Religion, politics, sex .. and other taboo subjects

Want to post about something...only tangentially related to our topic.

Just saw a post on Facebook where a friend said she was skeptical of men who claimed to be feminists, especially hetero-cis men.

It made me think.

I have already said that I consider myself more of a humanist than a feminist. I don't care if those things are functionally the same. I want a word that feels inclusive, because I want a team of human beings trying to make people in general kinder and more respectful to one another. I don't want anyone shut out of the conversation, if they have it in them to bring a positive contribution. And while I do find it valid to focus on the issues that one group deals with, especially during a time where there is particular relevance...I never want anyone to feel that just because we're talking about problems women often have, that I'm dismissive of men's issues. I don't like playing the "I've got it just as bad, no I've got it worse, you shut up because I have real problems" game. I think we can be allies to one another if we don't alienate anyone...and that's what I strive for.

Now with regard to men who claim to be feminists.

Please make sure to keep in mind the "not all" caveat, I'm not saying all of any group does any thing. I just wonder about something I have seen several times now. An illustrative anecdote:

Was at a workshop at a kink club on humiliation. A man who was a submissive and who identified as a feminist (strongly) was a volunteer demo bottom for humiliation techniques. People were making him say things that went against his values, to a room full of onlookers, to humiliate him. Sexist things, to make him feel awful about himself. I suggested he repeat that "Women can't have male friends. Men don't see you as human beings, they only want to fuck you." (Aw, I'm projecting, isn't that adorable. :rolleyes:)

He said, "But...I actually agree with that."

And this goes to the heart of the pain I feel in whatever disconnect is between the genders...I don't want to be made to feel like LESS OF A PERSON because of the nature of male sexuality. And I OFTEN feel that it is our cultural norm, and no one around me sees what is wrong with it.

Seriously, this makes me want to end myself, some days. Or at the very least, refuse to participate in any interaction with a male ever again. It's a VERY hot issue for me. One of the hottest. Need a male dehumanize a female in order to engage his sexuality with her? Why?? Am I wrong to think that's horrifying?

And a thing I have noticed...I've met a number of submissive men who are full of hate. But instead of directing it outward to women, they direct it inward to themselves. The very nature of their submission is a feeling of general inferiority and self-loathing. And they call themselves feminists, and they hate other men...they hate maleness, in general. But instead of saying "I can be a man, and be GOOD, and I can be a man and treat others with respect" they've decided that all things male are bad, and are hell-bent to take the punishment for what they were born.

I really do not see that as feminism. I see that as an acceptance of an unacceptable toxicity. And not wanting to be that, but thinking it is unavoidable, and so trying to do penance for it.

Now of course I have met sub guys who were great people, great partners, and not participating in this mentality, in the scene. Mostly the guys I've seen who bear this mindset come to Fetlife, or their first party, in a fever pitch to find a woman to punish them...and when it doesn't materialize immediately, they get frustrated and disappear. Sometimes they fasten onto a Domme they meet in obsessive, even abusive ways.

I guess part of why I want to discuss this...here, or somewhere...is that I think the narratives spinning out in our society are having some odd repercussions in certain people's minds and lives. And the anti-PC crowd doesn't seem to grasp the connection between words and underlying ideas, let alone how they play out in the ways humans treat one another.

As to great or not great... Ravenscroft, I have often said, I love my country. The mountains over Colorado Springs are majestic today, the sky is blue, the sun is shining, the clouds are fluffy, and I know hundreds of people who are in general, really really great. Smart, lovely, creative, interesting, and compassionate human beings. I LOVE my country. America has in its own way been pretty great my entire life, at least for me. But. Is there room for improvement? Oh you bet your ass. Lots. We are a work in progress, for sure. I get so annoyed with the "this country is going to hell in a handbasket" talk. No it's not. Not any more than it ever has been. Now, our politics might be...that's another story...but we are more than that!
 
Does anyone agree with me that "America the Beautiful" should become our national anthem instead of "The Star-Spangled Banner?" Sound off.

"Oh, beautiful for spacies skies,
For amber waves of grain,
For purple mountain majesties
Above the fruited plain!

America! America!
God shed his grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea.

---

Oh, beautiful for pilgrim feet,
Whose stern, impassioned stress
A thoroughfare of freedom beat
Across the wilderness!

America! America!
God mend thine ev'ry flaw,
Confirm thy soul in self control,
Thy liberty in law.

---

Oh, beautiful for heroes proved
In liberating strife,
Who more than self their country loved,
And mercy more than life!

