In any case, very interesting and valuable discussion. I always appreciate CTF's contributions because they keep us out of the poly-think bubble and remind us that there is often a very different and valid way of looking at what's important in relationships when we give out advice to poly-mono couples.
"If only I could have taken the blue pill ..."
Mono places more emphasis on the importance of the relationship - again, especially marriage. While most mono folks would agree that abuse should not be tolerated, many also would pause at the idea that they should walk away because they are not feeling fully actualized - that the commitment made to the relationship should be honored, especially if children are involved. It is worth noting, in response to the idea that the actualization of individual should not be compromised, that there are a great many who believe that such actualization is an internal affair, and it is really not even truly valid unless it can be experienced regardless of external circumstances.
In contrast to the poly emphasis on individual expression at the cost of honoring relationship values, mono folks might tend to view such an outlook as hedonistic and self-centered. But then, the mono's would be incorrect as well - since they are seeking to impose their value judgement - since both viewpoints are subjective value judgments, with neither being intrinsically superior to the other.
A couple more cents for this valuable discussion.
When you get down to it, the ONLY true difference between mono & poly, is the number of participants in the relationship. And while I do think that being in a loving relationship, you're part of something bigger than yourself, the same holds true whether it's 2, 3, 4 or even more people involved./QUOTE]
We may disagree on this point. The following quote appears in the book "More Than Two" and also on their web site: "In the book Eve and I are writing, we have chosen to align our ethical compass using two guiding principles: The people in a relationship are more important than the relationship..."
It seems to me - and it's just my opinion - that the difference between mono and poly is more centered on this central theme. Regardless of the number of people in the polycule - three or a dozen - the theme holds - the relationship is secondary. Whereas for many mono married couples, the commitment to the marriage may be their priority (excepting extreme cases). And although none of us is likely capable of true unconditional love, there are certainly a great many folks who consider their marriage to be most important aspect of their lives. This is not true for all mono couples obviously - but my observation is that it is for some. I do not personally believe that either perspective is inherently superior - different perspectives and values. Al
We may disagree on this point. The following quote appears in the book "More Than Two" and also on their web site: "In the book Eve and I are writing, we have chosen to align our ethical compass using two guiding principles: The people in a relationship are more important than the relationship..."
It seems to me - and it's just my opinion - that the difference between mono and poly is more centered on this central theme. Regardless of the number of people in the polycule - three or a dozen - the theme holds - the relationship is secondary. Whereas for many mono married couples, the commitment to the marriage may be their priority (excepting extreme cases). And although none of us is likely capable of true unconditional love, there are certainly a great many folks who consider their marriage to be most important aspect of their lives. This is not true for all mono couples obviously - but my observation is that it is for some. I do not personally believe that either perspective is inherently superior - different perspectives and values. Al
I get what you're saying, and while it's true that many monogamous couples view the relationship as a separate entity, there's usually some religious aspect attached. Churches definitely place a lot of emphasis on keeping everything together, but here again, I see that as more of a tenet of religion than monogamy itself. But maybe we're parsing words.
I don't believe that either is superior either. Different dynamics work for different people. In my opinion, a relationship is only as good as the people within it. However many, the relationship IS the participants. So saying that the people are more important than the relationship would be like saying that what we breathe is more important than the air. I guess where we should then diffentiate, is which people in the relationship we should place as a priority. Ourself, or our partner(s)?
This. CTF, you realize that you have one huge IF in your reasoning, yet you keep asserting it on other people that the mono partner is irreversibly hurt by disclusure. While I sympathize, I see your case as rather extreme. Please check your assumptions before starting this discussion in someone elses thread again.
Well that's just like... your opinion, man (Big Lebowski line). You've made it obvious that honesty is not very important to you, at least in comparison. But it is to me. Being completely honest and open and being loved for who I really am is important to me. Not hiding things from my partner is important to me. The dishonesty of keeping these thoughts and feelings from her has been gutwrenching; you try lying to your partner for 14 years and see if it doesn't mess with you a little bitThe problem is, that it has nothing to do with being honest
I'm willing to accept that sometimes people don't always find the words for what they really mean, but reading this as written implies that my "honesty" was used, by me, in an attempt to hurt her. That is what that sentence implies. An example of honesty with intent to hurt is as follows: Arguing with a dickhead who happens to be a burn victim, and then to say that they will never be loved because of their deformity, that they look like an avocado hate-f**ked another, more disgusting avocado.Otherwise, you're "honesty" serves no purpose other than to hurt.
