First, the whole "dating someone from work" thing. Usually, people around here will advise against it because of ickiness that can occur when encountering an ex multiple times during the workday, especially if the job is stressful.
Me, I have other reasons, particularly that it's somewhat delusional.
Studies of how (monogamous) people found their "soul mates" repeatedly demonstrate that "the only person in the entire world that I could ever love" just
happened to be working nearby, or living on the same floor, or attending the same class at the same time, or regularly taking the same bus, etc. (rather than, say, on another floor or two buildings away, or using different transport).**
Repeated exposure is seen as some sort of Romantic nonsense like "God's will" when it's actually just
the propinquity effect setting off an initial
limerent obsession.
When the novelty fades (which it does), repeated forced exposure to the "disappointing" other results in an especially rapid collapse of goodwill. One (maybe both) feels the other's "divine" nearness to now be intrusive, even threatening.
________
** -- Of course, there's other commonality points, like being introduced by a mutual friend, or getting chatted up by an interesting stranger in a slow grocery queue, but these are surprisingly (to me) unusual.
________________
I'm going to step back to the root post first -- well,
posts, now -- & point up a few things that look like core miscommunication.
We both took this kink quiz online. One of the things on there was non-monogamy
the questions about poly were super obvious
Polyamory
IS NOT "kink"; bdsm
IS NOT polyamory. Sexual nonmonogamy
is not polyamory.
he did not seem invested in that relationship and seemed more to be stringing her along.
We were at a point that we weren’t progressing
Called
The Relationship Escalator: thinking that it can't be a good relationship unless it keeps "improving" by having more demands piled upon it. People who think like this are often dismayed at how one relationship after another fails the same way.
It's Monogamist nonsense & has no place in polyamory.
Poly was not a rash decision, we had talked about it for two years.
Very unclear here who the "we" is. In any case, it's a very big leap from "nattering about the fantasy" to (say) discussing the ramifications, attenting public meetup groups, being active on sites like this, etc. IME, lots of people who talk
about something are actually talking their way
around it, commenting on the proverbial elephant in the livingroom but careful to not question what it's doing there in the first place.
From the start he knew that I was poly.
Okay, then that is on him... if accurate.
You weren't polyamorous. At that point, you had no actual
experience at maintaining multiple on-going intimate relationships, & were still at the stage of "wow, it sounds like such a totally groovy idea, & you should be my co-guinea pig."
With all the expectation/demand for threesomes, you're muddling "polyamory" with "nonmonogamy" with "kinky fun." IMO, you're leaning toward
open monogamy, where you'd have one "real" relationship & maybe some ongoing FWBs for occasional naughtiness.
Did he have any previous exposure to the
term? How well did he understand the
concept? How much study has he done in the past seven months? How about you?
And how good is your own understanding of polyamory? In barely a half-year, you (PG) alone have shifted through three relationships. Both of you (NJ & PG) have exhibited difficulty with maintaining ONE relationship, & are impatient to toss a few more onto the stack.
On the surface it looks a little like you've used
Neonjoe (& "poly") as the "reason" to break up with your troubled eight-year relationship (rather than work on it), & now might be using him to transition to open monogamy & so are focusing on his "failures" to make the eventual breakup smoother.
my coworker said things like he was okay with my dating my primary but he wasn't sure how he would handle anyone else.
Now, see, THAT is much closer to actual
polyamory: he understood his limits, AND he communicated them to you.
The contract
NJ agreed to was "I am willing to be in a vee with you & him."
PG then said "you accepted that contract, & I decided to change it (without consulting you) to include whoever else I want to be in a "real" relationship with, & you're being unreasonable for not immediately bowing to my
needs."
Him and I have talked about threesomes with males or females and hes stated he would do them. Now that we are in a relationship, he seems less inclined towards that matter.
Again, you're using the relationship as leverage to change the contract in your favor. You specified
threesomes, NOT vee/triad, & in a context of
nonmonogamy &/or
kink, NOT polyamory. Having got him to agree to "occasional kinky fun," you again revised the contract, then demanded he accept your "needs" --
I can't really just have sex without an emotional/mental connection. ... there has to be a relationship there.... Not just a fling. Like I don't want two separate realtionships.
So, not only does PG need to pursue other ongoing relationships,
BUT if NJ doesn't participate in
everything then he's being a callous jerk.
To restate the theme, that's NOT what he agreed to. He has a right to balk at ANY sudden unilateral changes. There's nothing in polyamory that supports weaselling.
I don't think he is okay with that, or anything really.
Please explain the "anything" part. It seems ominous.
He seems to given me an ultimatum of if I date anyone other than my primary(a sexless unhappy relationship) hes going to date people
What problem do you have with NJ dating other people?
(By "dating," do you mean "hanging out at Starbucks," or "fucking"? Is "fucking other people" the problem, or is it more "fucking other people without making it all about ME"?)
Stating "I cannot go past this point" is not an ultimatum. You intend to break the contract; NJ intends to hew to it. Therefore, it's YOU who have issued a tacit "take it or leave it" & are having difficulty accepting that he is considering the latter despite your awesomeness.
He said well I am sorry but I am not poly.
Well, that's because
he's not. A common noob error is to believe that fucking multiple people means that THEY are somehow therefore "poly," guilt by association... or maybe "infected" is a more appropriate analogy.
And again, he seems to've made an honest statement, only to get flak for not spitting out the "right" answer.
Can I have some outside perspective here?
Certainly:
end it.
- Neither of you seems particularly happy.
- Neither of you seems particularly trusting of the other.
- Neither of you seems willing to seek (much less find) some middle ground away from your various preconcieved visions of the future.
The only way this can proceed in a positive fashion is if BOTH of you set aside all the extraneous nonsense & highfalutin' Romantic fantasies about launching One Big Fucking Family, & learn
how to fix stuff.