America! America!
May God thy gold refine,
Till all success be nobleness,
And ev'ry gain divine.

---

Oh, beautiful for patriot dream
That sees beyond the years
Thine alabaster cities gleam,
Undimmed by human tears!

America! America!
God shed his grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea."

... rather than a story about the flag. With much nicer music, lined up with the right syllables, and much easier to sing.

Well?
 
I'm told that song was written up on a mountain overlooking this very area. And it does not surprise me one bit. You wouldn't write America the Beautiful from somewhere in Ohio!

:p

I'd be alright with it. *shrug*
 
Too much God talk for a country founded on religious freedom.

And no mention of the genocide of Native Americans and the enslavement of Africans... I can't sing a song to a country so divided, so blind to its faults. But then, I'm not a patriot, but, like the ancient Greeks, consider myself a cosmopolitan, member of the cosmos.

The entire earth is beautiful and great. Let's sing a song of preserving our natural resources, and respect for all the earth and its inhabitants, human animals and other animals as well.
 
Want to post about something...only tangentially related to our topic.

Just saw a post on Facebook where a friend said she was skeptical of men who claimed to be feminists, especially hetero-cis men.

I see this a lot in a Seattle poly group I belong to. It is very dis-heartening to know I am perceived as an enemy without getting to know me first.
It made me think.

I have already said that I consider myself more of a humanist than a feminist. I don't care if those things are functionally the same. I want a word that feels inclusive, because I want a team of human beings trying to make people in general kinder and more respectful to one another. I don't want anyone shut out of the conversation, if they have it in them to bring a positive contribution. And while I do find it valid to focus on the issues that one group deals with, especially during a time where there is particular relevance...I never want anyone to feel that just because we're talking about problems women often have, that I'm dismissive of men's issues. I don't like playing the "I've got it just as bad, no I've got it worse, you shut up because I have real problems" game. I think we can be allies to one another if we don't alienate anyone...and that's what I strive for.

If you were a guy saying that you would be accused of being MRA...LOL. I totally agree with you but I don't dare ever say that.
Now with regard to men who claim to be feminists.

Please make sure to keep in mind the "not all" caveat, I'm not saying all of any group does any thing. I just wonder about something I have seen several times now. An illustrative anecdote:

Was at a workshop at a kink club on humiliation. A man who was a submissive and who identified as a feminist (strongly) was a volunteer demo bottom for humiliation techniques. People were making him say things that went against his values, to a room full of onlookers, to humiliate him. Sexist things, to make him feel awful about himself. I suggested he repeat that "Women can't have male friends. Men don't see you as human beings, they only want to fuck you." (Aw, I'm projecting, isn't that adorable. :rolleyes:)

He said, "But...I actually agree with that."

And this goes to the heart of the pain I feel in whatever disconnect is between the genders...I don't want to be made to feel like LESS OF A PERSON because of the nature of male sexuality. And I OFTEN feel that it is our cultural norm, and no one around me sees what is wrong with it.

But he is only repeating what female feminists say, especially in regard to us cis-het guys.
Seriously, this makes me want to end myself, some days. Or at the very least, refuse to participate in any interaction with a male ever again. It's a VERY hot issue for me. One of the hottest. Need a male dehumanize a female in order to engage his sexuality with her? Why?? Am I wrong to think that's horrifying?

I think it's a gross mischaracterization. Why do feminists think that every guy who wants to have sex with them doesn't see them as human? For me, getting to know a women will most likely lead me to want to have sex with her.
 
Does anyone agree with me that "America the Beautiful" should become our national anthem instead of "The Star-Spangled Banner?" Sound off.



... rather than a story about the flag. With much nicer music, lined up with the right syllables, and much easier to sing.

Well?

But obviously it's not violent enough...
 
I see this a lot in a Seattle poly group I belong to. It is very dis-heartening to know I am perceived as an enemy without getting to know me first.

If you were a guy saying that you would be accused of being MRA...LOL. I totally agree with you but I don't dare ever say that.

But he is only repeating what female feminists say, especially in regard to us cis-het guys.

I think it's a gross mischaracterization. Why do feminists think that every guy who wants to have sex with them doesn't see them as human? For me, getting to know a women will most likely lead me to want to have sex with her.

It's the "men cannot see you as a friend" thing.

The thing is...the men who have said this to me, were men who were trying to make the point that OTHER men (not them, of course) were all pigs who see me as an object to defile. As meat, as something to use and discard, as Not a Person. And therefore I should stay away from other men. Stick with him, with that guy who is somehow not like all the others.

