Children and Polyamory: Merged Threads, General Discussion

Maybe a more specific question would give me an idea of what you are looking for.

One think you didn't mention is kind of at the root of my question, though I suppose I didn't mention it. As it stands NOW, I consider my primary (my wife) and she considers her primary (her BF) to be childfree. I have to admit, I'm a little buzzed right now and I don't feel like doing math, but it seems like your kids came bundled with you; you met BF and you already had kids that he was okay stepping into. I'm asking about the partners who factored in BEFORE kids entered the equation, especially if those were "primary" partners.

Also, I'm being somewhat vague. This is an anonymous internet forum and if I had something to ask I wouldn't pussyfoot around it. The situation my wife and I are in is different than that of my friend and her BF. The similarities are that we both (couples) identified as childfree until we began exploring poly. Now, she and I (not together) are doing thought exercises on how children with people we do NOT consider our primaries would affect... everything. So, if I'm intentionally vague, it's because I'm trying to ask for advice or input that I can relate to my situation, and relay to her, without limiting it to one or the other.
 
I had my daughter when I was 16, so when GG came into my life she was about 18 months old. Maca had a child from a previous marriage before we got together. At that time, my daughter was 6 and his son was 2.

Interestingly, I never wanted children. (I know. How on earth does one go from not wanting any, to having four spaced far apart, and only the first being an "accident"?)

You are being so vague, it's hard to follow what you really want to know. Maybe you are asking: what if your primary isn't the parent because they don't want to be a parent? I'm not sure.

GG just got a vasectomy Tuesday. There are no children in the world who know him as Daddy, and now there never will be. So, in a major way, he does identify as "childless." But he accepts that I have children, and he's been in love with me since he was 17 years old. As he's 33 now, I don't see it likely that he will change that in this lifetime.

I guess the real question I would pose is: do YOU want children? Or are you only considering that someone you date might want children and you would possibly be WILLING to father a child?

I got already that the other lady is wondering if she wants children, as her biological clock is ticking. But hasn't ever wanted them before, and it would depend on being with someone else, as her primary doesn't want kids.

Sd for me, I do not want any more children. That is one major reason that GG got fixed, because he respects how very much I do NOT want more children. PERIOD. Since he doesn't feel a need for children, he was comfortable ensuring that I didn't have that risk, by giving up his ability to get me pregnant.

But if he wanted children, then we'd have negotiating to do. At that point it really depends on personality. Some people are great at being "Auntie" in any given situation. I am not one of those people. If the men I love have a child, that child is going to be mine by default (as far as responsibility goes). It matters not if it were theirs with another woman (like my stepson). The reality is, if I love someone and they have a child, in my mind/heart/soul/whatever, that child is my responsibility by default. Not all people feel that way. If it were possible for them to take a less responsible role and be comfortable, that would be one compromise.

For me, if GG told me he wanted a child, I wouldn't carry it for him, because I seriously believe carrying another child would physically kill me, for medical reasons. Buy I would compromise my lack of desire to raise another child, and allow for him to have a child with another woman, and take on that responsibility for loving and caring for their child as I would my own, no matter what, because I love HIM that much. (I only use him as the example because I know Maca doesn't want any more.)

The bottom line, to me, is that if you REALLY love someone, you accept when their needs/desires change over time. So if they decide that they need/want to have a child, you love their child as a parent, instead of as someone who isn't a parent, because loving someone isn't temporary. But again, that's just me.
 
I'll just answer this because my feelings on this topic are strong and differ substantially from what LR has said.

I do not want kids of my own, and if i were to become involved with someone who already has them, of course I'd hang out with the kids sometimes. However, I do not want to be in a parental / caretaker role in any way shape or form. If I were to become involved with someone who subsequently decided to procreate, not only would it sure as hell not be with me, but i expect that the birth of the new child would impose some distance between myself and my hypothetical paramour, if for no other reason than the "baby NRE", hectic schedule, and lifestyle adjustment(s) that come with it.