What's worse, is being treated like the bad guy
doesn't alleviate the poly partner from the responsibility
must FULLY accept the consequences
Okay, so what exactly did I do that gives the impression that I'm not accepting responsibility?must accept the consequences that come as a result
Actually I have been that honest with my grandma. I've asked for a receipt several times at christmas... But that isn't the point hereIs it really better to tell Grandma that you think the sweater she gave you was the ugliest thing you've seen?
Just part of having anxiety and depression (at least for me)Why? I'd venture to guess that this is not the first time you've taken on way more than your own part in a situation.
That's what I want as well, and by that I mean whatever she is comfortable with I am willing to accept. I do hope that in time she will agree with this as well.What I've come to realize is that I'd rather continue to build those memories and a life together with my wife, no matter what that entails
As far as what I think, I imagine that most if not all of the reasons you listed could easily be true. Fear of changing or the fear of being replaced by someone younger/"cooler" would be the most likely from what you've suggested, from what I can tell. The idea of me having sex with anyone but her has come up as something that upsets her. But I can't honestly say what the 'real' core issue is until we dig into it some more, it's going to be a few weeks more until I can really pinpoint the issue like that.what do you think are the reasons why your wife and you are arguing
I tend to agree here, any relationship is a lot of work and at least a little hassle, and a poly relationship would certainly multiply those problems. It seems like it would take a good deal of effort to sustain. This is one of the reasons I'm not dead-set on changing my current relationship, but mostly looking for a higher level of knowing/understanding. I may not be cut out for poly life, I suppose I won't know unless I get the chance to try. But if I'm not, this will probably be why.To my mind, poly is a ton of work and hassle along with all the joy and excitement and fun and people who do it need to really want to do it in order to make it a success.
I may not be cut out for poly life, I suppose I won't know unless I get the chance to try.
Yes, people change, especially over such a long time. But I don't see this as a change in myself, only in how I identify or present myself. I wasn't aware of the term polyamory until 2-3 years ago, and I didn't really learn about it until about 6 months ago. I've been essentially lying to her our entire relationship by hiding my true self out of both a desire to not rock the boat, and because I thought those desires were inherently wrong. This constant 'lie' has caused internal torment, because I don't want to be 'hiding' anything from my s/o, and because I couldn't figure out why I couldn't just change my way of thinking and not for lack of trying.
Sure we have issues, like any long-term couple, but it would take a therapist to find any 'serious issues' that we haven't addressed. We are both aware of our shortcomings and strive to better ourselves daily. I'd say the problem isn't our relationship, but rather her fear(s) of what this means for us. She is likely afraid that she will not get the attention she deserves, or that she will be replaced, or that we will have to break up, etc. Unfortunately I won't have any more specificity than that until we talk about this further.
A part of why I felt the need to express these desires to her is to avoid that 'unfulfilled' feeling that could cause resentment, because I know that is certainly possible.
CTF:
Well that's just like... your opinion, man (Big Lebowski line).
You've made it obvious that honesty is not very important to you, at least in comparison. But it is to me. Being completely honest and open and being loved for who I really am is important to me. Not hiding things from my partner is important to me. The dishonesty of keeping these thoughts and feelings from her has been gut wrenching; you try lying to your partner for 14 years and see if it doesn't mess with you a little bit. Asking yourself "Does she really love me if she doesn't know something so big about me?", wondering "Would she still love me if she knew?", every single day for 14 years. I technically did try your way, and it was mentally unhealthy for me.
I'm willing to accept that sometimes people don't always find the words for what they really mean, but reading this as written implies that my "honesty" was used, by me, in an attempt to hurt her. That is what that sentence implies...
My honesty served several purposes (in no particular order);
For her to know me fully, because I believe that is part of a healthy relationship.
For me to stop beating myself up for 'lying' or 'hiding' things.
To see if maybe we can change the dynamic if she can find compersion, or if that is not an option.
For her to understand some of my actions over the years, such as suddenly distancing myself from specific people.
...And many more!![]()
But among the list, you'll note there is not "I felt like hurting her feelings". Now, if you had said "Your honesty did nothing more than hurt her" you might have been more accurate. Maybe in the end that's all that my honesty will have doneBut that isn't what you said, and it's those little differences that make you come off as negative. While you may have some insight as to my GFs side of this matter, you seem to be lacking in any understanding of my own side, which I think may be tied to your disagreements in your own relationship. Either you don't really understand why your GF did what she did, or you are imprinting what she did onto me, which again is probably why you come off as negative. Cause I didn't screw up your relationship... but you don't seem to mind having the tone that I did. Your difference in tone when replying to me vs your tone when replying to others is astounding and I cannot find any other reason for it.
