New triad but not working out.

RestsInReason

New member
Apologies for the long post. But I'm at my wits end I don't know what to do to keep my partner and myself happy.

Background: I am a gay man in my early 30s and I've been with my partner of 9 years before we decided to enter this triad. We've attempted one triad previously but the person who joined us only told us he had feelings for me and not my partner a year and half into the relationship. We gave it a go 1-1 in a V setting for a bit but that didn't work. I left my partner for a brief period to find out if things would work out with this new person and eventually was burnt and patched things up with my stable partner.

Drained from opening myself up to two and having lost one. I told my current partner that if he still decided to find another (as I can't bottom for him and he's versatile while I'm top) he would have to take lead. But I wouldn't be ready for awhile

Anyway 2014 was a difficult year and we didn't explore much. But a person I got to know on one of those location based apps started getting to know my partner through one of the social media platforms after I had chatted with him and explained the situation we were in. That we were looking to add a third if everyone involved had some level of romantic interest in everyone involved.

They met up first in december as I had a trip with the extended family (think kids kids and more kids) and I met up with the new guy in January when I got back. It was awkward at first seeing how they've been chatting much more frequently before meeting up but I did like X.

So we start hanging out a little more often. And my partner wants to take things further. I tell him that I feel that he definitely has feelings for my partner Y but I'm not so sure if he does have the same romantic feelings for me. But if my partner thinks that there's a possibility that there's some level of romantic interest between us all. I would give it a go, even if X's love for my partner was more than his for me.

Over the course of 3 months, I felt a disconnect with what I was told “that he had feelings for me” and just went along. There was time spent alone with X but it felt like X was just wishing Y was around more and that I was filler. All this while I was prepping food for him in the mornings for work, sending both X and Y to and from work. And yes they would hold each other’s hands or touch one another intimately in the car. I felt like I was their cab driver, and given the choice they would have gladly both sat in the back. Sure a hand would be thrown my way once in awhile but the intensity just wasn’t there.

X says he has a history of depression, and work was getting out of hand for him, making him miserable and clam up. And we both said we would support his decision to quit if it was really getting out of hand. He did.

I continue sending X to another commitment for 2 weeks, and even offered to give his friends a ride out of a pretty remote area. And my car bumper gets wrecked in the process. On top of that I was going through a 1 year anniversary of losing my grand father whom I was very very close to.

X tells Y that my mourning the loss of my grandfather was unacceptable that I should have gotten over it by then. And that the days following when I didn’t have a car to send him to camp or deliver food to him before camp really annoyed and inconvenienced him. And Y tells me I have to be the bigger man and give in to him.

So fine I relent and I vent. That unless he’s gone through losing a parent at 18 and grandparent who’s actually looked after him and he’s had to look after, that he should just shut up.

We mend, if only for awhile.

We go on a trip (the 3 of us) Y has work so the first couple of days was just myself and X and I thought things were going well. He was sharing a little more of himself and I tried to relate some.

But he suddenly about faces and clams up on me on the 2nd day. Apparently I had offered to cover any difference for some shoes he wanted but was calculating the price differences online and he didn’t like that. I mean my intention was that hey if it’s a small difference and he’s going to use it. Lets just get it. Utility over minute differences.

He throws up a wall, I asked him what’s wrong several times and he says nothing and just continues on the day.

We head to the gym, and I tell X that Y is dropping by later when he has time to pass me a card for a discount for dinner later that evening. All this while I keep informing of Y’s whereabouts and actions as I know X wants to spend time with Y. But he gets mad at me when Y drops by real quick to drop off the card and X doesn’t get to stop his workout to meet Y. (Even though I informed him of it when it happened)

So at dinner, he grunts to me, asking me to order food. I order dishes I think he’d like, but he tells me after the dishes have arrived that he’s had a shake at the gym and isn’t very hungry. I ask him what’s wrong and he just shuts me out again.

We leave the restaurant, with the food unfinished. I ask him what’s wrong and he tells me nothing, I ask him if he needs space to cool down or something as I can just head out to the roof deck and clear some work. And he insists nothing. So I put on my earphones and start clearing emails.