My ex used to say that. What he really meant was, "Stop talking to other men, I'm scared one of them will steal you away." And thus, he revealed that while my scads of male FRIENDS do NOT feel that way about me...he does. Because he believes I have no agency to choose to stay with him or walk away from him. I drilled into this with him a few times. I asked if he was afraid I would be raped, and he said no. I asked him then what was he afraid of? He was afraid a guy would come along and say all the right things and lure me away. He was afraid of his own inability to compete with other men, even though I'd made a commitment to him. But he viewed it as a contest with other males, who were REAL PEOPLE, over a mindless prize that could just be picked up and toted off. Or something. Like the right pickup line would just make me swoon and follow a guy home like a rat after the pied piper.

I've had tons of male friends. Men who have treated me with respect.

I've also had tons of men pretend an interest just to get me to consent to sex. And I've had plenty of men also say that they only are interested in a woman until they've had sex with her, and then immediately after, they completely lose all interest in her. Am I to believe then that the male regard for females is only to use them sexually and that is all? The only goal and the only point? Well, I would, except that I had so many male friends who had the chance when I went to the GWARBQ last year as a single woman, and let it be known I was having a sort of "YOLO" vacation where anything went, and those men did NOT take advantage of that opportunity. (edited for clarity. My male friends declined--mostly because they felt I was newly divorced and not making good decisions, as I learned from a few of them later.)

You seem to not know what women want from men who wish to be supportive. I'll tell you what I specifically want.

In the recent Trump debacle, out of 470 "friends" (most male) less than 5 of them said, "Get over it. Men talk this way."

Most of them said, "I don't talk this way about women. My friends don't talk this way about women."

I will tell you right now that if I heard a female friend talking that way about men, about how she could get away with violating them in some way, I'd be disgusted. I would give her a piece of my mind. I would not laugh and high five her to fit in.

What I want, is for decent men to stand up and say that no, that is NOT what it means to be a man. Rather than, "That is what it means to be a man, if you want to sit at the Man Table, but don't worry, I left the Man Table and I'm sitting over here with the Girls now. But trust me, even though I completely think that's what being a man is really all about, I'm not like them."

Oh, and a woman who says that a man is MRA for simply saying that everyone does have issues, sometimes it's hard to be a guy, and can we also hear male voices and such...I stand up to them, too. I would argue that being a humanist rather than a feminist does not make anybody MRA, I will NOT pick one group of humans to stand for, in opposition to others, and you can not make me. When I hear about people being bad to other people, or people struggling in pain and confusion, I have compassion, no matter who they are. This divisive shit in this country is destroying us.
 
Last edited:
Most of the people I have contact with on facebook are truckers or bikers, both traditionally right leaning. I get right in their face and say we don't talk about assaulting women. They, both men and women, claim he wasn't talking about that. I can't determine if the attitude is just that ingrained, or they are simply lying to support their candidate. They gloss over the assault talk and act like we are simply offended by the word "pussy".

Why did you say I "seem to not know what women want from men who wish to be supportive."
 
Most of the people I have contact with on facebook are truckers or bikers, both traditionally right leaning. I get right in their face and say we don't talk about assaulting women. They, both men and women, claim he wasn't talking about that. I can't determine if the attitude is just that ingrained, or they are simply lying to support their candidate. They gloss over the assault talk and act like we are simply offended by the word "pussy".

Why did you say I "seem to not know what women want from men who wish to be supportive."

It's in the whole, "If I say this, then they say that, and the guy was only repeating what feminists say" stuff. The point I'm trying to get at is...what I so badly have needed (and so thankfully have gotten) from the men in this world, is not some admission that masculinity is bad and a renouncement thereof. It's more a display of healthy masculinity that refutes that masculinity need be offensive to be valid.

And I know all too well that there are enclaves that don't get it...and I'm willing to speak to them, to a point. Past a certain point though, they don't WANT to get it, they just want to defend their right to be arseholes. Troll, in other words. I've had to unfriend a few over that shit.

But I've explained at length to Facebook land that it's not language, or even actions, that are the issue here. It's ideas. It's a man who will say, "I moved on her, she shot me down, but I might just start kissing her. Or grab her by the ..." Yeah. But I've been over that and over it. The ones who are firmly locked in their echo chambers don't wanna hear it. Fine. No friends of mine. I make it damn clear why I cannot trust them.