But, if my husband suddenly wanted to go have a baby with someone else, it would definitely affect our relationship. When you bring an innocent human being into the world, that new person should become the parents' top priority to the exclusion of all else, and I'm not prepared to make that particular sacrifice in my "primary" relationship. I say "primary" because first of all, we don't have anyone else at the moment, and even if we did, Steve and I have been together for 10 years and have a history, so it would take some time before another person would attain the history and experience in order to be another "primary". Therefore, anyone either of us would have as a boyfriend or girlfriend would be "secondary" by default. I don't mean this in an emotional way, but in a pragmatic way, and for lack of "better" terminology.


If your wife is as CF as I have been led to believe she is from our earlier PM's, I would suggest that you discuss this with her because I wouldn't want to assume anything.
 
I say "primary" because, first of all, we don't have anyone else at the moment, and even if we did, Steve and I have been together for 10 years and have a history, so it would take some time before another person would attain the history and experience in order to be another "primary." Therefore, anyone either of us would have as a boyfriend or girlfriend would be "secondary" by default. I don't mean this in an emotional way, but in a pragmatic way, and for lack of "better" terminology.
Great statement, YGirl!
 
I agree entirely with YGirl that children are the priority always. At least they should be. This means thinking VERY hard about having any. They completely change everything and there is never again room for selfishness. I struggle with this sometimes, as I need my alone time and space. Sometimes that is not an option.

There is no whining and complaining about it when it comes to a child. Parents quickly learn that if their child is not happy, entertained, learning, becoming independent, doing their thing, that the parents life becomes a nightmare. "Kids first" means that the parents' life can be satisfied second. Not only should it be like that, but it works better like that.

Add another parent to that and there are more people to make sure this happens. However, it's important to make sure that the balance between the parents doesn't go off. There is fine art to making sure that each parent gets their time away to do their own thing. Not to mention time together as adults. I sometimes forget what that is like with my husband. We kind of become awkward with one another if we are out of our home without our boy, sometimes.

I would be very careful about children with anyone. It's a friggin' lot of work and a huge commitment (not to mention incredibly rewarding and satisfying). There is really nothing bigger than the love one has for their child. It far outweighs any other love I have in my life. My boy is at the top of all my loves. To bring a child into the world means that anyone you love would become secondary to them. It's not a "we" thing, at all, in terms of "we made this child." It is very much a "*I* made this child and I am responsible for him/her." It is entirely a romantic notion to think in terms of "we" are making a child. Sure, when they are babies it's that way, but as they get older one forgets the "we," in my opinion. My boy is my child and I share the responsibility to raise him. That responsibility can make or break loving relationships between parents or caregivers.

I have always thought it unnecessary to birth children. Sure, it's easier to get pregnant for a lot of people but really, you can chose to have kids in your life and make them a priority. There is no need to birth them. I got pregnant because it was easier for me that was a conscious decision.

I was Auntie to a boy for many years whose mum was a single mum. My wife at the time and I looked after him often and included him in our lives. They moved away in the end and we lost touch. We were reacquainted again this year and it turns out we had a huge impact on his life. He is 17 (he moved away at age 5) and about to have his own babies (ahhhhh!!!!:eek:too young!!!), but he remembers he did stuff with us that his mum couldn't pull off, such as going to the pool, tenting in our living room in the winter, eating his first pomegranate. He thinks fondly of us and we influenced his life positively at a time when he needed that. Anyone can do that, and more people should! There are so many kids in the world already that don't have that; I really think that we should be taking care of them first. They need us, and I don't have any problem saying "need" here. Kids "need" responsible, caring, loving, positive adults.

Perhaps instead of thinking about biological clocks ticking, this friend of yours could involve herself somehow in a child's life, whether it be a partner's, or in another way. I suspect that she will be just as fulfilled, if not more so, because it's possible to leave and go home at the end of it.:p;) If she isn't fulfilled, then yeah, having her own is a good option, provided the situation (for the long haul) and time are right.
 