Y comes back from work to the hotel room and starts talking to X. X has the impression that my headphones are drowning out their conversation but I hear that X sees me as a friend and nothing more. Not as his partner. I mean he was complaining about the rest of the day, about how he didn’t get to see Y at the gym either. But I think the main thing was that he sees me as just a friend and not his partner.

I later tell Y that that that wouldn’t work for me, but I would still try to be there as I know how much X means to Y, despite it going out the rule (I thought) we all had agreed on going into this.

Each time this happens. I'm just made to feel like I'm the cause of any negative emotions, and I'm supposed to go give in and make things better, or Y's expected to step in and make things better.

The next day Y offers to buy the shoes for X and X doesn’t flare up at Y the same way he did me. So that really ticked me off.

And X proceed in saying that I'm making it all about me, but his words have been directed at me. “I had a bad day at camp, because I couldn't fetch you in without a car and had to ask the cab driver to detour to an ATM and ended up late; how X couldn't explain why “his brother” (as that’s what he had told his friends) couldn't pick you up from camp" "How X expect things of someone in the 30s and how I'm not living up to it." "How I'm too easy to offer you(X) things, whereas when someone else offers it, you don't get ticked off in the same measure"

Then there was dinner on our final night on the trip. I go on ahead to get us a table as I know it’s going to be a wait. He takes his time at the gym and makes Y wait for him After we are seated and have ordered food and the food’s arrive he says that he’s heaving a headache and wants to head off first and will see us back in the room. And I told Y there and then, that he would see X mopey in the room and he would end up comforting X. Cos that's the person Y is. He sees someone who needs comforting and does his best to. And I know X knows that as well.

We catch up with X eating elsewhere and his words were centric on Y. How X wanted to spend time with Y and how you didn't like the fact I was sharing our side of HK with X.

Then X run off on us. He was having a panic attack saying he had to leave And I pursue, knowing Y would want to but can't or might hurt himself in the process. So I pursue.

Then X proceed in saying X was developing feelings for me due to the fact that I didn't let him go. I'm sorry, by the same measure (X brought it up in a talk; that X wouldn't want to be in this if it was simply a question of X being available to try it out), my apparently availability shouldn't be a factor in your feelings toward me. No white knight syndrome please.


I said I needed time to think. And even through text I felt cornered, X stated on Wednesday that he wanted to be a good friend, that we would call this quits and we started talking as friends. But the next day X suddenly assume the role of the victim again. That I've taken so much from him and how could I possibly give up so easily, questioning me if I ever had feelings for him. And I felt like X were trying to make me give in once again. To give it another go.

Doesn’t help that I read an article posted on insead if we’re victims of the victim syndrome. And each line just seemed to ring true.


So where does that leave us? I don't want to give up Y. I know he's done a lot for me. But I can't be in this any longer either. I was ready to be friends with X and have lines drawn but now I'm not sure I can do even that now after he just swung things around the very next day and made me the evil one who apparently gave up too easily. Sorry but 3 months of false feelings is draining for me. Or is 4 the bare minimum? I mean X says he wants to try it again but I don't see a point if my heart's closed to X for the things he's done & said.

And I know Y still has feelings for X, and X for Y. Do I be selfish and ask Y to stay by my side? I mean I have probably driven Y to tears several times this past week. And it really pains me to know he's in pain. And he is in pain.

What option I have if I can't take the options they want me to.

Do I try and enforce what Y and I agreed upon entering this? If there’s no love for everyone we call it quits? Since I’ve closed off my heart from X as I do not want to become any more emotionally involved with X than I already am.
 
Last edited:
I think you should each find your own partner. Its unrealistic to expect that one persistent going to love both of you. Can't you just be friends with x?
 
I think you should each find your own partner. Its unrealistic to expect that one persistent going to love both of you. Can't you just be friends with x?


I thought I could remain friends with X, but he seems too adept at playing the victim, manipulating emotions, and that's why I personally do not want to get more emotionally involved with X.

And as Y's partner I would like to shield him from that but I know that that's his choice ultimately.
 