Thing is...I'm seeing a lot of men who don't want to be part of the problem, end up jumping into this weird pit of self loathing that leads to them feeling a need to be submissive to women, and I'm trying to figure that out now, because I've given internet talk therapy to like half a dozen of 'em now. Hating one's maleness sure isn't the answer, and it's not what women want as far as I can tell. (That is not directed at you, it's an observation on this thing I keep encountering.)
 
It's in the whole, "If I say this, then they say that, and the guy was only repeating what feminists say" stuff. The point I'm trying to get at is...what I so badly have needed (and so thankfully have gotten) from the men in this world, is not some admission that masculinity is bad and a renouncement thereof. It's more a display of healthy masculinity that refutes that masculinity need be offensive to be valid.

And I know all too well that there are enclaves that don't get it...and I'm willing to speak to them, to a point. Past a certain point though, they don't WANT to get it, they just want to defend their right to be arseholes. Troll, in other words. I've had to unfriend a few over that shit.

But I've explained at length to Facebook land that it's not language, or even actions, that are the issue here. It's ideas. It's a man who will say, "I moved on her, she shot me down, but I might just start kissing her. Or grab her by the ..." Yeah. But I've been over that and over it. The ones who are firmly locked in their echo chambers don't wanna hear it. Fine. No friends of mine. I make it damn clear why I cannot trust them.

Thing is...I'm seeing a lot of men who don't want to be part of the problem, end up jumping into this weird pit of self loathing that leads to them feeling a need to be submissive to women, and I'm trying to figure that out now, because I've given internet talk therapy to like half a dozen of 'em now. Hating one's maleness sure isn't the answer, and it's not what women want as far as I can tell. (That is not directed at you, it's an observation on this thing I keep encountering.)

I was only relaying my personal experience. I could show you screenshots but that would violate the privacy of that particular group. You definitely would not get along with that faction in that group...lol. I've even had guys tell me that a show, or defense of, masculinity (edit: masculinity of any kind) is sexist. Thankfully I don't see that in the kink subgroup.

I'm not all that active in the local community so I don't know any sub guys or hear about what motivates them. Does that come from younger guys?
 
Last edited:
I was only relaying my personal experience. I could show you screenshots but that would violate the privacy of that particular group. You definitely would not get along with that faction in that group...lol. I've even had guys tell me that a show, or defense of, masculinity (edit: masculinity of any kind) is sexist. Thankfully I don't see that in the kink subgroup.

I'm not all that active in the local community so I don't know any sub guys or hear about what motivates them. Does that come from younger guys?

20s and 30s. Men who seem to have a hard time finding companionship and are looking to blame someone or something, it seems. No resilience to disappointment, and a general fragility of ego that tips them into near-hostility and/or despair.

It is my opinion that this set (the ones I've met personally) need actual therapy, but think they only need a woman partner and then all of their problems will disappear, or if they have one, they cling to even a horrible or abusive situation because being alone is unconscionable, terrifying. Only one of the ones I've met is actually seeking and getting therapy, though.

Hell, even the partner I currently have struggled for a very long time with the mentality that feminine = pristine and good, and masculine = filthy and monstrous, until he started realizing just how pervy women can be.

Anyhow that's why I'll have nothing to do with the label and word "feminism" is because I want to support those who are masculine without being toxic, and I don't like the excessive default linkage of one concept to the other. PEOPLE can be awful...or awesome. And everybody has their own struggles that threaten to crush them. Even those who are "privileged" have demons to wrestle.

I feel like I might have driven the thread too far into this rabbit hole.

So on that note, have we all seen the Saturday Night Live spoofs of the debates? Because if not...ya should...they're HILARIOUS! :D

And also, we have a kink community member who is running for House of Reps here, probably the first person I've ever been able to vote for enthusiastically and with zero reservations, Misty Plowright. She is poly, and transgendered, and lives in a House (one of the three biggest BDSM venues in Colorado Springs.) She is married to the female Head of that House, and they are both informally married to a man. And she's running Democrat and actually (I think) stands a chance of getting it. She is out about being trans, poly, and kinky...but she doesn't make a big deal of any of that. When she speaks, it's always about issues, she's great at turning an interview where they WANT to talk about her being trans, into a conversation about policy and politics.

I'm pretty excited about her. I went to a party last weekend, and got a chance to chat with her. I think she is, ideologically, kind of a left leaning libertarian. She's a bit more fiscally conservative than many democrats. But you'd have to be, to stand a chance here.