When you bring an innocent human being into the world, that new person should become the parents' top priority, to the exclusion of all else, and I'm not prepared to make that particular sacrifice in my "primary" relationship.

YGirl, this is how I feel as well, but the truth is, even if you and I agree on this, so many people in the world don't. (I know, I know, don't ask me why.) That was why I said that part in my post about how some people can handle a partner having a child with another and still keep themselves comfortably "spaced" from the child. I certainly couldn't. I wouldn't have your reaction. But I COMPLETELY grasp your point!

I say "primary" because, first of all, we don't have anyone else at the moment, and even if we did, Steve and I have been together for 10 years and have a history, so it would take some time before another person would attain the history and experience in order to be another "primary." Therefore, anyone either of us would have as a boyfriend or girlfriend would be "secondary" by default. I don't mean this in an emotional way, but in a pragmatic way, and for lack of "better" terminology.

I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who struggles with this particular terminology coming up lacking! ;)

If your wife is as CF as I have been led to believe she is from our earlier PMs, I would suggest that you discuss this with her, because I wouldn't want to assume anything.

My only disagreement here is that I don't think it matters how CF she is. He still needs to discuss this with her AT LENGTH. But yes, your point here is certainly valid.

I was only expressing my situation, but as I said, not everyone is like me. I definitely don't want any more kids. But I can't throw away a 17-year relationship over it, if he did. Even if he decided in the future that he did, and had a reversal or whatever, as I said, it won't be me carrying it, but I would love it and care for it, because it's my nature to love and care for that which those I love myself love and care for.

Anyway, it's good that the OP can get a number of opposing views to help make more educated decisions!
 
I would be very careful about children with anyone. It's a friggin' lot of work and a huge commitment (not to mention incredibly rewarding and satisfying). There is really nothing bigger than the love one has for their child. It far outweighs any other love I have in my life. My boy is at the top of all my loves. To bring a child into the world means that anyone you love would become secondary to them. My boy is my child and I share the responsibility to raise him. That responsibility can make or break loving relationships between parents or caregivers.

This is exactly why I won't have a child until my relationships and home have settled into something stable enough to be able to support that responsibility. I know I don't want to be single raising a child. I also know that I would like to find a partner to raise a child with. We'll just have to see how that shakes down, in the end. I do feel that clock ticking, but have always been open to adopting, for many reasons.
 
Parents quickly learn that if their child is not happy, entertained, learning, becoming independent, doing their thing that the parents life becomes a nightmare. "Kids first" means that parents life can be satisfied second. Not only should it be like that, but it works better like that.

OMG could we make it a rule that all parents learn this?

I would be very careful about children with anyone.
If only more people were! It should require a license like driving does. Bad parenting is much more dangerous than a bad driver.

To bring a child into the world means that anyone you love would become secondary to them. My boy is my child and I share the responsibility to raise him. That responsibility can make or break loving relationships between parents or caregivers.

This is true. I guess I just know myself well enough. When I met Maca, I did not want more children, but he had a son. In the first days of us becoming friends again (not even dating), his son got pneumonia. I happened to work a schedule that allowed me to watch him while Maca was at work, so I did, not because I wanted to, or because I loved Maca, or because I was trying to "win him," or because of any desire to have a relationship with him, but because it was simply the right thing to do. No parent should have to choose between working to feed their child or being sure their child is cared for and safe. So I watched him. So, for me, it's not just someone I'm dating, it's anyone I have in my life who has a child.

Just today, a child I barely know fell out of bed in our basement. Her mother is a long time friend of Maca's, but I only just met them both. My autopilot instinct was to run. I had her in my arms before anyone else could even react, because it was just the RIGHT thing to do (for me).