I'm sorry you are struggling. :(

I hope you feel better for the vent. Some people manufacture chaos . It is ok to want to be free of that drama. You think you might be a victim of victim syndrome. You feel drained. You don't like how X flips it around on you, manipulates, plays the victim, etc. This does not work for you. Your heart is closed to X. You've been burned enough times.

To me? It sounds like you know you need to break up with this triad to get away from X. And the price of admission could be going without Y. Whether permanently or temporarily because he eventually wakes up the drama X generates -- that remains to be seen.

So my suggestion is to not make your decisions based on what Y is doing right now. Y can choose what to do for himself to manage his pain.

Take it in micro steps. You could base your next choice on what is healthiest for YOU. To me that sounds like getting you out of this so you can start to heal.

Do I try and enforce what Y and I agreed upon entering this? If there’s no love for everyone we call it quits?

Yes, in the sense that you enforce it for yourself. There is no love for you here. You could say "There is no love for me here. I am calling it quits." You could tend to your stuff so YOU can feel better. You are not happy staying in this. Could get out.

Then deal with the next micro step after that. If Y is not wanting to accept you bowing out, guard against Y trying to talk you into staying in something that is not healthy for you. Could keep it simple. "I see you want me to stay. But I cannot stay in something unhealthy for me. I'm sorry."

GL!
Galagirl
 
Last edited:
Thank you Galagirl

That was my thought all along. X still tells Y that he doesn't want to break us up, yet is continually trying to get his attention.

Y tells me that he doesn't want to give us up either but he wants X as well and says he wants to work something out.

It's like two brick walls going at one another, I don't think he is hearing that I'm drained and done, so I will try and repeat that again.
 
Follow your own path.

You do not have to say "I am done here" more than once. You have to do it -- not particpate any more. You don't explain more, don't engage more. You do nothing.

His side of it is working through stages of grief to get to final acceptance. "Denial" is stage 1. So leave him to do his processing on his own.

As for the rest? My fav all purpose answer when people do that at me is "That's nice." As in "nice = accurate." Not "nice = pleasant."

Watch...

X still tells Y that he doesn't want to break us up.
  • That's nice. In future, please don't share this with me. (Is it Y telling you stuff?)

Y tells me that he doesn't want to give us up either but he wants X as well and says he wants to work something out.
  • That's nice. In future, please don't share this with me.

People making random announcements about how they feel/think right now? They are reporting their internal weather? That's nice/accurate for them. Doesn't mean YOU have to do anything about it.

You do have to do what is best for YOU. Even if they pepper you with random announcements/pressure for the next little bit. Just treat it like weather channel stuff that does not apply to you.

Augusta is 32 deg and cloudy.
  • That's nice.

Phoenix is 83 and sunny.
  • That's nice.

You just don't live there any more. So you don't have to pay close attention to it like you used to.

Galagirl
 
Last edited:
Noted Galagirl.

Well Y is away on a holiday with his family. We are supposed to meet to talk when he gets back.

I love your stance on using "That's nice" although I'm not sure if it's for the right reasons as I have a feeling it will drive X up the wall.
 
X's feelings are X's job to manage. Not your job.

My stuff vs your stuff. You may want to keep that in mind when you talk to Y. You have broken up with the triad. A lot of this stuff is just no longer your job.

You are also not doing anything MEAN when you mildly say "That's nice" and move on. It's like "Ok, that's nice" and you think to yourself "Pass the bean dip." Move it along. Don't gets sucked into whatever it is. Set your boundaries. If you have to process, process with people OUTSIDE the former triad. Not those within.

You aren't his friend and aren't talking to X much right? If Y has to deal with X drama, that's the price of admission to dating X that Y has to pay. You are not trying to date X any more, so you don't have to pay anything. If Y tries to dump his X problems on you? Could respond equally mildly:

"I'm very sorry you hurt. But I don't deal in X. You do. (Pass the bean dip.)"​

Nothing to do with you. More (my stuff vs your stuff) action so you can stay healthy.

If X has a deep drive for drama/chaos manufacture, then best thing you can do for YOU is to be as boring as all get out, bow out, steer clear. Don't get hoovered by X or by Y.