Okay, so what exactly did I do that gives the impression that I'm not accepting responsibility?That I'm not accepting that there could be massive consequences? I'm not blame-shifting. I'm not denying that what I did caused pain. I'm not saying that 'it's all okay' and that 'I haven't done anything wrong'. You've either misinterpreted what I've said as being more similar to your situation than it really is, or you are triggered by the similarities that do exist.
...how much harm does it do me to continue lying to my s/o forever? How much harm will it do if I get caught cheating down the line, instead of breaking up now if those desires are that strong? You're making a disastrous equation between a 'white lie' and 'hiding a possibly major part of yourself from your s/o'.
I'm certainly not saying that you have no right to tell your story, I do appreciate getting all versions of the mono side of this issue. However I didn't come here to argue, I came here for advice on what I need to be doing now that I told her. No one can change the past, dwelling on it is pointless. And endlessly telling someone who has anxiety and depression that they have fucked up so bad they can never fix it is just cruel![]()
Shaya:
As far as what I think, I imagine that most if not all of the reasons you listed could easily be true. Fear of changing or the fear of being replaced by someone younger/"cooler" would be the most likely...
I almost feel like having her make her own post, I can see a lot of value in that idea, but I've agreed not to bring the subject up in any way, only to talk when she wants to talk. So it may be a while before we get to that point.
I tend to agree here, any relationship is a lot of work and at least a little hassle, and a poly relationship would certainly multiply those problems. It seems like it would take a good deal of effort to sustain. This is one of the reasons I'm not dead-set on changing my current relationship, but mostly looking for a higher level of knowing/understanding. I may not be cut out for poly life, I suppose I won't know unless I get the chance to try. But if I'm not, this will probably be why.
CTF:
Well that's just like... your opinion, man (Big Lebowski line). You've made it obvious that honesty is not very important to you, at least in comparison. But it is to me. Being completely honest and open and being loved for who I really am is important to me. Not hiding things from my partner is important to me. The dishonesty of keeping these thoughts and feelings from her has been gutwrenching; you try lying to your partner for 14 years and see if it doesn't mess with you a little bit. Asking yourself "Does she really love me if she doesn't know something so big about me?", wondering "Would she still love me if she knew?", every single day for 14 years. I technically did try your way, and it was mentally unhealthy for me.
I'm willing to accept that sometimes people don't always find the words for what they really mean, but reading this as written implies that my "honesty" was used, by me, in an attempt to hurt her. That is what that sentence implies. An example of honesty with intent to hurt is as follows: Arguing with a dickhead who happens to be a burn victim, and then to say that they will never be loved because of their deformity, that they look like an avocado hate-f**ked another, more disgusting avocado.
My honesty served several purposes (in no particular order);
For her to know me fully, because I believe that is part of a healthy relationship.
For me to stop beating myself up for 'lying' or 'hiding' things.
To see if maybe we can change the dynamic if she can find compersion, or if that is not an option.
For her to understand some of my actions over the years, such as suddenly distancing myself from specific people.
...And many more!
But among the list, you'll note there is not "I felt like hurting her feelings". Now, if you had said "Your honesty did nothing more than hurt her" you might have been more accurate. Maybe in the end that's all that my honesty will have doneBut that isn't what you said, and it's those little differences that make you come off as negative. While you may have some insight as to my GFs side of this matter, you seem to be lacking in any understanding of my own side, which I think may be tied to your disagreements in your own relationship. Either you don't really understand why your GF did what she did, or you are imprinting what she did onto me, which again is probably why you come off as negative. Cause I didn't screw up your relationship... but you don't seem to mind having the tone that I did. Your difference in tone when replying to me vs your tone when replying to others is astounding and I cannot find any other reason for it.
Okay, so what exactly did I do that gives the impression that I'm not accepting responsibility?That I'm not accepting that there could be massive consequences? I'm not blame-shifting. I'm not denying that what I did caused pain. I'm not saying that 'it's all okay' and that 'I haven't done anything wrong'. You've either misinterpreted what I've said as being more similar to your situation than it really is, or you are triggered by the similarities that do exist.
Actually I have been that honest with my grandma. I've asked for a receipt several times at christmas... But that isn't the point hereIf I don't like the sweater, and I don't want to her her feelings, I can just goodwill that shitty sweater and move on with my life
How much harm does it do me to keep that secret from my grandma? Now, how much harm does it do me to continue lying to my s/o forever? How much harm will it do if I get caught cheating down the line, instead of breaking up now if those desires are that strong? You're making a disastrous equation between a 'white lie' and 'hiding a possibly major part of yourself from your s/o'.