What sucks mightily is that the GOP response to her has been that her campaign is just a publicity stunt and she cannot be taken seriously. Well of course they'd say that. Thing is though, her name is not really all that known, and I think that might benefit her. If there had been a huge media circus over who (what) she is, the more middle and conservative types here might have shied away from her, or even responded with hostility. I'm hoping that the general aversion to Trump will work in her favor in some downstream love on the ballot. Like, people might just vote "D" without really even knowing who they're voting for.

I could wish that more people knew who she is and supported her with enthusiasm like I do, but I'd be happy if she gets lots of votes for any reason at all. She's a brilliant and awesome person and I think she'd do great things for our state. I think it's really badass of her, that she refused money offered by PACs and big money interests, and campaigned on only $11,000 worth of small donations. She's a very "people's" candidate.
 
Last edited:
I have a lot to say about that generation, but I'll respect that you don't want to go there. Plus I don't want to do all that typing...lol

The final SNL skit was okay, but the actual third debate was so bizarre it was hard to top that.

I just saw a story about another transgendered candidate. She is running for the Senate in Utah. Considering the rise of the no-name presidential candidate there, it is possible she could win.

Trump is claiming he is winning while his campaign team is saying it will take a miracle. I can't wait for the aftermath. It should be highly entertaining :rolleyes:

I also saw where Trump says the press should be more accountable for lies. I can't recall any lies being told about Trump. However, with all the lies the GOP spews it would be the end of that party for sure.
 
I also saw where Trump says the press should be more accountable for lies. I can't recall any lies being told about Trump. However, with all the lies the GOP spews it would be the end of that party for sure.

The irony is, Trump loves to point at CNN's cameras in front of him at his rallies, and tell his followers how crooked and dishonest the media is. Yet not only are the media just reporting things he actually says and does, CNN even hires his "surrogates" to talk on panels and "interpret" what he says and does with a gentler spin.
 
Well the awful part of it, is that there is just barely enough, of a kernel of truth, that in hungrily rooting around for it, the supporters of Trump will swallow a whole pile of poop.

I do think that there are biases in media now. I think it's hard to find a source of American journalism that never displays any bias. It's crept in everywhere. I took classes on journalism, I know what unbiased reporting of NEWS (facts) looks like. And it's rare to find on TV.

But what is worse...is that there are sites that make up the news, like Breitbart affiliated sources, and then those made up nonsense sensationalist stories get picked up on social media and handed around, and then work their way like wildfire up the chain until they are reported ON THE NEWS like, the morning news, that is SUPPOSED to be unbiased, as if they were fact.

HEY YOU GUYS. I'm going to make up a name for this, RIGHT NOW.

"Red cup reporting." Because possibly one of the more illustrative examples, was when my morning news programs were reporting that "people" were "outraged" over red cups at Starbucks last holiday season. And it turned out that in fact NO ONE was outraged about red frickin cups, this d-bag made up the story to get hits on his website. But it got thrown around as news, until even the news thought it was news!

I mean, I don't know how many times in the last few years I've seen a story circulate on Facebook for a day or two, and then reported on the "real" news shortly after.

The problem is, the news-news is trying to stay fresh and current and on top of happenings, and they're putting more energy into that, than they are fact checking stuff.

And that's before you even get into any bias created by who owns and pays whom, and the influence of big business and big politics in the mess (big money, in other words.)

Trump also says that the election is rigged. In fact, I have been cynical and suspicious of our elections processes for a long time. Most of my adult life, really. And with the releases of emails that talk about transitioning in new leadership before elections are even complete, I think it's not too far a stretch at all.

But a couple of kernels of truth in a reeking pile of poo, does not a gleaming golden cob of fresh corn make.

What I find deeply troubling is that we are really setting precedent that the American people will pretty much put up with anything. Like, we all have way too much to lose. Big corrupt government, or big corrupt business? Who cares. Except that one guy is really loathsome. So...not him, ok? But evidence of corruption...meh...it's whatever. Go on ahead and televise our nuclear response times. Step all over our beloved Bernie. We all know you're going to be president, nothing much we can do. I mean, we could like protest or try to do something, but we've got way too much to lose. I have a job and bills to pay and a life to live. Maybe somebody ought to do something, but it won't be me.

Multiply by about 324 million voices. We've all got way too much to lose. Which means that those up top are completely unchecked, no matter what we think.

If anything though, at least it's not an unchecked Trump...I shall feel relief when he loses, even if my relief was completely engineered. If that makes me a sheep, then so fucking be it.
 
Back
Top