This is so interesting. The responses I've gotten are very different from the responses I got in 2010, when I was encouraged to try poly in spite of the pain (and I am very glad I did). I wonder whether that's due to changing norms,
Yes, it appears to be due to changing norms. For years here now, I have not seen anyone with experience advise anyone else who is struggling to just meet their metamour and all will be well. I do not see the support for previously mono couples to struggle on with their triads or quads. More likely people will be told that triads and quads, especially prescriptive ones, are overwhelmingly likely to fail.
For example:
I get a lot of people new to polyamory insisting that they must date together, or meet people together, because it "will be less complicated." I see this in comments on social media, on dating app profiles, on couple's profiles on social media (that black and red one that starts with an F...
www.readyforpolyamory.com
or to differences in the situations as I presented them.
No. Your situation is especially sad because you are only doing it to please your husband and hang on to him. You justify your martyrdom by telling yourself you are "creating more love in the world" and "getting scraps of his NRE passion passed on to you." This is obviously no longer working for you.
Out there in the swinging world, one hears about women whose husbands are likely to stray going along with them to swing clubs and having sex with men and women they are not attracted to, just to please their husbands. They are actually sharing the most sacred parts of their bodies with unattractive, even repulsive strangers to preserve the status quo of their marriages. Gently... what you are doing is similar. You lived with your husband's gf, and you took care of him, and are still taking care of his ex's children, to "show goodwill" or something. You thought you were at least done with watching husband date others and enjoy his NRE, while you sat home with the kids. Now he's started up again and you just. can't. take. it anymore. You blew up at the new gf. You're having a nervous breakdown. Of course you're going to be advised to stop doing this to yourself.
Btw, I am curious. This seems to be a mono/poly set-up. That's your choice?
I was expecting to get support for the part of me that wanted to accept this, and instead I got support for the part that needs to say no. And I think that is the part that actually needed the support, so I thank you all.
You're very welcome.
As far as meeting metamours goes, though, I would definitely need that if there is any chance of me being OK with poly. The situation 15 years ago changed from unbearably painful to doable after I met her. If I don't at least know her, then the mystery torments me.
It's not enough to just "be OK" with poly (or mono/poly). Ugh. Again, set the bar higher.
It's fine that you liked your metamour after you met her. I didn't really meet Pixi's bf Malachi for seven years, his choice. He is introverted, and was dating Pixi, and didn't need or want a poly family. I was fine with that. Pixi showed me pix of him, told me enough about him for me to know he was a fine person. I trusted her, and saw she was happy, and that was all I needed.
Pixi would have preferred for us to hang out as three sometimes, since she loves us both. But that didn't happen until the pandemic lockdown, when we closed down to only seeing the three of us and my adult son. (I didn't have a second serious partner at the time covid hit.) That was when we started having occasional potluck dinners together. Even then, we all got together only once every 2-3 months.
I thought that KTP versus DADT was a matter of individual preference and need?
DADT is an extreme of disconnect that is barely polyamory. One partner is so unhappy with her spouse's dating of others, she just wants to pretend it's not happening. Usually this leads to a huge disconnect in intimacy between the members of the original couple. Or maybe they were already disconnected, and the marriage is one of convenience or social status only, so they just don't care what their partner is up to, as long as they are discreet.
Yes, parallel, kitchen-table and garden-party polyamory models are matters of preference. I had not heard of this "lap-sitting poly" until today. haha. I think that would fall under the triad or quad category. If you are dating your partner's partner, that person is both your metamour and your lover. Extremely complicated!