For me, the healthy middle ground between dependence and independence is interdependence. My husband and I have chosen to be interdependent as in we share a home, finances, goals for growing old together, knock on wood.
For the (admittedly failed) attempt at brevity, I was trying to simplify. I feel like this is getting all jargony but my actual perspective is that the spectrum goes from co-dependence/enmeshment to independence/autonomy with interdependence/self-differentiation as a kind of middle ground or middle-way. So, yes, my actual goal for marriage is a synthesis of interdependence and self-differentiation.
Since I've made clear throughout this thread that I'm a Christian, I'll give an example from that world. We give from our joint checking account to financially support our local church and we attend the major weekly worship service together (interdependent), but she attends a women's small group that's pretty much a group of middle-class women in their late-20s to mid-40s talking a lot about motherhood, feminism, art, gardening, and whatever else from a distinctly Christian perspective while I lead a mixed gender, and usually lower socio-economic, small group that's got a vulnerable and gritty vibe to it and is essentially a support group for hurts, habits, and hangups (self-differentiation). We're mindful of one another's wants/needs and we mutually try to support one another in those, especially with a baby now in the picture, but we also recognize that our perspectives differ as do our wants/needs. We're interdependent in that we're both socially rooted in local faith community but we're self-differentiated in how we serve and how we get served.
Don't know if that's a solid example or not, but that's my general outlook.
While we have a number of things that we share with each other, we also have our own hobbies and interests. Well, he's more of a hobby person and I'm more of a people person. I relax by talking to my friends or reading and writing here or my couple of other corners of the web. Currently, he's painting and playing with war game miniatures. I don't join in.
So, in our case, the overwhelming majority of our hobbies and interests actually overlap. Maybe she likes Captain Marvel more and I like Winter Soldier more, but we're both Marvel nerds. Maybe she likes ping pong a little more and I like pool a little more, but our billiard room has a pool table with a ping pong topper and we enjoy competitively playing both. There are a few exceptions of things she loves and I hate like horror movies so she'll watch them with her friends just as I love Risk and she hates it so I'll play that with my friends, but we both really enjoy movies and board games. We just enjoy spending a lot of time together, which works out since we're both Quality Time as our #1 love language. And she's an introvert while I'm an ambivert, but we tend to intuitively want alone time around the same time. Of course, she's also musical while I can't play/sing a lick and I love a vigorous conversation about epistemology while she doesn't know the first thing about philosophy... Anyway, I'm baggin' what you're mowin'.
It sounds like you cherish the sanctity of marriage specifically to in the romantic and sexual realm, which is understandable given your religion.
Yes.
I'm guessing your wife and you have hobbies that don't overlap, maybe also friends that don't overlap, but you draw the line at lovers that don't overlap.
To be honest, most of our hobbies do overlap and our friends tend to really like our spouses.
I grew up within the evangelical world with the "Billy Graham Rule" (now called the "Mike Pence Rule") where men and women shouldn't spend time alone together cause it may lead to a physical/emotional affair AND it may be perceived by someone as inappropriate, which I now think is horseshit. That means I can't have much influence from over half of the world's population, which seems unhealthy, especially for a guy who cherishes and promotes gender equality. That's why in recent years I've been consciously developing platonic friendships with females. But since I'm more socially outgoing, my wife kinda sneaks in when they come over and starts befriending them. Before I know it, that friend from the Meetup event I attended is suddenly more my wife's friends than mine AND they want to be careful to have boundaries and not to talk about certain things because they know both of us so well. So, it's kinda funny but I've actually had to tell my wife, "I need you to let me have my own platonic female friends who you're not allowed to befriend. Yes, please be friendly but I want these to remain as primarily my friends. Get your own." Anyway, yeah, I strongly encourage wifey to pursue her own hobbies and have her own platonic friends but, yes, I draw the line as sexual partners that don't overlap.
There's a qualitative difference in the relationship that means you aren't comfortable with a female friend becoming a lover, emotionally and sexually. And probably won't be for the foreseeable future, to the point you're getting sick of hearing about it.
^ I feel "seen" and "understood." That's precisely it. Thank you.
Do you know precisely why your wife wants that romantic and sexual independence? Full autonomy? Would she afford you the same autonomy if you wanted to date someone else you were attracted to, or is the autonomy not actually mutual? Does she just want a girlfriend, or does she want autonomy to date anyone she's attracted to?
OK, there's so much there and I need to go take care of the baby. For now I'll say this:
My wife grew up in not only a dysfunctional home but a toxic home with a mom suffering from (then) undiagnosed and untreated Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD). I don't mean to take any pot shots at serious mental health issues, but her mom was and is a psycho. Off the charts control freak, which is why they're not estranged. Her mom refused to respect basic boundaries, so that was that. Anyway, everyone in her family of origin (including and especially her dad) learned that it was better to ask forgiveness than permission. It was easier to withhold information and play things close to the vest. That's why communication was so difficult early in our marriage. She had to learn to trust me, to make a habit of opening up to share her thoughts and feelings, to care about someone else outside of herself (Oh, the stories I could tell from our first year of marriage!), to make major decisions that impact both of our lives together, and to simply see compromise as a virtue instead of a vice. To quote Yoda, "You must unlearn what you have learned." That was wife.
Through many conversations, a shit ton of trauma therapy, and a shit ton of couples' therapy, we've made incredible progress in these areas. Yet wifey's default is still to lean into independence and autonomy. Early on she kept telling our therapist that I was being sooooooooo controlling, but when the therapist got specific examples she said, "Um, dear, this man is more supportive of you and more open to creative solutions than almost any husband I've ever met. He just wants to know what you're thinking and feeling, be included in the decision-making process, and make sure there's reciprocity in how you compromise. You married a gem." (<-- true story) For example, when I wanted to also test-drive the certified pre-owned Toyota to make sure there was enough head room before we bought it. It was going to be her car, and I was down with her getting the vehicle that she wanted, but I just wanted her to take into account my height before we purchased. (It ended up not being a problem at all.) She cited that as an example of being controlling. The therapist just laughed and set her straight.
Still I think that autonomous default persists in some areas. When it comes to her bisexuality, it's like she just wants to pursue this as though she's not married because, while she makes emphatically clear that she doesn't regret marrying me she
does regret getting married so young before exploring this stuff herself. Ironically, she also recognizes that she never would've considered even a vibrator or porn without my influence, so she never would've seen this stuff as plausible options without me, either. It's one helluva Catch-22. I think she's just having trouble giving up the life that could've been, ya know?
Because I read the books and mentally-emotionally went down that path, we talked in therapy about the idea of us both having partners. She was initially hesitant about the idea of us both having separate lovers. To her mind, I'm straight so she fulfills all of my romantic and sexual needs but she's bi so I only fulfill half of hers. I told her that I understood her perspective and why that math makes sense to her, but the reality is she's still enjoy more sex partners and that's crap.
Eventually (i.e. 9-10 months) she came around to believing that would be unfair and anything we'd do would need to be reciprocated entirely. But the more I thought through all of that, the less interest I became. The sheer intellectual curiosity of it had me intrigued/fascinated early as almost a case study in cultural anthropology, but the more I dug into the practical logistical realities of what this would mean for our lives together the less I had any interest in pursuing it in real life.
Sorry. I'm rambling. Did I answer your question? If not, please restate and I'll do my best to answer better.
Thank you!