Some people are like this, some are not. It's very important to not only know what kind of person YOU are, but also your lovers. I've had significant others who weren't like that, but they weren't primary caregivers for my child. I now have lovers who are like me, and can be primary caregivers for my children, because it simplifies all of the relationships.

I have always thought it unnecessary to birth children. Sure, it's easier to get pregnant for a lot of people but really you can chose to have kids in your life and make them a priority. There is no need to birth them. I got pregnant because it was easier for me that was a conscious decision.

My sister is an example. She has borne no children. She's 34 years old and probably never will. But she tells people she has four kids because she loves my kids and cares for them as her own. They know her as Auntie, or "Mimi," but she cares for them like a mother.

I was Auntie to a boy for many years whose mum was a single mum. I looked after him often and included him in our lives. They moved away... We were reacquainted again this year and it turns out we had a huge impact on his life. He is 17. He remembers he did stuff with us, such as going to the pool, tenting in our living room in the winter, eating his first pomegranate. He thinks fondly of us and we influenced his life positively at a time when he needed that. Anyone can do that! and more people should! There are so many kids in the world already that don't have that, I really think that we should be taking care of them first. They need us. I don't have any problem saying "need" here. Kids "need" responsible, caring, loving, positive, adults.
(bolding by me)

I completely concur. My daughter (18 years and thank god no babies on the way) retains fond, close, loving relationships with my high school boyfriend who cared for her, as well as MANY of my close friends from high school, some of whom I am friends with. Mostly we grew out of each others lives, but they didn't walk out on HER. It's been amazing watching how secure she is in her life, in herself, in her relationships, because even though her father walked out on her, all of these other men and women stuck by her and showed her it was HIM, not her that was lacking.

If more people would put forth the effort to be an auntie or uncle to a child, less children would repeat the mistakes based on insecurity borne of one parent or another failing them!

But, and this is a huge but, you have to be the kind of person who can do that and not be self-centered. Because even if the child isn't yours, caring for a child even for short bits of time requires selflessness. Those little buggers require a lot, even if they are independent and self-motivated, well behaved and well adjusted!


Perhaps instead of thinking about biological clocks ticking this friend of yours could involve herself somehow in a child's life... I suspect that she will be just as fulfilled... If she isn't fulfilled, then having her own is a good option, provided the situation and time is right.

Not only that, but taking time to be there when they do go home, gives you a chance to increase your time with them incrementally, and sort of "test the waters." When I had my daughter a lot of the girls in school with me went through the "Ohhh I want a baby" b.s. I let my daughter spend the night with them (not all of them, just the ones who were more responsible) or invited them to spend the night with me. That way they got to wake up every few hours to deal with wet diapers, bottles, missing pacifiers and then get up and go to school in the morning.
Interestingly, not one of them had a baby before age 30. That "testing" time can be invaluable.

OP, it wasn't my impression either of you were talking about jumping into the parental waters. I commend you both for talking to people, taking the opportunity to really consider if this is a viable option (for either of you, as you did note you aren't considering it together). It's a huge life decision, and more people who think that they do want kids without the extra complication of that being a new concept in a life designed without them should make that much effort!
(bolded and colored in case you get tired of reading my rambles and want to skip to something specific to you!)
 
This is exactly why I won't have a child until relationships and home have settled into something stable enough to be able to support that responsibility. I do know that I don't want to be single raising a child. I also know that I would like to find a partner to raise a child with. We'll just have to see how that shakes down in the end. I do feel that clock ticking, but have always been open to adopting for many reasons.

You know, Ceoli, sometimes I think that people who chose to adopt from the onset are so much smarter than those of us who went through labor and delivery. Having bio children, godchildren (who I have raised) and stepchildren-- once I "fell in love" with them, they were my children. It didn't matter whose body they bounced out of.

I used to wish I'd waited. Now I count my blessings and tell the kids to wait for that stable content home where the child can be secure without extra effort on one or more parents' part!