I'm certainly not saying that you have no right to tell your story, I do appreciate getting all versions of the mono side of this issue. However I didn't come here to argue, I came here for advice on what I need to be doing now that I told her. No one can change the past, dwelling on it is pointless. And endlessly telling someone who has anxiety and depression that they have fucked up so bad they can never fix it is just cruel[/I.
As for whether the only purpose served was to hurt. Maybe I didn't get my point across as well. Sure, you may not have intended to hurt her by telling her. But I think you obviously ignored her warning signs. Now, maybe you didn't truly know how badly it was going to hurt, but I really doubt that you didn't think she'd be so against it. I don't think you assumed that she could be on board (unless the denial is that strong), so that renders the open relationship hopes DOA, leaving nothing left, but to clear your own conscience. Sorry, but h think that's your burden to bear, not hers.
Do you feel it would have been better if the original poster had just left his long-term girlfriend without having the poly discussion, since he's been really clear that he's tried to keep the fact that he's poly secret, since he knew it would be hard for his girlfriend to understand, and feels like having to hide who he is and wonder whether his girlfriend would really love him if he told the truth about this portion of himself was slowly killing him through anxiety and depression (and as someone who suffers from both these conditions, I'm not exaggerating the effect, why do you think gay teen suicide rates are so high?). I'm really curious about your answer to this. I know your wife has backtracked and said that she doesn't really need to be poly, but not everyone is like your wife. Do you really think it's more fair for the poly person to suffer in silence? Would it really be better to leave and lie about why you are leaving too, instead of being honest with your partner and saying "this is who I am, I'm sorry I didn't tell you sooner, but I can no longer live monogamously and I understand if you can't live this way, but I wanted to discuss it with you?" And seeing if it is something that your partner can live with? Because any of the options available are going to cause pain and I think being honest and seeing if poly is possible is better than breaking up without an explanation, or at least the real explanation. The op has made it really clear that just continuing to live in pain is unsustainable, so other than just suck it up, you should just live as mono, do you have any suggestions?
CoolName, I was totally in your boat. Only for a longer time, being that I am older and was married in 1978 at age 22. I was always "poly," always felt like a bad person, always trying to hide it from my husband to protect him. But he wasn't fooled! I didn't heard about poly until 1999. We broke up in 2008 finally, since we didn't see eye to eye on how to do relationship with each other, despite therapy. It wasn't just poly, but it was partly that. We'd just ended up on two different wavelengths, and had to accept we were never going to harmonize.
Believe me, it can and does. BTW, divorce (or breaking up if you're not divorced) isn't the end of the world... it can be a gateway to a much better world.
Kudos! One of my favorite movies. Remember, man, the Dude abides, and so will you.
Yep! So did I! Turns out my ex h did still love me as we were separating and divorcing. But it was too little too late. He'd done and said too many ugly things to shame me and hurt me. Sometimes love is not enough.
Good list!
I agree. Some people come here to endlessly poke at their own wounds, and take their pain out on others who are struggling, like a constant devil's advocate... sigh. These types of responses must help the struggling monos to vent and bond. And your feelings are valid. But this isn't a "struggling mono" thread. It's a "I just came out to my partner, and I am in pain" thread. I think CoolName is well aware of what his wife is going through, and probably doesn't need a Greek chorus of monos constantly beating him over the head about how bad he is.
It's amazing how badly someone's words are twisted when you disagree with the premise. Am I here to poke at old wounds? No. I've fully accepted the fact that I'm already dead inside & there's no going back. But if there's a way I can warn others of the consequences in order give them pause for a moment, then I'll do everything in my power to highlight what could happen. Far too many take the "what's the worst that could happen " approach... well, I serve as a shining example of the worst case scenario.
You're right, he doesn't need a Greek chorus telling him what a bad person he is. And he's not getting that. Not once did I say anything other than point out the advantages & disadvantages of dropping the poly bomb. Sure, the bomb has been dropped & there's no going back, but what's f--ked up, is that as clear as it is to everyone now, that she'll never be on board, you folks are recommending they shelf the discussion for a mere month. Meanwhile , he got what he "needed" by clearing the air & telling her, he got the answers he sought when she declined going poly... their conversation should be over at that stage. Nothing more to discuss between then. Except now for him having to account for why he wasn't open from the beginning. And for the rest of their time together, she'll be forever paranoid.