X might be deliberately provocative to illicit reactions for a while before he will shoo to find the stimulus he craves elsewhere. So be prepared for that. Some people like that want supply -- and you were a previous source of attention/services supply.

Be the boring faucet that ran dry. Nothing here to get.

Galagirl
 
Last edited:
Hi RinR, welcome to the board.

You will find many threads here about couples who try to form triads with another person, hoping and wishing that this new person will like/love/desire both partners in the original couple equally.

But think about it. What are the chances of that happening? There are so many issues around it.

Try reading So Someone Called You a Unicorn Hunter?

http://davidlnoble.livejournal.com/176039.html

It is a lengthy article that will show you the pitfalls of trying to force a triad to happen. Even though it is directed at a MF couple where the man is straight and the woman is bi, it will still be extremely relevant to your group.

Leaving out all the stuff you vented about in regards to money, and shoes and trips and taxiing, your so-called triad seems to want to take the shape of a V.

Your bf Y needs to learn how to be a good hinge. If he is telling you too much about what is going on with him and X, you can ask him to stop with the TMI, as GalaGirl explained.

If he is seeking a "bottom" and has found one in X, he has found what he is looking for.

If X is only interested in Y, could you just let this relationship take the natural shape it wants to take? It sounds to me like all 3 guys are trying to not hurt the others, but you can't force feelings of love and desire if it isn't there.

Poly works most easily and successfully if partners date as independent persons, not as a couple. You don't even need to be friends with X. Many times metamours do not hang out together as friends. There is no requirement for that. Being polite and cordial when you do meet him is all that is necessary.

Now, if you really fear X is trying to cut Y away from you, he is what is called a "cowboy." Let Y know you are committed to him no matter what, and make sure he is on the same page. Open and honest communication, and finesse and caring and respect, are needed here. If Y wants to be lovers with both you and X, he needs to know that he has to learn to be a good "hinge," and learn how to balance the needs of both his partners.
 
Hello Magdlyn, and thank you for the response as well as welcoming me to the board.

I will read through the post you had linked.

And I understand that no one can love both equally (learnt that all too well from our previous attempt at the triad) and that's why going into this one, we had both decided that there be sufficient level of romantic love for both for us to proceed. If there was love but just friendship with the other, we had said we wouldn't proceed.

I guess the metamour wanted to be in love with my partner so much that he faked the emotions at the start. And I'm not saying he didn't try to include me, but inclusion and emotion are just to different.

Once again thank you for the input I really appreciate it.

I did volunteer to step aside and let them have a go at it, heck I had a go at such a V hinged relationship in the previous triad, so who am I to deny Y that. I said calmly that I would exit this and if he came back I'd be very glad and I'm not faulting him for wanting to give it a go. But he said he needed to process that and that was just before he went on his family vacation.

I don't think X is knowingly being a "cowboy" I just feel like he hasn't been honest about his feelings and despite what he says his actions come across as him trying to get emotionally closer to Y and that's been the single consistent thing.

And with regard to finding a bottom in X, Y has said that he'd be happy to go back to a relationship with just us (just a week ago). it it came down to it but wanted to try and salvage the triad if possible. But a week's an eternity in this, lol.
 
I'm not sure I understand why you don't date separately. If a triad forms on its own, lovely, but requiring a person to have romantic love for you both is not only darn near impossible, it's a set-up that attracts people who are not all that self-possessed. I don't think many (if any) mature, stable, self-knowing people would enter a triad relationship promising to feel romantically for everyone involved.

Why don't you and your long time BF develop separate relationships, then just allow those to evolve naturally?
 
Last edited:
It is a common agreement with couples new to poly, to tell each other (but not any new partners) that if a triad takes shape where the new partner and only one member of the couple start to feel too many romantic feelings/love for each other, but the other member of the original couple does not feel or have returned that same love, the new partner will be dumped and the original couple goes back to being a couple.

Seems rather harsh. So the new partner is punished and rejected for honestly loving only one of the couple. And the member of the couple who loves the new person is also punished for loving the new person. Who really wins here? Even the partner who doesn't love and isn't loved by the new person loses, because now he is the bad guy keeping the newer lovers apart.