Great choice on your part (as opposed to a good choice).
 
You are correct. I conveyed two concepts as though they were inter-dependent and of course they are not.

I was sure that you were conveying two concepts, Ygirl. Way too intelligent posting all together for it to be otherwise. I just figured it wouldn't hurt to clarify. I think it's cool that we can all share differing thoughts/opinions/feelings across such a large spectrum and come at it from the same basic premises. It's awesome that people can want a child or not want a child and can still all agree on the basic premises of how it should/should not be done.
 
Sometimes I think that people who chose to adopt from the onset are SO much smarter than those of us who went through labor and delivery. Having bio children, godchildren, and stepchildren, once I "fell in love" with them, they were my children. I used to wish I waited, now I count my blessings and tell the kids to wait for that stable content home where the child can be secure. Great choice on your part.

I really think that while I thought making our own baby was easier, it really wasn't. That pregnancy, labour and delivery thing I could've done without, easily. If I did it all again, I would parent a child that was unable to be parented by its bio parents. To me, this is far more noble and more responsible to the world, as a whole.

I guess another reason I had a bio child was because I knew it would be accepted more by my family. Both sets of grandparents had issues and still do about adoption. In that respect, it was easier to have our own, too. No arguments or life-long struggles for the extended family to be able to bond.
 
It's awesome to me that people can want a child or NOT want a child, (not to be confused with not want a child) and WANT a child, and can still ALL agree on the basic premises of how it should/should not be done.

;)

For the record, if someone else's kid was staying with me and it fell out of bed, I'd rush over to it and comfort it, too, because it's "the right thing to do" even if it's "not my cup of tea". (And sorry about calling a hypothetical kid "it", but that is easier than writing "he or she" over and over. If "it" was a specific kid, then I'd use their name or the personal pronoun.)
 
I really think that while I thought making our own baby was easier.. it really wasn't. That pregnancy, labour and delivery thing I could've done without. If I did it all again I would parent a child that was unable to be parented by it's bio parents... to me this is far more noble and more responsible to the world as a whole. I guess another reason I had a bio child was because I knew it would be accepted more by my family. Both sets of grandparents had issues and still do about adoption. In that respect, it was easier to have our own too. No argument or life long struggles for the extended family to be able to bond.

RP, I think it's pertinent to note how much you must have grown from that moment of decision to now, because now your decisions are so much more based on your own desires and needs, and not as much on your extended families' desires (based on what I've learned about you reading on here). That's awesome.
 
For the record, if someone else's kid was staying with me and it fell out of bed, I'd rush over to it and comfort it, too, because it's "the right thing to do" even if it's "not my cup of tea."
I get that. I hope you didn't think I was suggesting YOU weren't that kind of person! I was just saying some people aren't like that, you know? I see it all the time, people watch a child getting hurt, or screaming in terror, lost, or whatever, and they just mind their own business. I can't do it.
I can't withhold my heart from a child. They need love, and instinctually, even when I don't want to, I give it. In point of fact, I've started limiting myself from having any new friends with small children because of this truth about myself. (Sorry, off topic)
 
I get that. I hope you didn't think I was suggesting YOU weren't that kind of person! :eek:

I didn't think you were suggesting that. However, sometimes folks who make a conscious decision to not become parents are perceived as lacking in empathy and/or compassion.

I would venture that there are also plenty of people who HAVE reproduced that are lacking in those two areas, and often in other areas as well.
 
I didn't think you were suggesting that. However, sometimes folks who make a conscious decision to not become parents are perceived as lacking in empathy and/or compassion. I would venture that there are also plenty of people who have reproduced that are lacking in those two areas, and often in other areas, as well.

I won't even venture, I will say emphatically that I have personally met too many people who have reproduced that are SIGNIFICANTLY lacking in those two areas, as well as other pertinent ones!
 
