking good thoughts.
Here's some handy "Clap For Tinkerbell" for the Google-impaired:
Clap If You Believe in the Tinkerbell Effect (Gizmodo) --
...get their name from the scene in the stage play of Peter Pan during which Tinkerbell is dying and the audience is told to clap if they believe in fairies. Perhaps there has been an audience that failed to clap (and I would love to know if the actors prepare for such a thing), but generally they clap, and Tinkerbell springs back to life.
The Tinkerbell Effect works in a lot of different experimental situations. People believe that they can, with the push of a button, make a random flashing of lights into a coherent pattern, even though the button does nothing. In one case, a group of people were put in a room and told to concentrate on making the lights on a circular display move counterclockwise. They thought they did. What they didn't know is that they were in the same room as a group of people who were told to make the lights move clockwise and also thought they did.
One study ... told people to estimate the speed of gray dots moving across a black background. The dots were on a screen - a split screen. The other side of the screen had another field of gray dots, which the person doing the estimating controls. With the push of a button, they can speed up the pattern, or slow it down, until it matches the dots on the other side of the screen.
Forty percent of the time, the dots on the other side of the screen weren't moving. Twelve out of the fifteen volunteers still felt they were able to "match" the speed in all cases. One of the remaining three couldn't see the dots move, whether they were moving or not.
Clap Your Hands If You Believe (TV Tropes) --
Also known as the "Tinkerbell effect," which is itself a subcategory of what is known as "magical thinking," a belief in cause-and-effect relationships between uncorrelated events based on coincidences.
This trope isn't a Magic Feather where "confidence" merely allows one to use one's own abilities to the fullest -- this physically changes the Universe.
When turned up to a global or universal scale, this can result in a "consensus reality" — a world completely created by what people think rather than its own Ontological Inertia.
For those who don't even need to clap, see Reality Warper. A Tulpa is a creature that derives its existence from this force. Compare with Willing Suspension of Disbelief. See also All Myths Are True, Psychoactive Powers, Puff of Logic, & The Treachery of Images.
The problem with attempting to calmly, reasonably point out any smallest detail in the huge pile of Wingnut fallacy? Well, any skeptic invited to a seance knows how THAT plays out -- "The spirits cannot manifest in the presence of
an unbeliever!!" And there's no coming back from THAT, no chance of consciously accepting a brain-washing.
This creates a vicious cycle for non-believers, as magical events are "disproven" in their presence because they don't believe in the first place, thus cementing their disbelief.
See? If Right Wingnut policies fail to work as promised, it's because there wasn't enough clapping!

When Bush Lite's massive tax cuts for businesses & wealthy people didn't result in MORE tax revenues -- yes, that's how it was marketed -- George then stepped up & said, "well, that's because we need to cut MORE," & he was being as sincere as he knew how. The GOP ran the White House, both sides of Congress, most states, a majority of SCOTUS... yet somehow they couldn't make anything work because of those Liberal unbelievers harshing the vibe with their negative thought-waves.
Back then, too, George liked to proclaim, "I have a mandate!!" which I really did suspect was because
Jeff "Bulldog" Gannon (the "rough trade" prostitute) was visiting again.

The problem with taking the word at face were legion: he'd lost the popular vote to Gore, polls indicated he was even
less popular among nonvoters, he was ineffectual at getting the GOP pointed in one direction. Wingnuts quack about Obama's low approval numbers, which at 46% don't threaten Teflon Bill's 55%... but certainly kick ass against Junior's measly 30% (rebounding from 22%, a record-setter even against Nixon's 24% crater). His staff finally stopped writing "mandate" on the teleprompter.
Two weeks ago, Trumps said he has a mandate.

That's when I accepted that it ain't gonna be pretty.
This time around, though, they get to carry loaded weapons. And not only don'tthe Wingnuts feel they have any need to be reasonable; that would (to them) demonstrate weakness, & like weak people through eternity, this emboldens them to violence.
Call me a cynic, but being righteous, calm, positive, well-spoken, organized... all necessary, & truly underutilized, for sure. But not enough to save anyone.
"Psychotics build castles in the air. Schizophrenics live in them."
Spork, there might be some remaining grains of goodness & sanity in your ex, but do you really believe he'd feel remorse for beating someone to death who happened to clash with his imaginary world?
Anyone else seen the
"Le Petite Tourette" episode of
South Park? Cartman soon realizes that there are consequences for learning how to defeat the little day-to-day disciplines we all have. I believe that the world is now a grim parody of Cartman's problem, increasing hourly:
there is no longer an upside to self-control. Racism, sexism, homophobia, antiintellectualism, generalized xenophobia...