Too many unicorn hunters then blame the new person ("s/he just wasn't the right girl/guy") instead of the fact that it is the unrealistic expectations of this shape relationship (forced triad) that is to blame.
 
RestsInReason said:
I did volunteer to step aside and let them have a go at it, heck I had a go at such a V hinged relationship in the previous triad, so who am I to deny Y that. I said calmly that I would exit this and if he came back I'd be very glad and I'm not faulting him for wanting to give it a go. But he said he needed to process that and that was just before he went on his family vacation.

OP is not saying they cannot be together. Just that OP isn't up for a triad shape.

OP finds X off putting and rather not have him for a meta in a V shape either -- so just OP will bow out and leave them to it. They can be together if they want to. No hard feelings.

If it doesn't work out after all, Y can look him back up.

What more can he do here? :confused:

To me it sounded like it was Y who was hot for a triad where OP and X were willing to try but nope. Not feeling it.

RestsInReason, could you be willing clarify that is where you are at with this at point in time?

Galagirl
 
Last edited:
@Galagirl

You have hit the nail right on the head. Indeed I am not denying them the chance to see each other. But for my own sanity, I would need to distance from them both.


@HappilyFallenAngel I don't know, we might but if I do leave Y I will probably go through a period of singlehood before attempting to open up to another.


@Magdlhn I am not faulting or punishing either of them. But I was presented with the option to stay in and work on feelings which are no longer there (from my end for X). I really have no intention of hurting X or Y but I neither do I want to hurt myself by remaining.
 
Hi RestsInReason,

From reading your original post, I have to conclude that X is a very disagreeable person. If I were in your shoes, I think I'd try to distance myself from X as much as possible. If you live with Y, maybe now is the time for you to move out. Perhaps you could get a studio apartment somewhere? If Y wanted to visit you there he could do so as long as X wasn't with him.

I wouldn't worry about any previous agreements that X (or other new partner) has to be in love with both you and Y. That type of rule is infamous for causing troubles. Tell Y he can have a V as long as you never have to see or hear about X. That's my advice.
 
Hi RestsInReason,

From reading your original post, I have to conclude that X is a very disagreeable person. If I were in your shoes, I think I'd try to distance myself from X as much as possible. If you live with Y, maybe now is the time for you to move out. Perhaps you could get a studio apartment somewhere? If Y wanted to visit you there he could do so as long as X wasn't with him.

I wouldn't worry about any previous agreements that X (or other new partner) has to be in love with both you and Y. That type of rule is infamous for causing troubles. Tell Y he can have a V as long as you never have to see or hear about X. That's my advice.



Thank you for the reply.

I am trying to distance myself as much as I can from X but Y has told X that the only way for it to work is if X and I can get along. I do not want to force feelings which aren't there, as ultimately I feel it would all unravel.

Y and I do not live together, as his family isn't aware of his orientation. We live separately and I have told him (just minutes ago over text) that I would be fine excusing myself from this and letting him develop things with X. I just do not want anything to do with X. And he says that he doesn't want that as he would miss me and wouldn't want to be without me.

So I'm back to the position where he wants me to give it another go. I guess we have to meet up and talk it out. As he thinks it's all miscommunication on X and my own part. But Y hasn't yet been on the receiving end of Xs forced actions. And I don't think he understands that fundamentally his relationship with X and my relationship with X are at two vastly different points and I do not see a reconciliation.

X tried to explain in a group message to us, that his feelings and desires for Y were but an illusion, that he just wanted attention from Y as X had given up so much of him self physically to Y. That didn't sit right with me. I hope I'm not a jaded old fool, but it felt like here was someone who would say just about anything to get what he wants.
 
Last edited:
I am trying to distance myself as much as I can from X.

Ok. You can do that.

Y has told X that the only way for it to work is if X and I can get along.

Work for WHO? Y? :confused:

Because bowing out seems to work out ok enough for you. And (you + X) getting along is really not up to Y. Does he not see that?

If Y cannot keep it separate as the hinge so X stuff doesn't leak over to your side of the V? Or you vote "no confidence" on his ability to do that? Or he is pushing X on you as a buddy? Or X is saying /doing whatever with you to get what he wants with Y?