It's funny, I sort of skimmed this topic because I don't have kids, but then I realized that I do have some thoughts because my last bf had children and it's possible that a future bf might have children, so it's relevant to my interests, as the interwebz say.

ygirl said:
I do not want kids of my own, and if i were to become involved with someone who already has them, of course I'd hang out with the kids sometimes. However, I do not want to be in a parental/caretaker role, in any way, shape, or form. If I were to become involved with someone who subsequently decided to procreate, not only would it sure as hell not be with me, but i expect that the birth of the new child would impose some distance between me and my hypothetical paramour, if for no other reason than the baby NRE, hectic schedule, and lifestyle adjustments that come with it.
Yup, I couldn't have written it better. My last bf had 3 children. I was known to them as a friend of the family and they referred to me as "Miss Firstname" (a respectful method of addressing an adult family friend here in the South). I have babysat them before; I have been part of their family events, but I was not listed as a caretaker for them in official records. I wasn't listed as a contact in case of emergencies, etc. If anything had happened to my bf and his wife, her family would have had care of the children, not me.

I don't dislike children, but I won't have any. At one point I wanted children badly, but that has passed. The opportunity is over, and at this point I am childfree by choice.

But, if my husband suddenly wanted to go have a baby with someone else, it would definitely affect our relationship. When you bring an innocent human being into the world, that new person should become the parents' top priority to the exclusion of all else, and I'm not prepared to make that particular sacrifice in my "primary" relationship.
I agree with this as well, although I think it's highly unlikely that my H would want children now, with anyone.

I say "primary" because first of all, we don't have anyone else at the moment, and even if we did, Steve and I have been together for 10 years and have a history, so it would take some time before another person would attain the history and experience in order to be another "primary". Therefore, anyone either of us would have as a boyfriend or girlfriend would be "secondary" by default. I don't mean this in an emotional way, but in a pragmatic way, and for lack of "better" terminology.
And just for clarification, this is also how I view my primary/secondary relationships.
 
The child that doesn't know

My partners and I had an interesting discussion about children today. Our children range from ages 21-29, six children in total. All but one of our children are aware and accepting of our poly relationship. In all honesty, it is our youngest, my son, who doesn't know about our relationship. The reason he doesn't know is, frankly, because he is too damn much like me.

He has the best of my ex-husband and the worst of me. From his dad he has charm, laughter, and an easy-going manner. From me he has a dark side, a side that says I need my space, need to be alone to deal with things in my own way, and you're invading my personal space. In all honesty, I have been afraid to tell him of our relationship. As it stands now, he cares for my partners and sees them as good people. I'm afraid if he knows what our real relationship is he will not want to know about their lives, or want to be a part of mine. I know it sounds cowardly, but I really don't know how to broach the subject with him, or if I really feel the need to do so. Sometimes it's simply a case of if it's not broken don't fix it.

My daughter is the complete opposite. She has gotten the best of both my ex-husband and myself. She has the same charm, easy-going manner, and laughter that my son has from his dad. She also has tolerance, acceptance, and a questioning nature from me. It was so much easier to tell her of our relationship. I knew she might have questions but would never judge. She loves her other parents, because for her they truly are her other parents.

I oftentimes think I should tell him and live with the consequences. Of course, on the other hand, what if the consequences are something I'm not prepared to deal with? Should I leave it alone, or gird my loins and have a frank conversation? Any suggestions or comments would be welcome.
 
I'm not a mom, so I don't have too much experience. But I'm 20, so I might be able to help. Ask yourself these questions:

Do I think it's important to tell him because I want to be honest. and feel that if I don't tell him I am essentially lying?

Do I think he ought to know just because the whole family is aware of it?

Is it possible he knows but never brings it up? This seems pretty typical of a 21-year-old guy. Another likely situation is that he doesn't know, and doesn't care to know, because he's dealing with his own life. :p

Maybe you can bring it up casually, somehow. I'm not sure.
 
Back
Top