Too much drama.Stay gone and leave them to it.

Y doesn't seem to accept that YOUR willingness to participate belongs to you. HOW you participate is also up to you.

  • You are not willing to participate in a triad with Y and X.
  • You do not want to be a "V" with Y as hinge AND be buddies with metamour X. You do not get along with X and have no desire to put energy there. Y pushing X on you as buddy is not helping anything.
  • You are up for bowing out and wishing Y well.
  • You might be up for dating Y again if things do not work out with X. He can look you up if his circumstances change.

Those are the shapes you are up for. Could stick with them. What is there about this that Y does not get? It seems clear to me.

Y being able to handle his feelings is not your problem any more. Neither is X being whatever.

I know that can sound cold hearted, but really it isn't. It's just "my stuff/your stuff" boundaries. Each person holding their own emotional baggage and not expecting others to carry it for them.

You are out. That is the position you picked for you. Focus on what you want for you, not Y noise.

Y wants you to give it another go, but he is with X. So stick to your boundaries.

What Y feels is his job to manage.

Be careful Y doesn't hoover you back with guilt trip stuff. I get he wants to be (free of feeling break up loss feelings) and (free to have both) by wanting to convince you to come back. To me that seems kinda selfish.

If a situation is unhealthy/undesired by you to the point where you exit?

How is it loving behavior for Y trying to talk you back into it? Just so Y can avoid feeling some things?

Does your well being not matter?

Galagirl
 
Last edited:
So I'm feeling a bit confused and perhaps I missed something, so I'm sorry if you've explained this before. Why wouldn't you feel okay with dating Y and Y dating X, if things were kept separate between you and X? Is it either you and Y date and X and Y date, or Y dates X and you and Y break up? If so, how come?

While X seems like a disagreeable person, I do wonder if some of his initial declaration of feelings for you come from your rule with Y that it has to be a triad or one of the relationships (likely X&Y) break up. Perhaps he was hoping to develop real feelings for you, in hopes of staying with Y. I could imagine that putting him in a very difficult position early on.

Just some thoughts that may or may not be helpful!
 
Re (from RestsInReason):
"Y has told X that the only way for it to work is if X and I can get along."

In that case, my advice is to break up with Y. Easy for me to say I know. I just don't think having X in your life is healthy for you. I also think that getting along with X is an impossible task. Two people can't get along unless both people try to get along. And X isn't going to try.

Re:
"I just do not want anything to do with X."

Right, that's the appropriate response in my opinion.

Re:
"And [Y] says that he doesn't want that as he would miss me and wouldn't want to be without me."

Then he needs to make a decision. Either he accepts a V where you and X have zero contact with each other, or he keeps trying to push X into your life which will result in you breaking up with him. Sounds cold but I think it's what you need to do in order to survive.

It's up to you of course. You can certainly try to get along with X in order to please Y. I just think the effort is doomed, given that you'll get zero help/cooperation from X. What Y needs to realize is that this isn't your fault. You have a right and responsibility to take care of yourself.

I guess if we're lucky X will prove me wrong and turn over a new leaf.
 
Re (from RestsInReason):


In that case, my advice is to break up with Y. Easy for me to say I know. I just don't think having X in your life is healthy for you. I also think that getting along with X is an impossible task. Two people can't get along unless both people try to get along. And X isn't going to try.

Re:


Right, that's the appropriate response in my opinion.

Re:


Then he needs to make a decision. Either he accepts a V where you and X have zero contact with each other, or he keeps trying to push X into your life which will result in you breaking up with him. Sounds cold but I think it's what you need to do in order to survive.

It's up to you of course. You can certainly try to get along with X in order to please Y. I just think the effort is doomed, given that you'll get zero help/cooperation from X. What Y needs to realize is that this isn't your fault. You have a right and responsibility to take care of yourself.

I guess if we're lucky X will prove me wrong and turn over a new leaf.


Thank you for the response. I am holding off any further talks on this with Y until he returns and we can all sit down. I will tell X calmly that I no longer want to be a part of it. X says he wants to try but it's been on his terms so... I'm out.
 
Back
Top